SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research on Education and Psychology / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

The Mediating Role of Relationship Satisfaction Between Authenticity and Self-Esteem In Romantic Relationships

Ali Ammar Kurt(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8904-8091
Sinem Evin Akbay(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6189-1896
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that relationship satisfaction played a partial mediating role in the relationship between relationship authenticity and self-esteem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the mediating role of relationship satisfaction in the relationship between relationship authenticity and self-esteem of individuals in romantic relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 512 individuals, 370 females and 142 males.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that relationship satisfaction played a partial mediating role in the relationship between relationship authenticity and self-esteem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Romantic relationship · Self-esteem · Relationship satisfaction

Abstract

This study examines the mediating role of relationship satisfaction in the relationship between relationship authenticity and self-esteem of individuals in romantic relationships. Mediation analysis was conducted in this study using a correlational design. The study group consisted of 512 individuals, 370 females and 142 males. The findings revealed that relationship satisfaction played a partial mediating role in the relationship between relationship authenticity and self-esteem. These findings were discussed in the light of the related literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kurt, A. A., Akbay, S. E. (2024). The Mediating Role of Relationship Satisfaction Between Authenticity and Self-Esteem In Romantic Relationships. Research on Education and Psychology, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1413533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Akbay, S. E. (2015). Ana-babaya bağlanma ile romantik yakınlık ve otantik benlik arasındaki ilişkilerde bağlanma stillerinin aracı rolünün incelenmesi [An investigation of the relations between parental bonding with intimacy and authentic self in mediated by attachment style]. (Doctoral thesis). Mersin Üniversitesi [University of Mersin], Mersin.
  2. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis Group.
  3. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th Ed.). Routledge Falmer.
  4. Curun, F. (2001). The Effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Ensitüsü, Ankara.
  5. Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adölesanlarda Benlik Saygısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fak, Psikiyatri ABD Yayımlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
  6. Downing, V. L. (2008). Attachment style, relationship satisfaction, intimacy, loneliness, gender role beliefs, and the expression of authentic self in romantic relationships. University of Maryland, College Park.
  7. Gouveia, T., Schulz, M. S., & Costa, M. E. (2015). Authenticity in relationships: predicting caregiving and attachment in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000128
  8. Gecas, V. (1982). The Self-Concept. Annual Review of Sociology 8, 1-33.
  9. Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
  10. Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and Remodeling Writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388.
  11. Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Nezlek, J. B., Foster, J., Lakey, C. E., & Goldman, B. M. (2008). Within-person relationships among daily self-esteem, need satisfaction, and authenticity. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1140-1145.
  12. Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E. ve Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (2013). Psikolojik Danışmada Araştırma Yöntemleri (D. M. Siyez, Çev.). Mentis Yayıncılık.
  13. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98.
  14. Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multi-component conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances In Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 284 –357). Academic Press.
  15. Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033390
  16. Leary M.R., Baumeister R.F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In Zanna M.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Crossref.
  17. Lopez, F. & Rice, K. G. (2006). Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 362–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.362
  18. Luciano, E. C., & Orth, U. (2017). Transitions in romantic relationships and development of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 307-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000109
  19. Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755-773.
  20. Mruk, C. J. (2006). Defining Self-Esteem: An Often Overlooked Issue with Crucial Implications. In Self-Esteem Issues and Answers: A Sourcebook of Current Perspectives (Ed. M. H. Kernis) Routledge, Taylor&Francis.
  21. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
  22. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
  23. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. Basic Book.
  24. Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Exploring relationship satisfaction: a social exchange perspective on the interdependence between theory, research, and practice. Family Relations, 217-222.
  25. Swann, W. B., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and Identity. Handbook of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001016
  26. Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H.H. (1959). Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley.
  27. Tolman, D. L., & Porche, M. V. (2000). The Adolescent Femininity Ideology Scale: Development and Validation of a New Measure for Girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00219.x
  28. Wang YN (2015) Authenticity and Relationship Satisfaction: Two Distinct Ways of Directing Power to Self-Esteem. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0146050. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146050
  29. Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2011). The role of unstable self-esteem in the appraisal of romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.009