SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Natural and Engineering Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

The Gut Contents of the Squalius cii in a Permanently Interrupted River System, the Karamenderes River

Nurbanu Partal(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7203-8129
Şükran Yalçın Özdilek(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8264-7606
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-04-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The S. cii specimens were fed on high-quality foods in the upper section of the dam.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal of this study was to determine the temporal and spatial distribution of the gut contents of Squalius cii specimens in a permanently interrupted Karamenderes River.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The specimens were sampled at seven distinct locations along the Karamenderes River in summer 2012, autumn 2012, and spring 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The S. cii specimens were fed on high-quality foods in the upper section of the dam.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 · 157 specimens
⚙️Variables:Index of relative importance (IRI) · niche breadth · trophic level

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the temporal and spatial distribution of the gut contents of Squalius cii specimens in a permanently interrupted Karamenderes River. The specimens were sampled at seven distinct locations along the Karamenderes River in summer 2012, autumn 2012, and spring 2013. The gut contents of a total of 157 specimens were examined. The data on the identified food organisms were quantified as the percentage of the index of relative importance (IRI%), niche breadth (BA), trophic level (TL), feeding intensity (Vacuity Index, VI), and food diversity (H’). In all seasons, the examined specimens were found to mostly feed on the members of the Insecta family in the river's upper section and on Bacillariophyceae and macrophytes in the lower section. The feeding intensity was found to be the highest in spring 2013, while the food diversity was realized to exhibit the highest value (2.21) at the Karaköy 1 site in summer 2012. The niche breadth of the examined specimens varied between 0.01 and 0.73, whereas their trophic levels ranged between 2.01 and 3.48. The S. cii specimens were fed on high-quality foods in the upper section of the dam.

🔖

Cite This Article

Partal, N., Özdilek, Ş. Y. (2022). The Gut Contents of the Squalius cii in a Permanently Interrupted River System, the Karamenderes River. Natural and Engineering Sciences, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1098670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Alanärä, A., Burns, M. D., & Metcalfe, N. B. (2001). Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: the temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70(6), 980-986. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00550.x
  2. Alexandre, C. M., Ferreira, T. F., & Almeida, P. R. (2013). Fish assemblages in non‐regulated and regulated rivers from permanent and temporary Iberian systems. River Research and Applications, 29(8), 1042-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2591
  3. Altındağ, A., (1997) Reproduction and feeding of the chub (Leuciscus cephalus L., 1758) in Akşehir Lake (Konya). Tr. J. Zool. 21, 229–239.
  4. Baba, A., Deniz, O., & Gülen, O. (2007). Effects of Mining Activities on Water around the Çanakkale Plain, Turkey. (M. K. Zaidi, Ed.), NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Wastewater Reuse–Risk Assessment, Decision-Making and Environmental Security. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  5. Bakaç, I. (2018). Assessment of Distribution and Abundance of Freshwater Fish in Çanakkale, Turkey. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
  6. Balestrieri A, Prigioni C, Remonti L, Sgrosso S, Priore G (2006). Feeding ecology of Leuciscus cephalus and Rutilus rubilio in southern Italy. Ital J Zool 73: 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000600679561
  7. Başdemir, D., Balık, S., & Ilhan, A. (2010). Some Biological Features of Danube Bleak, Alburnus chalcoides (Guldenstadt, 1772) Population in Çakırkoy Brook (Yenice-Çanakkale). E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 27(4), 157-160.
  8. Baumgartner, L. J. (2007). Diet and feeding habits of predatory fishes upstream and downstream of a low‐level weir. Journal of Fish Biology, 70(3), 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01352.x
  9. Baxter, R. M. (1977). Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 8(1), 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.001351
  10. Bogutskaya, N. G. (1997). Contribution to the knowledge of Leuciscine fishes of Asia Minor. Part 2. An annotated check-list of Leuciscine fishes (Leuciscinae, Cyprinidae) of Turkey with descriptions of a new species and two new subspecies. Mitteilungen aus dem hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 94, 161-186.
  11. Branco, P., Amaral, S. D., Ferreira, M. T., & Santos, J. M. (2017). Do small barriers affect the movement of freshwater fish by increasing residency?. Science of the Total Environment, 581, 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.156
  12. Caffrey, J. M., Acevedo, S., Gallagher, K., & Britton, R. (2008). Chub (Leuciscus cephalus): a new potentially invasive fish species in Ireland. Aquatic Invasions, 3(2), 201-209. https://doi: 10.3391/ai.2008.3.2.11
  13. Collins, S. L., & Glenn, S. M. (1991). Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology, 72(2), 654-664. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937205
  14. Cortés, E. (1999). Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56(5), 707-717. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0489
  15. Çiçek, E., Sungur, S., & Fricke, R. (2020). Freshwater lampreys and fishes of Turkey; a revised and updated annotated checklist 2020. Zootaxa, 4809(2), 241-270. https://doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4809.2.2
  16. Geiger, M. F., Herder, F., Monaghan, M. T., Almada, V., Barbieri, R., Bariche, M.,. & Freyhof, J. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14(6), 1210-1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12257
  17. Hyslop, E. J. (1980). Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17(4), 411-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.x
  18. Kottelat, M. (1997). European freshwater fishes. An heuristic checklist of the freshwater fishes of Europe (exclusive of former USSR), with an introduction for non-systematists and comments on nomenclature and conservation. Biologia (Bratislava), 52(5), 1-271.
  19. Kottelat, M., & Freyhof, J. (2007). Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat.
  20. Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations (No. 2). Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University.
  21. Magoulick, D. D., & Kobza, R. M. (2003). The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology, 48(7), 1186-1198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01089.x
  22. Mann, R. H. K. (1976). Observations on the age, growth, reproduction and food of the chub Squalius cephalus (L.) in the River Stour, Dorset. Journal of Fish Biology, 8(3), 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1976.tb03950.x
  23. Marković, G. (2007b). A contribution to data on chub (Leuciscus cephalus L., Cyprinidae, Pisces) diet in river conditions. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 12(24), 13-18.
  24. Marković, G. S., Simić, V. M., Ostojić, A. M., & Simić, S. B. (2007a). Seasonal variation in nutrition of chub (Leuciscus cephalus L., Cyprinidae, Osteichthyes) in one reservoir of West Serbia. Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke, (112), 107-113.
  25. Nastova-Gjorgjioska, R., Kostov, V., & Georgiev, S. (1997). Nutrition of chub Leuciscus cephalus (Linnaeasus, 1758) from river Babuna. Croatian Journal of Fisheries: Ribarstvo, 55(2), 53-65.
  26. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’hara, R. B.,. & Oksanen, M. J. (2013). Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version, 2(9), 1-295.
  27. Oliva-Paterna, F. J., Miñnano, P. A., & Torralva, M. (2003). Habitat quality affects the condition of Barbus sclateri in Mediterranean semi-arid streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 67(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024481928161
  28. Özuluğ, M., & Freyhof, J. (2011). Revision of the genus Squalius in Western and Central Anatolia, with description of four new species (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 22(2), 107.
  29. Piria, M., Treer, T., Aničić, I., Safner, R., & Odak, T. (2005). The natural diet of five cyprinid fish species. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 70(1), 21-28.
  30. Poff, N. L., & Ward, J. V. (1990). Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management, 14(5), 629. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394714
  31. Power, M. E. (1992). Top‐down and bottom‐up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy. Ecology, 73(3), 733-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940153
  32. Qicai, L. (2011). Influence of dams on river ecosystem and its countermeasures. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2011. https://doiI:10.4236/jwarp.2011.31007
  33. RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/ Sánchez-Pérez, A., Oliva-Paterna, F. J., Amat-Trigo, F., & Torralva, M. (2021). Variability in Population Traits of a Sentinel Iberian Fish in a Highly Modified Mediterranean-Type River. Water, 13(6), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060747
  34. Sarı, H. M., Balık, S., Ustaoğlu, M. R., & Ilhan, A. (2006). Distribution and ecology of freshwater ichthyofauna of the Biga peninsula, North-western Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30(1), 35-45.
  35. Schlosser, I. J. (1982). Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs, 52(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937352
  36. Schoener, T. W. (1974). The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology, 49(4), 704-726. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935534
  37. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  38. Stoumboudi, M. T., Kottelat, M., & Barbieri, R. (2006). The fishes of the inland waters of Lesbos Island, Greece. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 17(2), 129.
  39. Sun, J., & Liu, D. (2003). Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 25(11), 1331-1346. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbg096
  40. Ünver, B., & Erk’akan, F. (2011). Diet composition of chub, Squalius cephalus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), in lake Tödürge, Sivas, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27(6), 1350-1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01766.x
  41. Vander Zanden, M. J., Cabana, G., & Rasmussen, J. B. (1997). Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54(5), 1142-1158. https://doi.org/10.1139/f97-016
  42. Vengadesh Perumal, N., Rajkumar, M., Perumal, P., & Rajasekar, K. T. (2009). Seasonal variations of plankton diversity in the Kaduviyar estuary, Nagapattinam, southeast coast of India. J. Environ. Biol, 30(6), 1035-1046.
  43. Wang, S., Tang, J. P., Su, L. H., Fan, J. J., Chang, H. Y., Wang, T. T.,. & Yang, Y. (2019). Fish feeding groups, food selectivity, and diet shifts associated with environmental factors and prey availability along a large subtropical river, China. Aquatic Sciences, 81(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0628-1
  44. Yalçın Özdilek, Ş., & Jones, R. I. (2014). The diet composition and trophic position of introduced Prussian carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) and native fish species in a Turkish river. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14(3), 769-776.
  45. Yalçın Özdilek, Ş. (2017). Seasonal and ontogenetic diet shift of two sympatric cyprinid fish species from the temperate Karamenderes River, Çanakkale, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 41(1), 67-81. https://doi:10.3906/zoo-1603-34
  46. Yalçın Özdilek, Ş., Partal, N., & Jones, R. I. (2019). An invasive species, Carassius gibelio, alters the native fish community through trophic niche competition. Aquatic Sciences, 81(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0623-6
  47. Geiger, M. F., Herder, F., Monaghan, M. T., Almada, V., Barbieri, R., Bariche, M.,. & Freyhof, J. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14(6), 1210-1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12257
  48. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’hara, R. B.,. & Oksanen, M. J. (2013). Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version, 2(9), 1-295.
  49. Wang, S., Tang, J. P., Su, L. H., Fan, J. J., Chang, H. Y., Wang, T. T.,. & Yang, Y. (2019). Fish feeding groups, food selectivity, and diet shifts associated with environmental factors and prey availability along a large subtropical river, China. Aquatic Sciences, 81(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0628-1