SavedAdd your journal

Journals / NATURENGS / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

The Impact of COVID-19 on Market Risk of S&P 500 Companies

Osman Erdem(Coppell High School)0009-0004-9327-5034
Selin Dik(Auburn High School)0009-0009-7456-9666
Journal
NATURENGS
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings suggest that market risk, as measured by beta, declined in the post-pandemic period, potentially indicating a shift in investor risk perception or structural changes in market dynamics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on market risk by analyzing the beta values of 457 companies within the S&P 500 index.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We collected daily stock prices from January 1, 2017, to December 28, 2023, excluding the year 2020 due to the excessive, unexpected fluctuations in the market at the given time period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings suggest that market risk, as measured by beta, declined in the post-pandemic period, potentially indicating a shift in investor risk perception or structural changes in market dynamics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Beta · Systematic Risk · COVID-19

Abstract

This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on market risk by analyzing the beta values of 457 companies within the S&P 500 index. We collected daily stock prices from January 1, 2017, to December 28, 2023, excluding the year 2020 due to the excessive, unexpected fluctuations in the market at the given time period. To assess changes in systematic risk, we compared beta values across four time windows—3-year, 2-year, 1-year, and 9-month—before and after COVID-19. Our analysis revealed a consistent decline in beta values across all time frames. Specifically, the average beta decreased from 0.919 to 0.537 in the 3-year window, from 0.910 to 0.652 in the 2-year window, from 0.965 to 0.907 in the 1-year window, and from 0.972 to 0.908 in the 9-month window. These findings suggest that market risk, as measured by beta, declined in the post-pandemic period, potentially indicating a shift in investor risk perception or structural changes in market dynamics.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdem, O., Dik, S. (2026). The Impact of COVID-19 on Market Risk of S&P 500 Companies. NATURENGS, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.1854103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Chu, H., (2023). Covid-19’s impact on stocks relative risks. ACM Digital Library, 7, 129 - 133.
  2. Walker, J.S., Geyfman, V. and Tektali, N. (2020). An examination of the stability of bank betas during extreme market volatility: The case of the financial crisis and the pandemic, Journal of Banking and Finance Studies, 12, 1–15.
  3. Ambelal, M. and Sebastian, A. (2021). An analysis of the impact of a pandemic on the performance of pharmaceutical stocks, African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 16(4): 7–30.
  4. Raja, M.A.S., Shekar, K., Harshith, B. and Rastogi, P. (2023). A study on the impact of COVID-19 on the stock market in BRIC countries, EconPapers, 111C, 1–26.
  5. Goodell, J.W. (2020). COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research, Finance Research Letters, 35: 101512.
  6. Coşkun, Y., Akinsomi, O., Gil-Alana, L. and Yaya, O. (2023). Stock market responses to COVID-19: The behaviors of mean reversion, dependence and persistence, Heliyon, 9(4), e15084.
  7. Rizaldi, F., and Wahyudi, I., (2016). The effect of firm and stock characteristics on stock returns: Stock market crash analysis. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2(2), 112-124.
  8. Lakonishok, J. and Shapiro, A.C. (1984). Stock returns, beta, variance and size: An empirical analysis, Financial Analysts Journal, 40(4): 36–41.
  9. Mikołajek-Gocejna, M. (2021). Estimation, instability, and non-stationarity of beta coefficients for twenty-four emerging markets in 2005-2021. European Research Studies Journal, 24(4), 370 - 395.