Journals / The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences / 2019 / Volume: 4 Issue: 2

COMPARISON OF 2018 AND 2007 TURKISH EARTHQUAKE REGULATIONS

Nihat Atmaca(Gaziantep Üniversitesi)0000-0003-3355-7561
Adem Atmaca(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9624-299X
Seydi Kılçık(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0368-8368
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The advantages and disadvantages of the new earthquake code are discussed in detail using earthquake analysis results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The new building earthquake regulation of Turkey has been published on 18 March 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In analysis, 2007 regulation on buildings in earthquake zones are compared with the new Turkish 2018 earthquake code.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The advantages and disadvantages of the new earthquake code are discussed in detail using earthquake analysis results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:2018 Turkish earthquake regulations · Base shear forces · Joint displacements

Abstract

The new building earthquake regulation of Turkey has been published on 18 March 2018. There are two different methods in the new code: Linear and nonlinear earthquake analysis methods. In the present study, the different structural applications of a school project located in Gaziantep province of Turkey analyzed by using linear earthquake calculation methods. The structure has modeled with three different ways; only with Reinforced Concrete columns, with Reinforced Concrete columns and Shear Walls, only with Shear Walls. In analysis, 2007 regulation on buildings in earthquake zones are compared with the new Turkish 2018 earthquake code. The software SAP 2000 is used for the calculations and program outcomes are used for comparisons. Base shear forces, maximum displacement and force values and overturning moment findings are calculated in each structural configuration. The advantages and disadvantages of the new earthquake code are discussed in detail using earthquake analysis results.

🔖

Cite This Article

Atmaca, N., Atmaca, A., Kılçık, S. (2019). COMPARISON OF 2018 AND 2007 TURKISH EARTHQUAKE REGULATIONS. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, Volume: 4 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1551731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Ellul, F., Dina, D., The Bingol, Turkey Earthquake of the 1st of May 2003, University of Bath Architecture and Civil Engineering Department, England, 2003; pp. 10-38.
  2. Alyamaç, K. E. and Erdoğan, A. S., "Geçmişten Günümüze Afet Yönetmelikleri ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Tasarım Hataları’, Deprem Sempozyumu, 2005; pp. 707–715.
  3. Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Resmi Gazete, Sayı: 30364 (Mükerrer), 18 Mart 2018.
  4. T.C Bayındırlık ve İskân Bakanlığı, Deprem Bölgelerinde Yapılacak Binalar Hakkında Yönetmelik, Ankara, 2007.