SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques

Semra Çelebi(SIIRT UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5339-8695
İbrahim Türkoğlu(FIRAT UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4938-4167
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, NLOS sensing is a complex field that requires an interdisciplinary approach, but it holds great potential for the scientific community and practitioners due to the opportunities it offers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the current state, core methodologies, and major challenges associated with non-line-of-sight (NLOS) sensing technologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study also emphasizes innovative experimental setups and complex scene designs to evaluate system performance under realistic and challenging conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, NLOS sensing is a complex field that requires an interdisciplinary approach, but it holds great potential for the scientific community and practitioners due to the opportunities it offers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) analysis · Hidden object detection · SPAD and CCD/CMOS sensors

Abstract

This study explores the current state, core methodologies, and major challenges associated with non-line-of-sight (NLOS) sensing technologies. NLOS sensing enables the detection of objects and individuals outside the direct field of view and has critical applications in disaster response, security, and autonomous systems. Despite its growing potential, the field faces technical limitations, including restricted resolution, complex data processing, and multipath propagation effects. A wide range of approaches is examined, including both active and passive systems, SPAD and CCD/CMOS sensors, confocal and non-confocal imaging techniques, acoustic methods, and artificial intelligence-based models. The study also emphasizes innovative experimental setups and complex scene designs to evaluate system performance under realistic and challenging conditions. Furthermore, diverse evaluation metrics are discussed to support both numerical and perceptual analysis of system outputs. In conclusion, NLOS sensing is a complex field that requires an interdisciplinary approach, but it holds great potential for the scientific community and practitioners due to the opportunities it offers. This study has contributed to the current body of knowledge and provided suggestions that will guide future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelebi, S., Türkoğlu, İ. (2026). From Traditional Methods to Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Non-Line-of-Sight Analysis Techniques. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...1718848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (73)

  1. A. Kirmani, T. Hutchison, J. Davis, and R. Raskar, “Looking around the corner using transient imaging,” Proc. 2009 IEEE 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Kyoto, pp. 159–166, 2009. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459160
  2. A. Velten, T. Willwacher, O. Gupta, A. Veeraraghavan, M. G. Bawendi, and R. Raskar, “Recovering three-dimensional shape around a corner using ultrafast time-of-flight imaging,” Nat. Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 745, 2012. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1747
  3. C. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Fang, C. Yan, X. Zhang, and Y. Zuo, “Event-enhanced passive non-line-of-sight imaging for moving objects with physical embedding,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 24, no. 22, pp. 37970–37985, 2024. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3468909
  4. G. Musarra et al., “Non-line-of-sight 3D imaging with a single-pixel camera,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 011002, 2019.
  5. C. Wu et al., “Non–line-of-sight imaging over 1.43 km,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 118, no. 10, p. e2024468118, 2021.
  6. X. Lei et al., “Direct object recognition without line-of-sight using optical coherence,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 11729–11738, 2019. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.01201
  7. M. L. Manna, J.-H. Nam, S. A. Reza, and A. Velten, “Non-line-of-sight imaging using dynamic relay surfaces,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 5331–5339, 2020.
  8. J. He, S. Wu, R. Wei, and Y. Zhang, “Non-line-of-sight imaging and tracking of moving objects based on deep learning,” Opt. Express, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 16758–16772, 2022.
  9. R. Geng, Y. Hu, and Y. Chen, “Recent advances on non-line-of-sight imaging: Conventional physical models, deep learning, and new scenes,” APSIPA Trans. Signal Inf. Process., vol. 11, no. 1, p. e1, 2022.
  10. Y. Al-Ghafri, H. M. Asif, N. Tarhuni, and Z. Nadir, "Advancing non-line-of-sight communication: A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art technologies and the role of energy harvesting," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 14, p. 4671, 2024.
  11. D. Royo, T. Sultan, A. Muñoz, K. Masumnia-Bisheh, E. Brandt, D. Gutierrez, A. Velten, and J. Marco, "Virtual mirrors: Non-line-of-sight imaging beyond the third bounce," ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 42, no. 4, art. 140, pp. 1–15, Jul. 2023.
  12. O. Pueyo-Ciutad, J. Marco, S. Schertzer, F. Christnacher, M. Laurenzis, D. Gutierrez, and A. Redo-Sanchez, "Time-gated polarization for active non-line-of-sight imaging," in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers (SA ’24), pp. 1–11, Dec. 2024.
  13. A. C. Kak, and M. Slaney, Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. Philadelphia, PA, USA: SIAM, 2001.
  14. M. La Manna, F. Kine, E. Breitbach, J. Jackson, T. Sultan, and A. Velten, “Error backprojection algorithms for non-line-of-sight imaging,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1615–1626, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2843363
  15. M. Laurenzis, and A. Velten, “Feature selection and back-projection algorithms for nonline-of-sight laser–gated viewing,” J. Electron. Imaging, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 063003, 2014.
  16. V. Arellano, D. Gutierrez, and A. Jarabo, “Fast back-projection for non-line of sight reconstruction,” Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 11574–11583, 2017.
  17. O. Gupta, A. Velten, T. Willwacher, A. Veeraraghavan, and R. Raskar, “Reconstruction of hidden 3D shapes using diffuse reflections,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 17, p. 19096, 2012.
  18. M. O’Toole, D. B. Lindell, and G. Wetzstein, “Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on the light-cone transform,” Nature, vol. 555, no. 7696, pp. 338–341, 2018.
  19. X. Feng, and L. Gao, “Toward non-line-of-sight videography,” Opt. Photon. News, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 22–29, 2021.
  20. X. Liu, S. Bauer, and A. Velten, “Phasor field diffraction based reconstruction for fast non-line-of-sight imaging systems,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1645, 2020.
  21. F. Zappa, S. Tisa, A. Tosi, and S. Cova, “Principles and features of single-photon avalanche diode arrays,” Sens. Actuators A Phys., vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2007.
  22. R. Geng, Y. Hu, and Y. Chen, “Recent advances on non-line-of-sight imaging: Conventional physical models, deep learning, and new scenes,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2104.13807, 2021.
  23. S. Cova, M. Ghioni, A. Lacaita, C. Samori, and F. Zappa, “Avalanche photodiodes and quenching circuits for single-photon detection,” Appl. Opt., vol. 35, no. 12, p. 1956, 1996.
  24. A. Gulinatti et al., “New silicon SPAD technology for enhanced red-sensitivity, high-resolution timing and system integration,” J. Mod. Opt., vol. 59, no. 17, pp. 1489–1499, 2012.
  25. A. Gulinatti, F. Ceccarelli, M. Ghioni, and I. Rech, “Custom silicon technology for SPAD-arrays with red-enhanced sensitivity and low timing jitter,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 4559, 2021.
  26. B. F. Levine, and C. G. Bethea, “Single photon detection at 1.3 μm using a gated avalanche photodiode,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 553–555, 1984.
  27. D. Stucki, N. Gisin, O. Guinnard, G. Ribordy, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system,” New J. Phys., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 41, 2002.
  28. T. Orita, K. Shimazoe, and H. Takahashi, “The dynamic time-over-threshold method for multi-channel APD based gamma-ray detectors,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, vol. 775, pp. 154–161, 2015.
  29. R. H. Hadfield, “Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 696–705, 2009.
  30. C. Wang et al., “Design considerations of InGaAs/InP single-photon avalanche diode for photon-counting communication,” Optik, vol. 185, pp. 1134–1145, 2019.
  31. X. Jiang, M. A. Itzler, K. O’Donnell, M. Entwistle, and K. Slomkowski, “Free-running InGaAs/InP single photon detector with feedback quenching IC,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, vol. 780, pp. 60–64, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.07.023
  32. N. Namekata, S. Sasamori, and S. Inoue,“800 MHz single-photon detection at 1550-nm using an InGaAs/InP avalanche photodiode operated with a sine wave gating,” Opt. Express, vol. 14, no. 21, pp. 10043–10049, 2006. doi: 10.1364/OE.14.010043
  33. S. Ke, Z. Chen, J. Zhou, J. Jiao, X. Chen, and S. Chen, “Theoretical prediction of high-performance room-temperature InGaAs/Si single-photon avalanche diode fabricated by semiconductor interlayer bonding,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1694–1701, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3058598
  34. I. Cusini et al., “Historical perspectives, state of art and research trends of SPAD arrays and their applications (Part II: SPAD arrays),” Front. Phys., vol. 10, p. 906671, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.906671
  35. M. Renna, J. H. Nam, M. Buttafava, F. Villa, A. Velten, and A. Tosi, “Fast-gated 16 × 1 SPAD array for non-line-of-sight imaging applications,” Instruments, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 14, 2020.
  36. C. Jin, M. Tang, L. Jia, X. Tian, J. Yang, K. Qiao, and S. Zhang, "Scannerless non-line-of-sight three dimensional imaging with a 32×32 SPAD array,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2011.05122, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2011.05122
  37. G. Gariepy, F. Tonolini, R. Henderson, J. Leach, and D. Faccio, “Tracking hidden objects with a single-photon camera,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1503.01699, 2015.
  38. M. Buttafava, J. Zeman, A. Tosi, K. Eliceiri, and A. Velten, “Non-line-of-sight imaging using a time-gated single photon avalanche diode,” Opt. Express, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 20997–21011, 2015.
  39. S. Chan, R. E. Warburton, G. Gariepy, J. Leach, and D. Faccio, “Non-line-of-sight tracking of people at long range,” Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 10109–10117, 2017.
  40. R. Sesta, E. Conca, V. Sesta, and A. Tosi, “Fast-gated 16 × 16 SPAD array with on-chip 6 ps TDCs for non-line-of-sight imaging,” in Proc. 2021 IEEE Photonics Conf. (IPC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2021, pp. 1–2.
  41. Y. Zheng, W. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and L. Li, “Converting non-confocal measurements into semi-confocal ones with timing-accuracy improving for non-line-of-sight imaging,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 176, p. 108067, 2024.
  42. J. Zhang et al., “A 128 × 128 SPAD motion-triggered time-of-flight image sensor with in-pixel histogram and column-parallel vision processor,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits. 2024.
  43. Y. Zhang et al., “Low-cost SPAD sensing for non-line-of-sight tracking, material classification and depth imaging,” Princeton Computational Imaging Lab. 2024.
  44. S. A. Taylor, "CCD and CMOS imaging array technologies: Technology review,” Tech. Rep., Univ. Edinburgh, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://ridl.cis.rit.edu/products/publications/EPC-1998-106.pdf.
  45. M. Ballester, H. Wang, J. Li, O. Cossairt, and F. Willomitzer, “Single-shot synthetic wavelength imaging: Sub-mm precision ToF sensing with conventional CMOS sensors,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 178, p. 108165, 2024.
  46. D. B. Lindell, G. Wetzstein, and M. O’Toole, “Wave-based non-line-of-sight imaging using fast f-k migration,” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2019.
  47. J. H. Nam et al., “Low-latency time-of-flight non-line-of-sight imaging at 5 frames per second,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6526, 2021.
  48. B. Wang, “Non-line-of-sight imaging with picosecond temporal resolution,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 127, no. 5, 2021.
  49. M. Zhang et al., “Non-line-of-sight imaging based on Archimedean spiral scanning,” Opt. Commun., vol. 537, p. 129450, 2023.
  50. M. Çalışan, N. Olgun, G. Gürgöze, F. Doğan, M. Nergiz, and İ. Türkoğlu, “Eşzamanlı ses sinyalleri kullanılarak görüş hattı dışı ortamlarda nesne sınıflandırması,” in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Scientific Research, Sharm El Sheik, Egypt, Jul. 2025.
  51. E. A. King, A. Tatoglu, D. Iglesias, and A. Matriss, “Audio-visual based non-line-of-sight sound source localization: A feasibility study,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 171, p. 107674, 2021.
  52. I. An, M. Son, D. Manocha, and S.-E. Yoon, “Reflection-aware sound source localization,” in Proc. 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 66–73. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461268
  53. Y. Schulz, A. K. Mattar, T. M. Hehn, and J. F. P. Kooij, “Hearing what you cannot see: Acoustic vehicle detection around corners,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2587–2594, 2021. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3062254
  54. D. B. Lindell, G. Wetzstein, and V. Koltun, “Acoustic non-line-of-sight imaging,” in Proc. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 6773–6782.
  55. C. A. Metzler et al., “Deep-inverse correlography: Towards real-time high-resolution non-line-of-sight imaging,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2020.
  56. M. Isogawa, Y. Yuan, M. O’Toole, and K. Kitani, “Optical non-line-of-sight physics-based 3D human pose estimation,” arXiv, arXiv:2003.14414, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.14414
  57. S. Zheng, M. Liao, F. Wang, W. He, X. Peng, and G. Situ, “Non-line-of-sight imaging under white-light illumination: A two-step deep learning approach,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, no. 24, pp. 40091–40105, 2021.
  58. Y. Li, J. Peng, J. Ye, Y. Zhang, F. Xu, and Z. Xiong, “NLOST: Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging with Transformer,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2023, pp. 13313–13322.
  59. S. Shen, Z. Wang, X. Peng, S. Xia, R. Li, S. Li, and J. Yu, “MARMOT: Masked Autoencoder for Modeling Transient Imaging,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.08470, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08470. [Accessed: Sept. 13, 2025].
  60. K. L. Bouman et al., “Turning corners into cameras: Principles and methods,” in Proc. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), pp. 2289–2297. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.249
  61. J. Boger-Lombard, and O. Katz, “Passive optical time-of-flight for non-line-of-sight localization,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3343, 2019.
  62. A. Beckus, A. Tamasan, and G. K. Atia, “Multi-modal non-line-of-sight passive imaging,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 3372–3382, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2896517
  63. Q. Tao, Z. Qian, G. Han, and X. Fu, “Reflection-enabled HDOP-weighted underwater acoustic passive localization with a small aperture array,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 292, p. 116505, 2024.
  64. M. Chen, J. Wang, M. Liu, Z. Xu, H. Liu, and M. Xu, “Passive non-line-of-sight pedestrian imaging based on light transport matrix decomposition,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 192, p. 109032, 2025.
  65. L. Gui, W. Yuan, and F. Xiao, “CSI-based passive intrusion detection bound estimation in indoor NLoS scenario,” Fundamental Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 988–996, 2023.
  66. A. Torralba, and W. T. Freeman, “Accidental pinhole and pinspeck cameras: Revealing the scene outside the picture,” in Proc. 2012 IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 374–381. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247698
  67. Z. Wang, H. Huang, H. Li, Z. Chen, J. Han, and J. Pu, “Non-line-of-sight imaging and location determination using deep learning,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 169, p. 107701, 2023.
  68. Y. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Zhao, D. Wang, M. Chen, and X. Li, “Propagate and calibrate: Real-time passive non-line-of-sight tracking,” arXiv, arXiv:2303.11791, 2023.
  69. L. Li, and Y. Zhang, "Deep-Learning-Based Real-Time Passive NLOS Imaging for Room-Scale Scenes," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 19, p. 6480, 2024.
  70. J. Schlosser et al., “Fusing LIDAR and images for pedestrian detection using convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, pp. 2198–2205. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487370
  71. K. Ma, C. A. Zhan, and F. Yang, “Multi-classification of arrhythmias using ResNet with CBAM on CWGAN-GP augmented ECG Gramian angular summation field,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 77, p. 103684, 2022.
  72. M. Bugueño, G. Molina, F. Mena, P. Olivares, and M. Araya, “Harnessing the power of CNNs for unevenly-sampled light-curves using Markov transition field,” Astron. Comput., vol. 35, p. 100461, 2021.
  73. S. Shen, Z. Wang, X. Peng, S. Xia, R. Li, S. Li, and J. Yu, “MARMOT: Masked Autoencoder for Modeling Transient Imaging,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.08470, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08470. [Accessed: Sept. 13, 2025].