Journals / NATURENGS / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Abrage Defect Detection Using Transfer Learning Methods

Lutfi Emre Demir(KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING)0009-0006-0497-3178
Yavuz Canbay(KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING)0000-0003-2316-7893
Journal
NATURENGS
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-09
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Xception model demonstrated the highest performance with 91% accuracy and 93% recall, emerging as the most ideal solution in terms of speed-performance balance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents a deep learning-based approach for the automatic detection of Abrage defects in the textile industry, which arise due to variations in dye uptake or irregularities in raw materials during yarn production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim is to develop a system that provides objectivity and continuity, replacing traditional control processes that rely on human observation and are costly and prone to high error rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Xception model demonstrated the highest performance with 91% accuracy and 93% recall, emerging as the most ideal solution in terms of speed-performance balance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deep Learning · Transfer Learning · Yarn Fault

Abstract

This study presents a deep learning-based approach for the automatic detection of Abrage defects in the textile industry, which arise due to variations in dye uptake or irregularities in raw materials during yarn production. A review of the literature reveals that while there are numerous studies on weaving or knitting defects on textile surfaces, there is a notable lack of research on the detection of Abrage defects—which occur on yarn bobbins and directly affect product quality. The aim is to develop a system that provides objectivity and continuity, replacing traditional control processes that rely on human observation and are costly and prone to high error rates. Within the scope of the research, a unique dataset consisting of yarn bobbin images captured under UV light in a controlled experimental environment was utilized. Preprocessing steps such as grayscale conversion, background removal, and masking of conical sections were applied to the images. A dataset consisting of 235 images was created using data augmentation methods. In the study, transfer learning models—including InceptionV3, DenseNet121, VGG16, MobileNetV2, Xception, EfficientNetB3, and InceptionResNetV2, all pre-trained on ImageNet weights—were compared alongside a CNN architecture. Experimental results were analyzed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The Xception model demonstrated the highest performance with 91% accuracy and 93% recall, emerging as the most ideal solution in terms of speed-performance balance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, L. E., Canbay, Y. (2026). Abrage Defect Detection Using Transfer Learning Methods. NATURENGS, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.1917941

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Ngan, H.Y., Pang, G.K., and Yung, N.H., (2011). Automated fabric defect detection—A review. Image and vision computing, 29, 442-458.
  2. Wu, W., Zhang, Z., Xiang, Z., and Qian, M., (2025). Texture-Adaptive Fabric Defect Detection via Dynamic Subspace Feature Extraction and Luminance Reconstruction. Algorithms, 18, 638.
  3. Maleki, M., (2011). Artificial neural network prosperities in textile applications. Artificial Neural Networks Industrial And Control Engineering Applications, 35.
  4. Ingle, N., and Jasper, W.J., (2025). A review of the evolution and concepts of deep learning and AI in the textile industry. Textile Research Journal, 95, 1709-1737.
  5. Gültekin, E., Çelik, H.İ., Dülger, L.C., Sünbül, H.İ., and Kani, H., (2019). Image processing applications on yarn characteristics and fault inspection. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 26, 340-345.
  6. Dulkadir, B., (2025). İşletmelerde Harman Reçetesiyle Balya Dizilim Planının Python Programlama Diliyle Hazırlanarak Abrajın Önlenmesi. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 134-151.
  7. Valarmathi, K., Mathina, P., Mahalakshmi, S., Santhiya, P., and Pavithra, J., (2025). Enhanced Deep Learning for Real-Time Fabric Defect Detection in Textile Manufacturing. 2025 6th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 1-5.
  8. Tang, J., Zhang, A., and Liu, W., (2025). A novel dual-student reverse knowledge distillation method for magnetic tile defect detection. Scientific Reports, 15.
  9. Song, W., Lang, D., Zhang, J., Zheng, M., and Li, X., (2025). Textile defect detection algorithm based on the improved yolov8. IEEE Access, 13, 11217-11231.
  10. Machado, R., Barros, L.A., Vieira, V., Silva, F.D.d., Costa, H., and Carvalho, V., (2025). Textile defect detection using artificial intelligence and computer vision—a preliminary deep learning approach. Electronics, 14, 3692.
  11. Muraina, I., (2022). Ideal dataset splitting ratios in machine learning algorithms: general concerns for data scientists and data analysts. 7th international Mardin Artuklu scientific research conference, 496-504.
  12. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A., (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.
  13. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z., (2016). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2818-2826.
  14. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q., (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 4700-4708.
  15. Chollet, F., (2017). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1251-1258.
  16. Howard, A.G., (2017). Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.
  17. Tan, M., and Le, Q., (2019). Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International conference on machine learning.
  18. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A., (2017). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.
  19. Padilla, R., Passos, W.L., Dias, T.L., Netto, S.L., and Da Silva, E.A., (2021). A comparative analysis of object detection metrics with a companion open-source toolkit. Electronics, 10, 279.
  20. Juba, B., and Le, H.S., (2019). Precision-recall versus accuracy and the role of large data sets. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 4039-4048.
  21. Obi, J.C., (2023). A comparative study of several classification metrics and their performances on data. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 8, 308-314.
  22. Lipton, Z.C., Elkan, C., and Naryanaswamy, B., (2014). Optimal thresholding of classifiers to maximize F1 measure. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, Nancy, France.
  23. Sathyanarayanan, S., and Tantri, B.R., (2024). Confusion matrix-based performance evaluation metrics. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27, 4023-4031.
  24. Canbay, Y., Adsiz, S., and Canbay, P., (2024). Privacy-preserving transfer learning framework for kidney disease detection. Applied Sciences, 14, 8629.
  25. Naidu, G., Zuva, T., and Sibanda, E.M., (2023). A review of evaluation metrics in machine learning algorithms. Computer science on-line conference, 15-25.