Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

The Relationship Between Vaccine Hesitation in Pregnancy and Cyberchondria Level: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Türkiye

Gebelikte Aşı Tereddüdü ile Siberkondri Düzeyi Arasındaki İlişki: Doğu Türkiye'de Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Nesrullah Ayşin(Hakkari University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Hakkari, Türkiye)0000-0001-7087-8810
Samet Koltaş(Hakkari University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Hakkari, Türkiye)0009-0000-1272-4223
Emine Kurt Can(Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Van, Türkiye)0000-0002-4519-3286
Pages
253–260
Publication Date
2025-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Findings indicate that increased cyberchondria levels significantly elevate vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Vaccination is an effective preventive measure, yet vaccine hesitancy remains a major public health problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted between February and May 2025 with 234 pregnant women residing in rural areas of eastern Türkiye and receiving antenatal care at Family Health Centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Findings indicate that increased cyberchondria levels significantly elevate vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aşı tereddütü · gebelik · hemşirelik

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination is an effective preventive measure, yet vaccine hesitancy remains a major public health problem. Meanwhile, cyberchondria, defined as excessive and anxiety-provoking online health information seeking, is increasingly common and may influence vaccination decisions during pregnancy. Aim: This study aimed to examine the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and cyberchondria levels among pregnant women. Method: A descriptive and cross-sectional design was used. The study was conducted between February and May 2025 with 234 pregnant women residing in rural areas of eastern Türkiye and receiving antenatal care at Family Health Centers. Data were collected face-to-face using the Pregnancy Diagnosis Form, Vaccine Hesitation Scale (VHS), and Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS). Analyses included descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear regression (p < 0.05). Results: The mean VHS score was 63.73 ± 9.90, while the mean CSS score was 41.46 ± 5.37. A significant positive correlation was found between VHS and CSS (r = 0.707, p < 0.001), with cyberchondria explaining 49.8% of the variance in vaccine hesitancy. Both VHS and CSS scores were significantly higher among women with lower education levels and among those with concerns about vaccine side effects, fetal harm, and vaccine content (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Findings indicate that increased cyberchondria levels significantly elevate vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women. Interventions to improve digital health literacy and provide reliable information are essential. Public health nurses should play a significant role in this process by providing education and guidance to pregnant women.

Özet

Giriş: Gebelik fizyolojik bir süreç olmakla birlikte anne ve fetüs açısından çeşitli riskler içerebilir. Aşılama, önemli bir koruyucu sağlık uygulamasıdır; ancak aşı tereddüdü günümüzde ciddi bir halk sağlığı sorunu olarak devam etmektedir. Öte yandan, internetten yoğun ve kaygı uyandırıcı sağlık bilgisi arama davranışı olan siberkondri giderek yaygınlaşmakta ve gebelerin aşı kararlarını etkileyebilmektedir. Amaç: Bu çalışma, gebelikte aşı tereddüdü ile siberkondri düzeyi arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tasarıma sahip araştırma, 2025 yılı Şubat-Mayıs ayları arasında Türkiye’nin doğusunda kırsal bölgelerde yaşayan ve birinci basamak aile sağlığı merkezlerinden hizmet alan 234 gebe ile yürütüldü. Veriler, Gebelik Tanıtım Formu, Aşı Tereddüt Ölçeği (VHS) ve Siberkondri Ölçeği (CSS) ile yüz yüze toplandı. Analizlerde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, t-testi, ANOVA, Pearson korelasyon ve doğrusal regresyon kullanıldı (p < 0,05). Bulgular: Gebelerin VHS ortalama puanı 63,73 ± 9,90; CSS ortalama puanı 41,46 ± 5,37 olarak bulundu. VHS ve CSS arasında pozitif yönde güçlü bir ilişki saptandı (r = 0,707; p < 0,001) ve CSS, VHS üzerindeki varyansın %49,8’ini açıklamıştır. Eğitim düzeyi düşük olan, aşıların yan etkileri, fetüse zarar verme olasılığı ve içerik konusunda endişe duyan gebelerde VHS ve CSS puanları anlamlı şekilde daha yüksektir (p<0,05). Sonuç: Bulgular, artan siberkondri düzeyinin gebelerde aşı tereddüdünü önemli ölçüde artırdığını göstermektedir. Dijital sağlık okuryazarlığının geliştirilmesi ve doğru bilgiye dayalı danışmanlık hizmetleri, aşı tereddüdünü azaltmada kritik öneme sahiptir. Halk sağlığı hemşireleri bu süreçte gebelere eğitim ve rehberlik sağlayarak önemli bir rol üstlenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayşin, N., Koltaş, S., Can, E. K. (2025). The Relationship Between Vaccine Hesitation in Pregnancy and Cyberchondria Level: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Türkiye. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.1735830

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Afolabi, I. B., Aremu, A. B., Maidoki, L. A., & Atulomah, N. O. (2022). predictors of hepatitis b virus infection vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Lubaga Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. International Journal of Women’s Health, Volume 14, 1093–1104. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S378000
  2. Agricola, E., Gesualdo, F., Alimenti, L., Pandolfi, E., Carloni, E., D’Ambrosio, A., … Tozzi, A. E. (2016). Knowledge attitude and practice toward pertussis vaccination during pregnancy among pregnant and postpartum Italian women. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 12(8), 1982–1988. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1188242
  3. Altındiş, S., İnci, M. B., Aslan, F. G., & Altındiş, M. (2018). Üniversite çalışanlarında siberkondria düzeyleri ve ilişkili faktörlerin incelenmesi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 8(2), 359–370. doi: 10.31832/smj.423652
  4. Ambrosini, F., Truzoli, R., Vismara, M., Vitella, D., & Biolcati, R. (2022). The effect of cyberchondria on anxiety, depression and quality of life during COVID-19: The mediational role of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and Internet addiction. Heliyon, 8(5). Retrieved from https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(22)00725-3
  5. Arora, M., & Lakshmi, R. (2021). Vaccines—Safety in pregnancy. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 76, 23–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.02.002
  6. Battineni, G., Baldoni, S., Chintalapudi, N., Sagaro, G. G., Pallotta, G., Nittari, G., & Amenta, F. (2020). Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information. Digital Health, 6, 2055207620948996. doi: 10.1177/2055207620948996
  7. Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W. (2021). Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine, 40, 101113. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2025, May 15). Association of vaccine hesitancy with maternal influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage – United States, 2019–20 to 2022–23. Retrieved 28 May 2025, from FluVaxView website: https://www.cdc.gov/fluvaxview/coverage-by-season/pregnant-2022-2023.html
  9. Çetin, K., & Sögüt, S. C. (2024). The relationship between vaccine hesitancy and health literacy in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health, 24(1), 361. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03148-2
  10. Chang, Y. W., Tsai, S.-M., Lin, P.C., & Chou, F.-H. (2019). Willingness to receive influenza vaccination during pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant women in Taiwan. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 36(3), 284–295. doi: 10.1111/phn.12600
  11. Çıklar, S., & Güner, P. D. (2020). Knowledge, behavior and attitude of mother’s about childhood immunization and reasons of vaccination rejection and hesitancy: A study of mixt methodology. Ankara Medical Journal, 20(1), 180–195. doi: 10.5505/amj.2020.80148
  12. Çınar G, Akdemir-Kalkan İ, Yılmaz-Karadağ F., Hocaoğlu, M., Deniz, S., Işık, M.E.,. & Kaplan-Atalay, E. (2022). Gebelerin tetanos aşısıyla ilgili bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Retrieved 27 May 2025, from https://www.klimikdergisi.org/tr/2022/06/27/gebelerin-tetanos-asisina-yaklasimlari-2//
  13. Costantino, C., Rizzo, C., Rosselli, R., Battista, T., Conforto, A., Cimino, L., … Fiacchini, D. (2022). Ten actions to counteract vaccine hesitancy suggested by the italian society of hygiene, preventive medicine, and public health. Vaccines, 10(7), 1030. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071030
  14. Do Nascimento, I. J. B., Pizarro, A. B., Almeida, J. M., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Gonçalves, M. A., Björklund, M., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2022). Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 100(9), 544. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654
  15. Doğan, S., Acar, F., & Doğan, T. G. B. (2021). İnternet bağımlılığı ve sağlık anksiyetesinin siberkondria davranışları üzerine etkisi. Erciyes Akademi, 35(1), 281–298.
  16. Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. (2013). Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1763–1773. doi: 10.4161/hv.24657
  17. Erdoğan, A., & Hocaoglu, C. (2020). Siberkondria: Bir gözden geçirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(4), 435–443. doi: 10.18863/pgy.654648
  18. Evcili, F., & Dağlar, G. (2019). Gebelikte Risk Algısı Ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Cukurova Medical Journal, 44, 211–222. doi: 10.17826/cumj.554151
  19. Fergus, T. A., & Spada, M. M. (2017). Cyberchondria: Examining relations with problematic Internet use and metacognitive beliefs. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(6), 1322–1330. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2102
  20. Ghamri, R. A., Othman, S. S., Alhiniah, M. H., Alelyani, R. H., Badawi, A. M., & Alshahrani, A. A. (2022). Acceptance of covid-19 vaccine and associated factors among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia. Patient Preference and Adherence, 16, 861–873. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S357653
  21. Güzel, S., & Özer, Z. (2021). Kalp hastalarında siberkondria düzeyleri ve etkileyen faktörler. Kardiyovasküler Hemşirelik Dergisi. Retrieved from https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=kvhd&plng=tur&un=KVHD-94940
  22. Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Liang, H., & Chen, Y. (2017). Seasonal influenza vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Zhejiang Province, China: Evidence based on health belief model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121551
  23. Kılınçarslan, M. G., Sarıgül, B., Toraman, Ç., & Şahin, E. M. (2020). Development of valid and reliable Scale of Vaccine Hesitancy in Turkish language. Konuralp Medical Journal, 12(3), 420–429. doi: 10.18521/ktd.693711
  24. Kurasawa, K. (2023). Maternal vaccination-current status, challenges, and opportunities. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 49(2), 493–509. doi: 10.1111/jog.15503
  25. Lennon, S. L. (2016). Risk perception in pregnancy: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(9), 2016–2029. doi: 10.1111/jan.13007
  26. MacDonald, N. E. & SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161–4164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
  27. MacDougall, D. M., Halperin, B. A., Langley, J. M., McNeil, S. A., MacKinnon-Cameron, D., Li, L., & Halperin, S. A. (2016). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of pregnant women approached to participate in a Tdap maternal immunization randomized, controlled trial. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 12(4), 879–885. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1130193
  28. Mansur, F., & Bıyık, E. (2022). Sosyal pazarlama aracı olarak kullanılan dijital medyanın, Covid-19 aşısına yönelik bireysel tutumlara etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 257–278.
  29. Marsh, H. A., Malik, F., Shapiro, E., Omer, S. B., & Frew, P. M. (2014). Message framing strategies to increase influenza immunization uptake among pregnant African American women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(7), 1639–1647. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1404-9
  30. McLean, J. (2023, October 2). Benefits of good-quality online health information and risks of ‘Dr Google’. Retrieved 27 May 2025, from Nursing Times website: https://www.nursingtimes.net/patient-safety/benefits-of-good-quality-online-health-information-and-risks-of-dr-google-02-10-2023/
  31. Mercan, Y., Öztemel, Ç., & Bulut, S. (2023). 48 ay ve daha küçük çocuğu olan ebeveynlerin çocukluk çağı aşılarına yönelik bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarının incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 17(2), 313–323. doi: 10.21763/tjfmpc.1242007
  32. Mitchell, S. L., Schulkin, J., & Power, M. L. (2023). Vaccine hesitancy in pregnant Women: A narrative review. Vaccine, 41(29), 4220–4227. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.047
  33. Mohan, S., Reagu, S., Lindow, S., & Alabdulla, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in perinatal women: A cross sectional survey. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 49(6), 678–685. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0069
  34. Moschese, V., De Angelis, L., Capogna, M. V., Graziani, S., Baglivo, F., Pietropolli, A., … Italian Society of Pediatric Allergology and Immunology (SIAIP) Vaccine Committee. (2023). Vaccine hesitancy and knowledge regarding maternal immunization among reproductive age women in central Italy: A cross sectional study. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 4, 1237064. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1237064
  35. Nan, X., Wang, Y., & Thier, K. (2022). Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation. Social Science & Medicine, 314, 115398. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115398
  36. Nichol, B., McCready, J. L., Steen, M., Unsworth, J., Simonetti, V., & Tomietto, M. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis during pregnancy and in mothers of infants under two years: An umbrella review. PloS One, 18(3), e0282525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282525
  37. Offeddu, V., Tam, C. C., Yong, T. T., Tan, L. K., Thoon, K. C., Lee, N., … Yung, C. F. (2019). Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 890. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8
  38. O’Leary, S. T., Riley, L. E., Lindley, M. C., Allison, M. A., Albert, A. P., Fisher, A., … Kempe, A. (2019). Obstetrician–Gynecologists’ Strategies to Address Vaccine Refusal Among Pregnant Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(1), 40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003005
  39. Otieno, N. A., Otiato, F., Nyawanda, B., Adero, M., Wairimu, W. N., Ouma, D., … Verani, J. R. (2020). Drivers and barriers of vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in Kenya. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(10), 2429–2437. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1723364
  40. Özceylan, G., Toprak, D., & Esen, E. S. (2020). Vaccine rejection and hesitation in Turkey. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(5), 1034–1039. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1717182
  41. Özyildiz, K. H., & Alkan, A. (2022). Akademisyenlerin sağlık anksiyeteleri ile siberkondri düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(33), 309–324. doi: 10.21076/vizyoner.903964
  42. Patel, A., Puglisi, J. L., Patel, S., & Tarn, D. M. (2024). Covid-19 vaccine acceptance in pregnant women in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Women’s Health, 33(4), 453–466. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0498
  43. Prieto-Campo, Á., Batista, A. D., Magalhães Silva, T., Herdeiro, M. T., Roque, F., Figueiras, A., & Zapata-Cachafeiro, M. (2024). Understanding vaccination hesitation among health professionals: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Public Health, 226, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.029
  44. Puri, N., Coomes, E. A., Haghbayan, H., & Gunaratne, K. (2020). Social media and vaccine hesitancy: New updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(11), 2586–2593. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
  45. Qiu, X., Bailey, H., & Thorne, C. (2021). Barriers and facilitators associated with vaccine acceptance and uptake among pregnant women in high income countries: A mini-review. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 626717. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.626717
  46. Razzaghi, H. (2023). Influenza, tdap, and covid-19 vaccination coverage and hesitancy among pregnant women—United States, April 2023. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7239a4
  47. Rosso, A., Massimi, A., Pitini, E., Nardi, A., Baccolini, V., Marzuillo, C., … Villari, P. (2020). Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: A systematic review of the literature. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(8), 1969–1980. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1698901
  48. Sinuraya, R. K., Nuwarda, R. F., Postma, M. J., & Suwantika, A. A. (2024). Vaccine hesitancy and equity: Lessons learned from the past and how they affect the COVID-19 countermeasure in Indonesia. Globalization and Health, 20(1), 11. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00987-w
  49. Smith, S. E., Sivertsen, N., Lines, L., & De Bellis, A. (2022). Decision making in vaccine hesitant parents and pregnant women – An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 4, 100062. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100062
  50. Stark, L. M., Power, M. L., Turrentine, M., Samelson, R., Siddiqui, M. M., Paglia, M. J., … Schulkin, J. (2016). Influenza vaccination among pregnant women: patient beliefs and medical provider practices. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2016, 3281975. doi: 10.1155/2016/3281975
  51. Tarcan, G., Karahan, A., & Sebik, N. B. (2023). Kısa Form Siberkondri (CSS-12) Ciddiyet Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği: Sağlık bilişimi alanına özel bir uygulama. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 26(1), 207-218.
  52. Turan, H. (2022). İnternet bağimliliği ve siberkondri. Balkan Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 21–27.
  53. Üzüm, Ö., Ince, G., Eliaçık, K., Kanık, A., Elmalı, F., & Helvacı, M. (2023). Investigating the potential connection between cyberchondria and vaccine hesitancy in high school students. Cureus, 15(1), e34218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34218
  54. Vismara, M., Benatti, B., Ferrara, L., Colombo, A., Bosi, M., Varinelli, A., … & Dell’Osso, B. (2022). A preliminary investigation of Cyberchondria and its correlates in a clinical sample of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders attending a tertiary psychiatric clinic. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 26(2), 111–122. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1927107
  55. Wang, R., Tao, L., Han, N., Liu, J., Yuan, C., Deng, L., … & Liu, J. (2021). Acceptance of seasonal influenza vaccination and associated factors among pregnant women in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in China: A multi-center cross-sectional study based on health belief model. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21, 745. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04224-3
  56. Xu, Y., Pan, C., Kong, P., & Shangguan, L. (2024). Relationship between the online health information search and vaccination behavior during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Public Health, 69, 1606850. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606850
  57. Çınar G, Akdemir-Kalkan İ, Yılmaz-Karadağ F., Hocaoğlu, M., Deniz, S., Işık, M.E.,. & Kaplan-Atalay, E. (2022). Gebelerin tetanos aşısıyla ilgili bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Retrieved 27 May 2025, from https://www.klimikdergisi.org/tr/2022/06/27/gebelerin-tetanos-asisina-yaklasimlari-2//