SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Mapping gendered dimensions of just transition in health: a bibliometric analysis of the female workforce

Sağlıkta adil geçişin toplumsal cinsiyet haritası: kadın sağlık işgücüne dair bibliyometrik bir analiz

Harika Şen(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3893-5587
Pages
431–438
Publication Date
2025-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This approach is not only essential for achieving sustainable development goals but also for constructing a future grounded in human dignity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction and objective; This study aims to examine how the concept of just transition is addressed not only in the context of environmental sustainability but also in relation to gender equality and health policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods; A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science database to identify publications focusing on the themes of “female health workforce,” “green jobs,” and “gender equality” (n=415).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This approach is not only essential for achieving sustainable development goals but also for constructing a future grounded in human dignity.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adil Geçiş · Sağlık Sektörü · Kadın İşgücü

Abstract

Introduction and objective; This study aims to examine how the concept of just transition is addressed not only in the context of environmental sustainability but also in relation to gender equality and health policy. Particular attention is given to how academic interest in the female health workforce has evolved on a global scale. Materials and methods; A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science database to identify publications focusing on the themes of “female health workforce,” “green jobs,” and “gender equality” (n=415). Bibliometric analysis was performed to map academic collaboration networks and thematic intensity clusters. Findings and conclusion; More than 70% of the 415 publications analyzed were produced after 2015. The most prominent research fields were sociology (13.25%), management (13.01%), and women’s studies (11.57%). The United States accounted for the largest share of publications (30.36%), while Turkey was represented with a significantly lower share (1.45%). In the keyword co-occurrence analysis, “gender” emerged as the most central concept, indicating that gender has become the main axis of the literature on just transition. Technological investments or green finance instruments alone are insufficient to implement just transition in the health sector. Rather, holistic and gender-equitable policies must be developed, which center on women's caregiving labor, leadership roles, and employment security. This approach is not only essential for achieving sustainable development goals but also for constructing a future grounded in human dignity.

Özet

Giriş ve amaç; Bu çalışma, adil geçiş kavramının yalnızca çevresel sürdürülebilirlik boyutunda değil, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği ve sağlık politikaları özelinde de nasıl ele alındığını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle kadın sağlık işgücüne yönelik akademik ilginin küresel ölçekte nasıl şekillendiği ortaya konulmuştur. Gereç ve yöntem; Araştırmada, Web of Science veri tabanında gerçekleştirilen sistematik tarama ile "kadın sağlık işgücü", "yeşil işler" ve "toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği" temalarını içeren yayınlar analiz edilmiştir. (n=415) Bibliyometrik çözümleme ile akademik işbirliği ağları ve tematik yoğunluk alanları incelenmiştir. Bulgular ve sonuç; İncelenen 415 yayının %70’inden fazlası 2015 sonrası dönemde üretilmiş; sosyoloji (%13,25), yönetim (%13,01) ve kadın çalışmaları (%11,57) en yoğun alanlar olmuştur. En çok katkı %30,36 oranla ABD’den gelirken, Türkiye yalnızca %1,45’lik payla literatürde düşük düzeyde temsil edilmiştir. Anahtar kelime analizinde “gender” kavramı en merkezi konumda yer almış ve toplumsal cinsiyetin adil geçiş literatürünün ana eksenini oluşturduğu saptanmıştır. Adil geçişin sağlık sektörü özelinde hayata geçirilebilmesi için yalnızca teknolojik yatırımlar veya yeşil finansman araçları yeterli değildir; kadınların bakım emeği, liderlik rolleri ve iş güvencesi temelinde şekillenen bütüncül ve eşitlikçi politikalar geliştirilmelidir. Bu yaklaşım, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinin ötesinde, insan onuruna yakışır bir gelecek inşası için zorunludur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şen, H. (2025). Mapping gendered dimensions of just transition in health: a bibliometric analysis of the female workforce. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 431–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/1538515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
  2. Biggerstaff, G., Frumkin, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Just transition in public health: Advancing environmental justice through health systems. Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(2), 024001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11324 Carli, L. L. (2020). Women, gender equality and COVID-19. Gender in Management, 35(7–8), 647–655.
  3. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
  4. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608 Cinamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 47(11–12), 531–541.
  5. Coe, I. R., Wiley, R., & Bekker, L. G. (2019). Organisational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine. The Lancet, 393, 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33127-5 Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  6. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361.
  7. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8.
  8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  9. Emslie, C., & Hunt, K. (2009). ‘Live to work’ or ‘work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work-life balance among men and women in mid-life. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 151–172.
  10. FAO. (2022). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  11. Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2015). The confidence cult(ure). Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 324–344.
  12. International Labour Organization. (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. ILO.
  13. IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  14. Kantamneni, N. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103439
  15. McKie, L., Hogg, G., & Miller, G. (2020). Feminist ethics and the gendered care economy in green policy. Journal of Social Policy, 49(3), 567–585.
  16. McMullan, A., Brown, G. D., & O’Sullivan, D. (2016). Preparing to care: Nurses’ perceptions of their undergraduate education. Nurse Education Today, 45, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.005
  17. NASA Sea Level Change Team. (2022). Sea level: Overview. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://sealevel.nasa.gov/
  18. Newman, C. J., Chama, P. K., Mugisha, M., & Matsiko, C. W. (2022). Gender and human resources for health: Unlocking gender-transformative policies in the health sector. Human Resources for Health, 20(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00731-3
  19. OECD. (2022). Gender equality in the health sector: Progress and challenges in the OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers.
  20. Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006
  21. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
  22. Rosenfeld, R. A., Trappe, H., & Gornick, J. C. (2004). Gender and work in Germany: Before and after reunification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 103–124.
  23. Scambor, E., Wojnicka, K., & Bergmann, N. (2014). Men and gender equality: European insights. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 552–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X 14558239
  24. Schag, C. A. C., Ganz, P. A., Lee, J. J., et al. (1994). Quality-of-life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 3(2), 127–141.
  25. Schilt, K. (2006). Just one of the guys? How transmen make gender visible at work. Gender & Society, 20(4), 465–490.
  26. Schilt, K., & Connell, C. (2007). Do workplace gender transitions make gender trouble? Gender, Work & Organization, 14(6), 596–618.
  27. Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., Knudsen, E. A., et al. (2017). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work-family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1601–1635.
  28. Smith, K., & Jacobson, H. (2024). Intersectionality of the gender wage gap among healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Healthcare, 13(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030273 TÜİK. (2023). Sağlık İşgücü İstatistikleri 2023. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
  29. UNEP. (2023). Adaptation gap report 2023: Underfinanced, underprepared—Inadequate investment and planning on climate adaptation leaves world exposed. United Nations Environment Programme.
  30. Watts, N., et al. (2021). The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Code red for a healthy future. The Lancet, 398(10311), 1619–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6
  31. WHO. (2019). Delivered by women, led by men: A gender and equity analysis of the global health workforce. World Health Organization.
  32. WHO. (2022). Health workforce support and safeguards during health system transition. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  33. Williams, J. C., Berdahl, J. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2012). Beyond work-life “integration”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100302.
  34. World Health Organization. (2019). Delivered by women, led by men: A gender and equity analysis of the global health and social workforce. WHO Press.
  35. World Health Organization. (2021). Climate change and health: Key facts (Fact sheet No. 391). https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health
  36. World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategic directions for nursing and midwifery 2021–2025. WHO Press. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/344562