Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Modern Deep Learning Architectures for Urban Sound Classification on UrbanSound8K

Ulaş Yurtsever(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING)0000-0003-3438-6872
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that under the Official 10-fold protocol, ConvNeXt-Tiny achieves the best mean accuracy, reaching 83.94% with MixUp and 82.81% with the combined SpecAugment+MixUp setting, while ViT attains 81.94% under SpecAugment+MixUp.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environmental sound classification (ESC) is critically important for monitoring noise pollution and ensuring urban safety in smart city applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although deep learning–based approaches have achieved high performance in this domain, many studies in the literature rely on randomly partitioned datasets that cause data leakage or require massive pretraining corpora with high computational cost (e.g., AudioSet).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that under the Official 10-fold protocol, ConvNeXt-Tiny achieves the best mean accuracy, reaching 83.94% with MixUp and 82.81% with the combined SpecAugment+MixUp setting, while ViT attains 81.94% under SpecAugment+MixUp.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vision transformer · ConvNeXt · Environmental sound classification

Abstract

Environmental sound classification (ESC) is critically important for monitoring noise pollution and ensuring urban safety in smart city applications. Although deep learning–based approaches have achieved high performance in this domain, many studies in the literature rely on randomly partitioned datasets that cause data leakage or require massive pretraining corpora with high computational cost (e.g., AudioSet). In this study, we propose a methodologically robust and computationally efficient approach for environmental sound classification on the UrbanSound8K dataset. To ensure the reliability of the results, we adopt the Official 10-Fold Cross-Validation protocol, which is considered the most challenging evaluation scheme in the literature. In our experiments, the Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture is compared with modern CNN architectures. In addition, the impact of data augmentation techniques such as MixUp and SpecAugment on these architectures is analyzed. The results show that under the Official 10-fold protocol, ConvNeXt-Tiny achieves the best mean accuracy, reaching 83.94% with MixUp and 82.81% with the combined SpecAugment+MixUp setting, while ViT attains 81.94% under SpecAugment+MixUp. In contrast, Random splitting artificially inflates performance to 98.06% due to leakage, underscoring the need for the Official, leakage-free protocol.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yurtsever, U. (2026). Modern Deep Learning Architectures for Urban Sound Classification on UrbanSound8K. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis...1830726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. B. İşler, "Urban sound recognition in smart cities using an IoT–fog computing framework and deep learning models: A performance comparison", Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, Art. no. 1201, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15031201.
  2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York, NY, USA: United Nations, 2019.
  3. B. Peng, W. H. Abdulla, and K. I.-K. Wang, "Urban noise monitoring using edge computing with CNN–LSTM on Jetson Nano" in Proc. 2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annu. Summit and Conf. (APSIPA ASC), 2023, pp. 2244–2250.
  4. M. Çakır, M. A. Güvenç, and S. Mıstıkoğlu, "IoT-based Condition Monitoring System Design for Investigation of Non-Oil Ball Bearing in terms of Vibration, Temperature, Acoustic Emission, Current and Revolution Parameters," in Proc. 10th Int. Symp. Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems (IMSS), Sakarya, Turkey, Sep. 2019, pp. 1059–1068.
  5. M. Çakır, M. A. Güvenç, and S. Mıstıkoğlu, "The experimental application of popular machine learning algorithms on predictive maintenance and the design of IIoT based condition monitoring system," Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 151, p. 106948, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106948.
  6. A. M. Tripathi and O. J. Pandey, "Divide and distill: New outlooks on knowledge distillation for environmental sound classification", IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 31, pp. 1100–1113, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2023.3244507.
  7. R. Jahangir, M. A. Nauman, R. Alroobaea, J. Almotiri, M. M. Malik, and S. M. Alzahrani, "Deep learning-based environmental sound classification using feature fusion and data enhancement", Comput. Mater. Continua, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1069–1091, 2023, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2023.032719.
  8. B. Peng, K. I.-K. Wang, and W. H. Abdulla, "Robust classification of urban sounds in noisy environments: A novel approach using SPWVD–MFCC and dual-stream classifier", Acoust. Aust., vol. 53, pp. 253–268, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40857-025-00350-6.
  9. A. L. Florentino, E. L. Diniz, and P. T. Aquino-Jr., "A dataset for environmental sound recognition in embedded systems for autonomous vehicles", Sci. Data, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1148, 2025.
  10. A. Bansal and N. K. Garg, "Robust technique for environmental sound classification using convolutional recurrent neural network", Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 54755–54772, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-17066-2.
  11. S. Chen, N. Meng, H. Li, and W. Fang, "Efficient deep neural network compression for environmental sound classification on microcontroller units", Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 501–515, 2024, doi: 10.55730/1300-0632.4084.
  12. K. J. Piczak, "Environmental sound classification with convolutional neural networks", in Proc. 2015 IEEE 25th Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Signal Process. (MLSP), 2015, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/MLSP.2015.7324337.
  13. J. Salamon and J. P. Bello, "Deep convolutional neural networks and data augmentation for environmental sound classification", IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 279–283, 2017, doi: 10.1109/LSP.2017.2657381.
  14. Z. Mushtaq and S. F. Su, "Environmental sound classification using a regularized deep convolutional neural network with data augmentation", Appl. Acoust., vol. 167, Art. no. 107389, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107389.
  15. M. Cartwright, A. L. Cramer, J. Salamon, and J. P. Bello, "TriCycle: Audio representation learning from sensor network data using self-supervision", in Proc. 2019 IEEE Workshop Appl. Signal Process. Audio Acoust. (WASPAA), 2019, pp. 278–282.
  16. A. I. Middya and S. Roy, "IoT-cloud based traffic honk monitoring system: Empowering participatory sensing", Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 51955–51980, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-17419-x.
  17. J. Fischer, M. Orescanin, and E. Eckstrand, "VI-PANN: Harnessing transfer learning and uncertainty-aware variational inference for improved generalization in audio pattern recognition", IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 33347–33360, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3372423.
  18. L. F. C. Garrido, G. S. T. Rodrigues, L. B. Costa, D. J. Kurtz, and R. R. Daros, "Validation of a swine cough monitoring system under field conditions", AgriEngineering, vol. 7, no. 5, Art. no. 140, 2025.
  19. J. Chen, F. Zhang, and Y. Li, "Sound-based real-time scrap falling state monitoring in the shearing process of wide heavy plate mill", IEEE Sens. J., vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 17092–17102, 2023.
  20. X. Chen, M. Wang, R. Kan, and H. Qiu, "Improved patch-mix transformer and contrastive learning method for sound classification in noisy environments", Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 21, Art. no. 9711, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14219711.
  21. Y. Gong, Y.-A. Chung, and J. Glass, "AST: Audio spectrogram transformer", in Proc. Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 571–575, doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2021-698.
  22. R. Akter, M. R. Islam, S. K. Debnath, P. K. Sarker, and M. K. Uddin, "A hybrid CNN–LSTM model for environmental sound classification: Leveraging feature engineering and transfer learning", Digit. Signal Process., vol. 163, Art. no. 105234, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105234.
  23. H. Li, H. Chen, C. Yao, Y. Xi, and Z. Wang, "Detection of wind turbine hub bolt drop noise based on fusion acoustic features classification", J. Vib. Control, Advance online publication, 2025, doi: 10.1177/10775463251357096.
  24. S. Hu, Y. Chu, Z. Wen, G. Zhou, Y. Sun, and A. Chen, "Deep learning bird song recognition based on MFF-ScSEnet", Ecol. Indic., vol. 154, Art. no. 110844, 2023.
  25. T. She, H. Shao, X. Deng, and Y. Jiang, "Design and analysis of a novel quantum-classical hybrid neural network for environmental sound classification", Appl. Acoust., vol. 231, Art. no. 110527, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110527.
  26. J. Salamon, C. Jacoby, and J. P. Bello, "A dataset and taxonomy for urban sound research", in Proc. 22nd ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, 2014, pp. 1041–1044.
  27. M. Tan and Q. V. Le, "EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks", in Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), 2019, pp. 6105–6114.
  28. Z. Liu, H. Mao, C.-Y. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie, "A ConvNet for the 2020s", in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2022, pp. 11976–11986, doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167.
  29. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, M. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, "An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale", in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2021.
  30. Y. Tokozume, Y. Ushiku, and T. Harada, "Learning from between-class examples for deep sound recognition", in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2018.
  31. S. Abdoli, P. Cardinal, and A. L. Koerich, "End-to-end environmental sound classification using a 1D convolutional neural network", Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 136, pp. 252–263, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.040.
  32. W. Mu, B. Yin, X. Huang, J. Xu, and Z. Du, "Environmental sound classification using temporal-frequency attention based convolutional neural network", Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 21552, 2021.