Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Örgüt Kültürü Algısı ve Örgütsel Çift Yönlülük İlişkisi: Örgütsel Düzeyde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracılık Etkisi

Pages
155–171
Publication Date
2014-09-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it isn’t found that the information sharing on the organizational level has a moderating effect on the relationship between the perception of organizational culture and the organisational ambidexterity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a significant effect of the organisational culture percieved by supervisors to the organizational ambidexterity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, it isn’t found that the information sharing on the organisational level has a significant effect of the organizational ambidexterity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it isn’t found that the information sharing on the organizational level has a moderating effect on the relationship between the perception of organizational culture and the organisational ambidexterity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgüt kültürü · örgütsel çift yönlülük · keşfedici stratejiler

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a significant effect of the organisational culture percieved by supervisors to the organizational ambidexterity. The results of the studies realised on enterprises showed that cultural tightness and cultural looseness perception influence the organizational ambidexterity. However, a meaningful relationship between the perception of organisational culture (tightness/ looseness culture) with the information sharing on the organizational level could not be detected. Besides, it isn’t found that the information sharing on the organisational level has a significant effect of the organizational ambidexterity. Therefore, it isn’t found that the information sharing on the organizational level has a moderating effect on the relationship between the perception of organizational culture and the organisational ambidexterity.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yöneticilerin kurumlarına dair algıladıkları örgüt kültürünün örgütsel çift yönlülük üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olup olmadığını belirlemektir. İşletmeler üzerinde yapılan araştırma sonuçları, sıkı ve gevşek kültür algısının örgütsel çift yönlülük üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Örgüt kültürü (gevşek/ sıkı kültür) algısı ile örgütsel düzeyde bilgi paylaşımı arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin varlığı tespit edilememiştir. Ayrıca, örgütsel düzeyde bilgi paylaşımının örgütsel çift yönlülük üzerinde anlamlı etkisi bulunamamıştır. Bu sebeple, örgüt kültürü algısı ve örgütsel çift yönlülük ilişkisinde örgütsel düzeyde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık etkisi bulunamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FINDIKLI, M. A., PINAR, İ. (2014). Örgüt Kültürü Algısı ve Örgütsel Çift Yönlülük İlişkisi: Örgütsel Düzeyde Bilgi Paylaşımının Aracılık Etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 155–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/15395

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ADLER, Paul, S., GOLDOFTAS, Barbara ve David I. LEVINE (1999), “Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model change overs in the Toyota production system”, Organization Science,10 (1), 43 -68. AGOGUÉ, Marine, YSTRÖM, Anna ve Pascal LE MASSON (2012), “Rethinking the role of intermediaries as an architect of collective exploration and creation of knowledge in open innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Manageme nt, 17(2). ANDRIOPOULOS, Constantine ve Marianne W. LEWIS (2009), “Exploitation -exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation”, Organization Science, 20, 696 -717. AKDOĞAN, Şükrü, AKDOĞAN, Asuman, A. ve Ayşe CİNGÖ Z (2009), “Organizational Ambidexterity: An Empirical Examination Of Organizational Factors As Antecedents Of Organizational Ambidexterity”, Journal of Global Strategic Management, 06, 17 -28. BADEN -FULLER, Charles ve Henk W. VOLBERDA (1997), “Strategic Ren ewal, How Large Complex Organizaitons prepare for the Future”, International Studies of Mgt. & Org., 27(2), 95 -120. BARON, Reuben, M. ve David, A. KENNY (1986), “The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 -1182. BENNER, Mary J. ve Michael L. TUSHMAN (2003), “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited”, Academy Of Man agement Review,28 (2), 238 -256. CAO, Qing, Eric GEDAJLOVIC ve Hongping ZHANG (2009), “ Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects”, Organization Science, 20(4), 781 -796. COHEN, Wesley, M. ve Daniel, A. LEVINTHAL (1990), “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128 –153. DAMANPOUR, Fariborz (1991), “Organizational innovation: A meta - analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy ofManagement Journal, 34 (3), 555 -590. DENISON, Daniel,R. (1990), Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Oxford, England, John Wiley & Sons, 1 -267. DUR, Serkan, YILDIZ, Sibel ve Nigar Çakar DEMİRCAN (2010), “Bilgi Yönetimi ve Örgütsel Etkinlik İLişkisi: Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgüt yapısının Temel Etkileri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(1), 71 -93. DURISIN, Boris ve Gergana TODOROVA (2012), “A Study of the Performativity of the “Ambidextrous Organizations” Theory: Neither Lost in nor Lost before Translatio n”,