SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Impacts of Collector Radius and Height on Performance Parameters of Solar Chimney Power Plants: A Case Study for Manzanares, Spain

Harun Şen(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-3089-8678
Ayşe Pınar Mert Cüce(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6522-7092
Erdem Cüce(Recep Tayyip Erdogan University)0000-0003-0150-4705
Pages
83–104
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that increasing the collector area, which means increasing the energy entering the system, leads to a notable improvement in the power output of the pilot plant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, based on the Manzanares prototype, a typical SCPP system is considered with a collector height of 1.85 m, a chimney with a height of 194.6 m and a diameter of 10.16 m, and a collector with a radius of 122 m.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the 3D CFD model designed in ANSYS, the impacts of the change in the collector radius and collector height on the system performance are analysed by considering the turbulence effects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that increasing the collector area, which means increasing the energy entering the system, leads to a notable improvement in the power output of the pilot plant.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Solar chimney power plants · Collector radius · Collector height

Abstract

In this study, based on the Manzanares prototype, a typical SCPP system is considered with a collector height of 1.85 m, a chimney with a height of 194.6 m and a diameter of 10.16 m, and a collector with a radius of 122 m. With the 3D CFD model designed in ANSYS, the impacts of the change in the collector radius and collector height on the system performance are analysed by considering the turbulence effects. The numerical results are compared with the experimental data on the power output capacity of the pilot plant at different radiant fluxes and a good agreement is obtained. Then, by taking the chimney height and diameter constant, the numerical solutions are repeated for different collector radii in the range of 52.5-175 m. The results indicate that increasing the collector area, which means increasing the energy entering the system, leads to a notable improvement in the power output of the pilot plant. With a collector radius of 175 m, a power output of 95 kW can be obtained whereas it is 55 kW in the reference case with a collector radius of 122 m. Similarly, the solutions are repeated by changing the collector height between 1.1 and 4 m while keeping the other dimensions constant. It is seen that the increase in collector height negatively affects the performance of the system. It is observed that reducing the collector height to 1.1 m for the pilot plant can increase the power output to 61.77 kW.

Özet

In this study, based on the Manzanares prototype, a typical SCPP system is considered with a collector height of 1.85 m, a chimney with a height of 194.6 m and a diameter of 10.16 m, and a collector with a radius of 122 m. With the 3D CFD model designed in ANSYS, the impacts of the change in the collector radius and collector height on the system performance are analysed by considering the turbulence effects. The numerical results are compared with the experimental data on the power output capacity of the pilot plant at different radiant fluxes and a good agreement is obtained. Then, by taking the chimney height and diameter constant, the numerical solutions are repeated for different collector radii in the range of 52.5-175 m. The results indicate that increasing the collector area, which means increasing the energy entering the system, leads to a notable improvement in the power output of the pilot plant. With a collector radius of 175 m, a power output of 95 kW can be obtained whereas it is 55 kW in the reference case with a collector radius of 122 m. Similarly, the solutions are repeated by changing the collector height between 1.1 and 4 m while keeping the other dimensions constant. It is seen that the increase in collector height negatively affects the performance of the system. It is observed that reducing the collector height to 1.1 m for the pilot plant can increase the power output to 61.77 kW.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şen, H., Cüce, A. P. M., Cüce, E. (2021). Impacts of Collector Radius and Height on Performance Parameters of Solar Chimney Power Plants: A Case Study for Manzanares, Spain. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.53501/rteufemud.1017909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Abdelmohimen, M.A.H. Algarni, S.A. (2018). Numerical investigation of solar chimney power plants performance for Saudi Arabia weather conditions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.013
  2. Ahirwar, M. J., Sharma, P. (2019). Analyzing the Effect of Solar Chimney Power Plant by Varying Chimney Height, Collector Slope and Chimney Diverging Angle. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 6(7), 213-219.
  3. Al Alawin, A., Badran, O., Awad, A., Abdelhadi, Y., Al-Mofleh, A. (2012). Feasibility study of a solar chimney power plant in Jordan. Applied Solar Energy, 48(4), 260-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X12040020
  4. Ansys Inc, 2016. ANSYS Fluent 16 Theory Guide.
  5. Ayadi, A., Driss, Z., Bouabidi, A., Nasraoui, H., Bsisa, M., Abid, M. S. (2018). A computational and an experimental study on the effect of the chimney height on the thermal characteristics of a solar chimney power plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 232(4), 503-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0954408917719776
  6. Bouabidi, A., Ayadi, A., Nasraoui, H., Driss, Z., Abid, M. S. (2018). Study of solar chimney in Tunisia: Effect of the chimney configurations on the local flow characteristics. Energy and Buildings, 169, 27-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.049
  7. Cuce, E. and Bali, T. (2009). Variation of cell parameters of a p-Si PV cell with different solar irradiances and cell temperatures in humid climates. Fourth International Exergy, Energy and Environment Symposium. 19-23 April 2009, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
  8. Cuce, E. and Cuce, P.M. (2019a). Performance assessment of solar chimneys: Part 1 – Impact of chimney height on power output. Energy Research Journal, 10, 11-19.
  9. Cuce, E. and Cuce, P.M. (2019b). Performance assessment Energy Research Journal of solar chimneys: Part 2 – Impacts of slenderness value and collector slope on power output. Energy Research Journal, 10, 20-26.
  10. Cuce, E., Cuce, P.M., Sen, H. (2020a). A thorough performance assessment of solar chimney power plants: Case study for Manzanares. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 1, 100026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100026
  11. Cuce, E., Sen, H., Cuce, P.M. (2020b). Numerical performance modelling of solar chimney power plants: Influence of chimney height for a pilot plant in Manzanares, Spain. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 39, 100704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100704
  12. Cuce, P. M., Cuce, E., Sen, H. (2020c). Improving electricity production in solar chimney power plants with sloping ground design: an extensive CFD research. Journal of Solar Energy Research Updates, 7(1), 122-131. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31875/2410-2199.2020.07.9
  13. Cuce, E., Saxena, A., Cuce, P. M., Sen, H., Guo, S., Sudhakar, K. (2021). Performance assessment of solar chimney power plants with the impacts of divergent and convergent chimney geometry. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctaa097
  14. Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., Sen, H., Sudhakar, K., Berardi, U., Serencam, U. (2021b). Impacts of Ground Slope on Main Performance Figures of Solar Chimney Power Plants: A Comprehensive CFD Research with Experimental Validation. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6612222
  15. Dai, Y.J., Huang, H.B., Wang, R.Z. (2003). Case study of solar chimney power plants in Northwestern regions of China. Renewable Energy, 28(8), 1295-1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(02)00227-6
  16. Daimallah, A., Lebbi, M., Lounici, M. S., Boutina, L. (2020). Effect of Thermal Collector Height and Radius on Hydrodynamic Flow Control in Small Solar Chimney. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 71(2), 10-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.71.2.1025
  17. Das, P., Chandramohan, V. P. (2020). 3D numerical study on estimating flow and performance parameters of solar updraft tower (SUT) plant: Impact of divergent angle of chimney, ambient temperature, solar flux and turbine efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120353
  18. Dewangan, S. K. (2021). Effect of collector roof cum chimney divergence and exhaust fan on solar chimney power plant performance. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00426-9
  19. Dhahri, A. and Omri, A. (2013). A review of solar chimney power generation technology. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2(3), 1-17.
  20. Dhahri, A., Omri, A., Orfi, J. (2014). Numerical study of a solar chimney power plant. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 8(18), 1953-1965. DOI: https://dpi.org/10.19026/rjaset.8.1187
  21. dos Santos Bernardes, M.A., Von Backström, T.W., Kröger, D.G. (2009). Analysis of some available heat transfer coefficients applicable to solar chimney power plant collectors. Solar Energy, 83(2), 264-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.07.019
  22. Guo, P.H., Li, J.Y., Wang, Y. (2014). Numerical simulations of solar chimney power plant with radiation model. Renewable energy, 62, 24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.039
  23. Haaf, W., Friedrich, K., Mayr, G., Schlaich, J. (1983). Solar chimneys part I: principle and construction of the pilot plant in Manzanares. International Journal of Solar Energy, 2(1), 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425918308909911
  24. Haaf, W. (1984). Solar chimneys: part ii: preliminary test results from the Manzanares pilot plant. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2(2), 141-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425918408909921
  25. Hassan, A., Ali, M., Waqas, A. (2018). Numerical investigation on performance of solar chimney power plant by varying collector slope and chimney diverging angle. Energy, 142, 411-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.047
  26. Hoseini, H., Mehdipour, R. (2018). Evaluation of solar-chimney power plants with multiple-angle collectors. Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME), 8(1), 85-96. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22061/jcarme.2017.2282.1213
  27. Hu, S., Leung, D. Y., Chan, J. C. (2017). Impact of the geometry of divergent chimneys on the power output of a solar chimney power plant. Energy, 120, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.098
  28. Kashiwa, B.A., Kashiwa, C.B. (2008). The solar cyclone: A solar chimney for harvesting atmospheric water. Energy, 33(2), 331-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.06.003
  29. Keshari, S. R., Chandramohan, V. P., Das, P. (2021). A 3D numerical study to evaluate optimum collector inclination angle of Manzanares solar updraft tower power plant. Solar Energy, 226, 455-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.08.062
  30. Li, J. Y., Guo, P. H., Wang, Y. (2012). Effects of collector radius and chimney height on power output of a solar chimney power plant with turbines. Renewable Energy, 47, 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.018
  31. Mullett, L.B. (1987). The solar chimney-Overall efficiency, design and performance. International journal of ambient energy, 8(1), 35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.1987.9675512
  32. Nasraoui, H., Driss, Z., Kchaou, H. (2020). Effect of the chimney design on the thermal characteristics in solar chimney power plant. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 140(6), 2721-2732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09037-3
  33. Nizetic, S., Ninic, N., Klarin, B. (2008). Analysis and feasibility of implementing solar chimney power plants in the Mediterranean region. Energy, 33(11), 1680-1690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.05.012
  34. Pasumarthi, N. and Sherif, S.A. (1998a). Experimental and theoretical performance of a demonstration solar chimney model-Part I: mathematical model development. International Journal of Energy Research, 22(3), 277-288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(19980310)22:3 3.0.CO;2-R
  35. Pasumarthi, N. and Sherif, S.A. (1998b). Experimental and theoretical performance of a demonstration solar chimney model-Part II: experimental and theoretical results and economic analysis. International journal of energy research, 22(5), 443-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(199804)22:5 3.0.CO;2-V
  36. Schlaich, J., Bergermann, R., Schier W., Weinrebe, G. (2005). Design of commercial solar updraft tower systems utilization of solar induced convective flows for power generation. J Sol Energy Eng, 127(1), 117–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1823493
  37. Sen, H. and Cuce, E. (2020). Dynamic pressure distributions in solar chimney power plants: A numerical research for the pilot plant in Manzanares, Spain. WSSET Newsletter, 12(1), 2-2.
  38. Setareh, M. (2021). Comprehensive mathematical study on solar chimney powerplant. Renewable Energy, 175, 470-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.017
  39. Shahi, D.V.V., Gupta, M.A., Nayak, M.V.S. (2018). CFD Analysis of solar chimney wind power plant by Ansys Fluent. Int J Technol Res Eng, 5(9), 3746-3751.
  40. Tayebi, T., Djezzar, M., Gouidmi, H. (2018). 3D numerical study of flow in a solar chimney power plant system. Sciences & Technology, 3(1), 17-20.
  41. Toghraie, D., Karami, A., Afrand, M., Karimipour, A. (2018). Effects of geometric parameters on the performance of solar chimney power plants. Energy, 162, 1052-1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.086
  42. Xu, Y., Zhou, X. (2018). Performance of divergent-chimney solar power plants. Solar Energy, 170, 379-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.068
  43. Yapıcı, E. Ö., Ayli, E., Nsaif, O. (2020). Numerical investigation on the performance of a small scale solar chimney power plant for different geometrical parameters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122908
  44. Zandian, A., Ashjaee, M. (2013.) The thermal efficiency improvement of a steam Rankine cycle by innovative design of a hybrid cooling tower and a solar chimney concept. Renewable Energy, 51, 465-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.051
  45. Zhou, X., Yang, J., Xiao, B., Hou, G. (2007) Experimental study of temperature field in a solar chimney power setup. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27(11-12), 2044-2050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.12.007
  46. Zhou, X., Yang, J., Xiao, B., Hou, G., Xing, F. (2009). Analysis of chimney height for solar chimney power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29(1), 178-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.02.014