SavedAdd your journal

Journals / NATURENGS / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Use of Plant Species as Environmental Indicators

Burak Sürmen(KARAMANOGLU MEHMETBEY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4055-613X
Hakan Yılmaz(ORDU UNIVERSITY, AKKUŞ VOCATIONAL SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY)0000-0002-0113-8277
Hamdi Güray Kutbay(ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY, BIOLOGY PR.)0000-0001-9511-9159
Journal
NATURENGS
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Estimating indicator values from regional floristic data can provide a practical, low-cost alternative to time-consuming field measurements and support assessments of environmental gradients and the magnitude of ecological change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biological indicators are defined based on the specific responses of organisms to their environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For plants, several classification systems have been developed; among the most widely used is Ellenberg’s Ecological Indicator Values (EIVs).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Estimating indicator values from regional floristic data can provide a practical, low-cost alternative to time-consuming field measurements and support assessments of environmental gradients and the magnitude of ecological change.
🔬Design:Review
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ellenberg indicator values · bioindication · vegetation ecology

Abstract

Biological indicators are defined based on the specific responses of organisms to their environment. For plants, several classification systems have been developed; among the most widely used is Ellenberg’s Ecological Indicator Values (EIVs). EIVs assign ordinal scores to species along major environmental gradients and allow inference of site conditions from species composition. Ellenberg proposed indicator values for seven factors; light (L), moisture (F), soil reaction (R), nitrogen (N), salinity (S), temperature (T) and continentality (K) derived from species’ realized niches. Site (community) indicator values are commonly calculated by weighted averaging of species indicator values using cover/abundance data, and the resulting means are interpreted within recommended value ranges. In Europe, EIVs have been used extensively to characterize vegetation types and to track ecological change; in Turkey their use is increasing but still limited, and values transferred from Central Europe may not always reflect local conditions. Estimating indicator values from regional floristic data can provide a practical, low-cost alternative to time-consuming field measurements and support assessments of environmental gradients and the magnitude of ecological change.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sürmen, B., Yılmaz, H., Kutbay, H. G. (2026). Use of Plant Species as Environmental Indicators. NATURENGS, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.1856357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Ellenberg, H., (1988). Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. fourth ed. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Braun-Blanquet, J., (1964). Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer.
  3. Westhoff, V. and van der Maarel, E. (1978). The Braun-Blanquet approach. In Classification of Plant Communities (pp. 287–399). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  4. Diekmann, M. (2003). Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – A review. Basic Appl. Ecol., 4(6): 493-506.
  5. Zelený, D. and Schaffers, A. P. (2012). Too good to be true: Pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses. J. Veg. Sci., 23(3): 419-431.
  6. Kılıç, D. D., Kutbay, H. G., Sürmen, B. and Hüseyinoğlu, R. (2018). The classification of some plants subjected to disturbance factors (grazing and cutting) based on ecological strategies in Turkey. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat., 29(1): 87–102.
  7. Mueller-Dombois, D., and Ellenberg, H., (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley.
  8. Roseberry, J. L. and Woolf, A. (1998). Habitat-population density relationships for white-tailed deer in Illinois. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 36: 252-258.
  9. Grime, J.P., (2001). Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. Wiley.
  10. Schaffers, A. P. and Sýkora, K. V. (2000). Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: A comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci., 11(2): 225-244.
  11. Balkovič, J., Kollár, J. and Šimonovič, V. (2012). Experience with using Ellenberg’s R indicator values in Slovakia: Oligotrophic and mesotrophic submontane broad-leaved forests. Biologia., 67: 474-482.
  12. Wamelink, G. W. W., Joosten, V., van Dobben, H. F. and Berendse, F. (2002). Validity of Ellenberg indicator values judged from physico-chemical field measurements. J. Veg. Sci., 13(2): 269-278.
  13. Boulanger, V., Baltzinger, C., Saïd, S., Ballon, P., Picard, J. F. and Dupouey, J. L. (2015). Decreasing deer browsing pressure influenced understory vegetation dynamics over 30 years. Ann. For. Sci., 72: 367-378.
  14. Rahmstorf, S. and Ganopolski, A. (1999). Long-term global warming scenarios computed with an efficient coupled climate model. Clim. Change., 43: 353-367.
  15. Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M. and Gascon, C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots. In Biodiversity Hotspots (pp. 3–22). Berlin: Springer.
  16. Mountford, J. O. and Chapman, J. M. (1993). Water regime requirements of British wetland vegetation: Using the moisture classification of Ellenberg and Londo. J. Environ. Manag., 38(4): 275-288.
  17. Kasprowicz, M. (2010). Acidophilous oak forests of the Wielkopolska region (West Poland) against the background of Central Europe. Biodiv. Res. Conserv., 20: 1-212.
  18. Kutbay, H. G. and Sürmen, B. (2013). Determination of Ellenberg’s indicator values along an elevational gradient in central Black Sea region of Turkey. Sains Malays., 42(10): 1387–1393.
  19. Sürmen, B., Kutbay, H. G., Kılıç, D. D., Hüseyinova, R. and Kılınç, M. (2014). Ellenberg’s indicator values for soil nitrogen concentration and pH in selected swamp forests in the Central Black Sea region of Turkey. Turk. J. Bot., 38(5): 883-895.