SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Maternity Blues Scale

Annelik Hüznü Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği

Resmiye Özdilek(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4025-078X
Yasemin Dinçel(Darıca Farabi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi)0000-0002-8130-4123
Sena Dilek Aksoy(Kocaeli University)0000-0003-4366-5056
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-04-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the Hotelling’s T2 test, there was no bias in responses in the scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternity Blues Scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional and methodological study was conducted including 320 mothers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the Hotelling’s T2 test, there was no bias in responses in the scale.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maternity Blues · validity · reliability

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternity Blues Scale. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional and methodological study was conducted including 320 mothers. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Maternity Blues Scale, and the Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale as a parallel form. Data were analysed using factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and item total score correlations. Findings: According to the validity and reliability analyses of the Turkish version, the scale consisted of 28 items and five sub-scales, and it had a 55% variance. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Turkish version of the scale was 0.85. According to the split-half test reliability analysis, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the first and second halves were 0.70 and 0.76, respectively; Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.88, and the correlation coefficient between the halves was 0.81. According to the results of the Hotelling’s T2 test, there was no bias in responses in the scale. Conclusion: It was determined that the Turkish version of the Maternity Blues Scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring maternity blues in the postpartum period.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Annelik Hüznü Ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliğini test etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırma, tanımlayıcı, kesitsel ve metodolojik bir tasarımla 320 anne üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu, Annelik Hüznü Ölçeği ve paralel form olarak Postpartum Uyku Kalitesi Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde; faktör analizi, Cronbach’s alfa ve madde toplam puan korelasyonları kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Ölçek Türkçe geçerlilik güvenilirlik analizine göre 28 madde, beş alt boyuttan oluşmuş ve %55’lik bir varyans kaydetmiştir. Ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonunun Cronbach’s alfa katsayısı 0,85’dir. İki yarım test güvenirliği analizine göre birinci ve ikinci yarının Cronbach alfa katsayıları 0,70 ve 0,76, Guttman iki yarı katsayısı 0,88 ve yarılar arasındaki korelasyon katsayısı 0,81 olarak bulunmuştur. Hotelling T2 testi sonucuna göre ise ölçekte tepki yanlılığının olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Annelik Hüznü Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonunun postpartum süreçte annelik hüznünü ölçmek için kullanımında geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdilek, R., Dinçel, Y., Aksoy, S. D. (2023). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Maternity Blues Scale. Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi, Volume: 6 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.54803/sauhsd.1206889

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Seyfried LS, Marcus SM. Postpartum mood disorders. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2003;15(3):231–42.
  2. Gerli S, Fraternale F, Lucarini E, Chiaraluce S, Tortorella A, Bini V, et al. Obstetric and psychosocial risk factors associated with maternity blues. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2021;34(8):1227–32. Available from: doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1630818
  3. Adewuya AO. The maternity blues in Western Nigerian women: Prevalence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(4):1522–5.
  4. O’Hara MW, Wisner KL. Perinatal mental illness: Definition, description and aetiology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2014;28(1):3–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.09.002
  5. Hau FWL, Levy VA. The maternity blues and Hong Kong Chinese women: An exploratory study. J Affect Disord. 2003;75(2):197–203.
  6. Luciano M, Sampogna G, Del Vecchio V, Giallonardo V, Perris F, Carfagno M, et al. The Transition From Maternity Blues to Full-Blown Perinatal Depression: Results From a Longitudinal Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12(November):1–9.
  7. Sutter AL, Leroy V, Dallay D, Verdoux H, Bourgeois M. Post-partum blues and mild depressive symptomatology at days three and five after delivery: A French cross sectional study. J Affect Disord. 1997;44(1):1–4.
  8. Bergant AM, Heim K, Ulmer H, Illmensee K. Early postnatal depressive mood: Associations with obstetric and psychosocial factors. J Psychosom Res. 1999;46(4):391–4.
  9. Henshaw C, Foreman D, Cox J. Postnatal blues: A risk factor for postnatal depression. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2004;25(3–4):267–72.
  10. Karagöz Y. SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler [SPSS and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis]. 1st editio. Ankara: Ankara Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2019. 1–1075 p.
  11. Manurung S, Setyowati S. Development and validation of the maternal blues scale through bonding attachments in predicting postpartum blues. Malaysian Fam Physician. 2021;16(1):64–74.
  12. Manurung S, Setyowati S, Ginanjar AS, Soesilo TEB, Tyastuti D. The Item Development of Maternal Blues Suryani (MBS) Scale in the antepartum period through bonding attachment that predicting postpartum blues. Enfermería Clínica [Internet]. 2019 Sep;29:752–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S113086211930244X
  13. Yang CL, Yu CH, Chen CH. Development and validation of the postpartum sleep quality scale. J Nurs Res. 2013;21(2):148–54.
  14. Boz I, Selvi N. Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale in Turkish Women. J Nurs Res. 2018;26(6):385–92.
  15. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2011 Apr;17(2):268–74. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  16. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen S V. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health [Internet]. 2007 Aug;30(4):459–67. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nur.20199
  17. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res [Internet]. 2003 Jun 1;27(2):94–104. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/swr/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
  18. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res [Internet]. 1992 Nov;5(4):194–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0897189705800084
  19. Sencan H. Sosyal ve davranissal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. 1st editio. Ankara: Ankara Seçkin Yayınevi; 2005. 1–710 p.
  20. Kaiser HF. The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 1960 Apr 2;20(1):141–51. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001316446002000116
  21. Beavers AS, Lounsbury JW, Richards JK, Huck SW, Skolits GJ, Esquivel SL. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Pract Assessment, Res Eval. 2013;18(6):1–13.
  22. Altinel L, Kose KC, Ergan V, Isik C, Aksoy Y, Ozdemir A, et al. The prevalence of low back pain and risk factors among adult population in Afyon region, Turkey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(5):328–33.
  23. Kocamanoǧlu B, Şahin AR. Postpartum Psikiyatrik Bozukluklar. Anadolu Psikiyatr Derg. 2011;12(3):226–32.
  24. Taherdoost H, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon N. Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory 2 Factor Analysis 3 Types of Factor Analysis 4 Exploratory Factor Analyses. Adv Appl Pure Math. 2004;375–82.
  25. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Principal Components and Factor Analysis [Internet]. Seventh Ed. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson; 2019. 476–527 p. Available from: https://lccn.loc.gov/2017040173
  26. Alpar R. Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik. Ankara: Detay yayıncılık; 2018. 300–304 p.
  27. Kilic S. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. J Mood Disord [Internet]. 2016;6(1):47. Available from: http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=221091
  28. Zhang H, Morrone MC, Alais D. Behavioural oscillations in visual orientation discrimination reveal distinct modulation rates for both sensitivity and response bias. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):1115. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37918-4
  29. Taherdoost H, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon N. Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory 2 Factor Analysis 3 Types of Factor Analysis 4 Exploratory Factor Analyses. Adv Appl Pure Math. 2004;375–82.