SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Work Role Ambiguity on Workplace Procrastination: A Research on the Service Industry

İş Rolü Belirsizliğinin İşyerindeki Erteleme Alışkanlığı (Prokrastinasyon) Üzerine Etkisi: Hizmet Sektörüne Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Guzel SADYKOVA
Pages
87–112
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it was found that there is a positive effect of work role ambiguity on workplace procrastination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to research the effect of work role ambiguity on workplace procrastination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Work role ambiguity was represented with work method ambiguity, work scheduling ambiguity and performance evaluation standards ambiguity aspects in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it was found that there is a positive effect of work role ambiguity on workplace procrastination.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Work Role Ambiguity · Socioemotional Ambiguity · Workplace Procrastination

Abstract

The aim of this study is to research the effect of work role ambiguity on workplace procrastination. Work role ambiguity was represented with work method ambiguity, work scheduling ambiguity and performance evaluation standards ambiguity aspects in this study. Workplace procrastination was expressed with behavioral procrastination and decisional procrastination aspects. It was used the survey method at this study and the surveys were administered to employees of the service industry. According to the research results, it was proved that there is a positive and significant relationship between the aspects of work role ambiguity and workplace procrastination. Moreover, it was found that there is a positive effect of work role ambiguity on workplace procrastination.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, iş rolü belirsizliğinin işyeri prokrastinasyonu üzerine olan etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmada iş rolü belirsizliği; iş yöntemi belirsizliği, iş planlaması belirsizliği ve performans değerlendirme standartlarına ilişkin belirsizlik boyutlarıyla ifadelendirilmiştir. İşyeri prokrastinasyonu, davranışsal prokrastinasyon ve kararsal prokrastinasyon boyutlarıyla temsil edilmiştir. Araştırmada anket yöntemi kullanılmış olup, anketler hizmet sektörü çalışanlarına uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, iş rolü belirsizliği boyutları ile işyeri prokrastinasyonu boyutları arasında pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki ve iş rolü belirsizliğinin işyeri prokrastinasyonu üzerinde pozitif yönde bir etkisi olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SADYKOVA, G. (2016). The Effect of Work Role Ambiguity on Workplace Procrastination: A Research on the Service Industry. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 87–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/154824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdul Rasit, Z. ve Isa, C.R. (2015). Decision Facilitating Role of Comprehensive Performance Measurement System (CPMS) and Job Performance: Influence of Role Ambiguity and Locus of Control. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23, 145-160.
  2. Adıgüzel, O. (2012).
  3. İşle İlgili Stres, Rol Çatışması ve Rol Belirsizliğinin Beklenen Personel Devri Üzerine Etkisi: Hemşireler Üzerinde Bir Uygulama. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 163-169.
  4. Andreou, C. ve White, M.D. (2010). The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination. UK: Oxford University Press.
  5. Ariely, D. ve Wertenbroch, K. (2002).
  6. Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219-224.
  7. Arora, R. (2000). Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Organization Behaviour. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons. Barabanshchikova, V.V. ve Kaminskaya, Y.O. (2013). Fenomen Prokrastinatsii v Deyatel’nosti Chlenov Virtual’nyh Proyektnyh Grup. Natsional’nyy Psihologicheskiy Jurnal, 2(10), 43-51.
  8. Basım, N.H., Erkenekli, M. ve Şeşen, H. (2010). Birey Davranışındaki Kontrol Odağının Rol Çatışması ve Rol Belirsizliği Algısı ile İlişkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 43(1), 145-165.
  9. Bauer, J.C. ve Simmon, P.R. (2000). Role Ambiguity: A Review and Integration of The Literature. Journal of Modern Business, 3(1), 41-47.
  10. Beehr, T.A. (2014). Psychological Stress in The Workplace (Psychology Revivals). Hove (UK) and NY: Routledge. Beehr, T.A., Walsh, J.T. ve Taber, T.D. (1976). Perceived Situational Moderators of The Relationship Between Subjective Role Ambiguity and Role Strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 35-40.
  11. Beheshtifar, M., Hoseinifar, H. ve Moghadam, M.N. (2011). Effect Procrastination on Work-Related Stress. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 38, 59-64.
  12. Bess, J.L. ve Dee, J.R. (2012). Understanding College and University Organization: Theories for Effective Policy and Practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing. Breaugh, J.A. ve Colihan, J.P. (1994). Measuring Facets of Job Ambiguity: Construct Validity Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 191- 202. Brownlow, S. ve Reasinger, R.D. (2000). Putting Off Until Tomorrow What is Better Done Today: Academic Procrastination as A Functıon of Motivation Toward College Work. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(5), 15-34.
  13. Brun, E., Saetre, A.S. ve Gjelsvik, M. (2009). Classification of Ambiguity in New Product Developme