Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Discrete-Time Modeling and Observer Design for a MISO Power Converter: A Comparative Study of Discretization Methods for Prediction and Current Estimators

Onur Demirel(Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4221-3739
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that discrete-time observer performance should be evaluated not only by model accuracy, estimation error, and noise robustness, but also by real-time implementability and computational efficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study provides a comprehensive analysis of estimation and discretization structures for discrete-time state observers applied to a continuous-time multiple-input single-output (MISO) DC–DC buck converter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis focuses on model accuracy, estimation performance, noise sensitivity, and computational cost.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that discrete-time observer performance should be evaluated not only by model accuracy, estimation error, and noise robustness, but also by real-time implementability and computational efficiency.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Current estimator · Discrete-time observer · First-order hold (FOH)

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of estimation and discretization structures for discrete-time state observers applied to a continuous-time multiple-input single-output (MISO) DC–DC buck converter. The analysis focuses on model accuracy, estimation performance, noise sensitivity, and computational cost. The continuous-time state-space model of the power converter is established, and discrete-time models are derived using zero-order hold (ZOH), first-order hold (FOH), and the Tustin method. Discrete-time observers are formulated as prediction-estimator (PE) and current-estimator (CE) structures, reflecting the sequence in which measurement information is incorporated into the state estimation process. The ability of each discretization method to represent the continuous-time system dynamics is evaluated through frequency-response analysis, and the correspondence between continuous- and discrete-time models is assessed. The dynamic performance of the observer structures is compared based on estimation error and sensitivity to measurement noise. Furthermore, the arithmetic computational load per sampling period, execution times, and embedded hardware resource requirements of the discrete-time observer algorithms are analyzed. The results indicate that discrete-time observer performance should be evaluated not only by model accuracy, estimation error, and noise robustness, but also by real-time implementability and computational efficiency. Among the structures examined, the ZOH–CE variant is particularly suitable for embedded-system applications, achieving adequate model accuracy, good estimation accuracy, and noise robustness while minimizing arithmetic operations, execution time, and hardware resource usage. This study clarifies the trade-offs among model accuracy, estimation performance, noise robustness, and implementation cost in discrete-time observer design, and provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for selecting appropriate observer structures and discretization methods for real-time embedded power-electronics applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirel, O. (2026). Discrete-Time Modeling and Observer Design for a MISO Power Converter: A Comparative Study of Discretization Methods for Prediction and Current Estimators. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...2015758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. H. A. Mosallam and E. A. Badran, “A systematic review of DC–DC converter technologies: Traditional, bidirectional, and impedance-source topologies,” Discov. Electron., vol. 3, Art. no. 16, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44291-026-00168-0. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44291-026-00168-0
  2. A. Sakhare and S. Mikkili, “Advanced DC–DC converter topologies for electric vehicles: Wide bandgap technologies, emerging trends and future challenges,” Electr. Mater. Appl., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. e70023, 2025, doi: 10.1049/ema3.70023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1049/ema3.70023
  3. A. J. Wileman, S. Aslam, and S. Perinpanayagam, “A road map for reliable power electronics for more electric aircraft,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 127, Art. no. 100739, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100739. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100739
  4. S. Rahman, I. Khan, S. Dey, and A. Mallik, “Triple-active bridge-based dynamic power balancing solution for minimizing overdesigning in military aircraft power system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 3329–3339, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2023.3323538. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2023.3323538
  5. L. M. Spin and M. C. F. Donkers, “Sampled-data controller synthesis using dissipative linear periodic jump-flow systems with design applications,” Automatica, vol. 165, Art. no. 111687, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111687. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111687
  6. C. Yanarateş, S. Okur, and A. Altan, “Performance analysis of digitally controlled nonlinear systems considering time delay issues,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, Art. no. e20994, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20994. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20994
  7. C. Yanarateş, Z. Zhou, and A. Altan, “Investigating the impact of discretization techniques on real-time digital control of DC–DC boost converters: A comprehensive analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 20, Art. no. e39591, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39591. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39591
  8. P. Cai, X. Wu, Y. Yang, W. Yao, W. Li, and F. Blaabjerg, “Discrete-time direct pole placement for stability enhancement of LCL-filtered inverters in the synchronous-reference frame,” in Proc. 22nd Eur. Conf. Power Electron. Appl. (EPE’20 ECCE Europe), Lyon, France, 2020, Art. no. 9215835, doi: 10.23919/EPE20ECCEEurope43536.2020.9215835. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.23919/EPE20ECCEEurope43536.2020.9215835
  9. F. M. M. Rahman, J. Kukkola, V. Pirsto, M. Routimo, and M. Hinkkanen, “Observers for discrete-time current control of converters equipped with an LCL filter,” in Proc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expo. (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA, pp. 2884–2891, 2020. doi: 10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9235777. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9235777
  10. S.-D. Kim, T. V. Tran, S.-J. Yoon, and K.-H. Kim, “Current controller design of grid-connected inverter with incomplete observation considering L-/LC-type grid impedance,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 8, Art. no. 1855, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17081855. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081855
  11. M. Kang, S.-D. Kim, and K.-H. Kim, “Frequency-adaptive current control of a grid-connected inverter based on incomplete state observation under severe grid conditions,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 8, Art. no. 1879, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18081879. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18081879
  12. O. Demirel, “Current estimator LESO-based discrete-time LADRC of a DC–DC buck converter,” Electronics, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 1133, 2026, doi: 10.3390/electronics15051133. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15051133