SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATION OF COVERAGE AREAS OF 2.4 GHz AND 5 GHz MONOPOL ANTENNAS FOR DIFFERENT WALL PARAMETERS

2.4 GHz Ve 5 GHz Monopol Antenlerin Farklı Duvar Parametreleri İçin Kapsama Alanlarının İncelenmesi

Hüseyin Tarık Niş(ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8112-9719
Mehmet Barış Tabakcıoğlu(BURSA TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1607-355X
Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2024-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analyzes and comparisons made, it was determined that the 2.4 GHz modem provided more coverage than the 5 GHz modem, and it was also observed that the wooden feature wall provided the best coverage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The coverage areas of these Wi-Fi modules, where the operating frequency is different, vary depending on location in a house and the characteristics of the walls of the rooms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To investigate the effect of these parameters on the coverage areas, a house was designed, and modems containing 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz antennas were placed in the rooms for three different locations in the house.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analyzes and comparisons made, it was determined that the 2.4 GHz modem provided more coverage than the 5 GHz modem, and it was also observed that the wooden feature wall provided the best coverage.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CEM · Monopol Anten · Uzak Alan Işıması

Abstract

The coverage areas of these Wi-Fi modules, where the operating frequency is different, vary depending on location in a house and the characteristics of the walls of the rooms. To investigate the effect of these parameters on the coverage areas, a house was designed, and modems containing 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz antennas were placed in the rooms for three different locations in the house. In addition, the thickness of the walls and the effect of the material of which the wall is made on the coverage area were examined. Before the analyzes were carried out, far-field radiation was obtained for monopole antennas at 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies. Then radiation analysis was carried out inside the house with the obtained far-field radiation data. As a result of the analyzes and comparisons made, it was determined that the 2.4 GHz modem provided more coverage than the 5 GHz modem, and it was also observed that the wooden feature wall provided the best coverage.

Özet

Çalışma frekansının farklı olduğu bu Wi-Fi modullerinin kapsama alanları bir evin içerisindeki konumu ve odaların duvarlarının özellikleri çeşitli parametrelere bağlı olarak değişmektedir. Kapsama alanlarının üzerinde bu parametrelerin etkisinin araştırılması için bir ev tasarlanmış ve ev içerisindeki 3 farklı konum için odalara 2.4 GHz ve 5 GHz yayın yapan antenler içeren modemler yerleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca duvarların kalınlığı ve duvarın yapıldığı malzemenin kapsama alanına etkisi incelenmiştir. Analizler gerçekleştirilmeden önce 2.4 GHz ve 5 GHz frekansındaki monopol antenler için uzak alan ışıması elde edilmiş ve sonrasında elde edilen uzak alan ışıma verileriyle konut içerisindeki ışıma analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler ve kıyaslamalar sonucunda 2.4 GHz modemin 5 GHz modeme göre daha fazla kapsama alanı sağladığı tespit edilmiş ve ayrıca, ahşap özellikli duvarın en iyi kapsama alanını sağladığı gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Niş, H. T., Tabakcıoğlu, M. B. (2024). INVESTIGATION OF COVERAGE AREAS OF 2.4 GHz AND 5 GHz MONOPOL ANTENNAS FOR DIFFERENT WALL PARAMETERS. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46387/bjesr.1339193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. P. Shanmugaapriyan, H. Chitra, E. Aiswarya, V. Balasubramanian, and S. Ashok Kumar, “A pragmatic approach for effective indoor localization using IEEE 802.11 n”, Ad-hoc Networks and Wireless: ADHOC-NOW 2014 International Workshops, ETSD, MARSS, MWaoN, SecAN, SSPA, and WiSARN, pp. 203-216, Benidorm, 2014.
  2. A. Belay, L. Yen, S. Renu, H. P. Lin, and S. S. Jeng, “Indoor localization at 5GHz using Dynamic machine learning approach (DMLA)”, International Conference on Applied System Innovation, pp. 1763-1766, 2017.
  3. Y. Kaplan, and C. Göçen, “A Dual-Band Antenna Design for 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi Applications”, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 34, pp. 685-688, 2022.
  4. Ł. Chruszczyk, A. Zając, and D. Grzechca, “Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WLAN network for purpose of indoor and outdoor location”, International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 62, 2016.
  5. M. Sibley, “Introduction to electromagnetism”, Elsevier., 1995.
  6. G. Verhoeven, “The reflection of two fields: electromagnetic radiation and its role in (aerial) imaging”, AARGnews, vol. 55, pp. 13-18, 2017.
  7. A.M. Abdelgader, and W. Lenan, “The physical layer of the IEEE 802.11 p WAVE communication standard: The specifications and challenges”, World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 2, pp. 22-24, 2014.
  8. I. Alimi, A. Shahpari, A. Sousa, R. Ferreira, P. Monteiro, and A. Teixeira, “Challenges and opportunities of optical wireless communication technologies”, Optical Communication Technology, vol. 10, 2017.
  9. E. Anderson, C. Phillips, D. Sicker, and D.Grunwald, ”Modeling environmental effects on directionality in wireless networks”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, pp. 2078-2092, 2011.
  10. J. McLean, R. Sutton, and R. Hoffman, “Interpreting Antenna Performance Parameters for EMC Applications: Part 2: Radiation Pattern, Gain, and Directivity”, TDK RF Solutions Inc.
  11. L.A. Dorado, and V. Trainotti, “Simplified calculation of ground losses in low-and medium-frequency antenna systems”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 48, pp. 70-81, 2006.
  12. K. Pahlavan, and P. Krishnamurthy, "Evolution and impact of Wi-Fi technology and applications: A historical perspective", International Journal of Wireless Information Networks,vol. 28, pp. 3-19, 2021.
  13. S. Lepaja,, A. Maraj, and S. Berzati, “WLAN planning and performance evaluation for commercial applications”, Data-Centric Business and Applications: Evolvements in Business Information Processing and Management, vol. 1, pp. 53-69, 2019.
  14. J. Wieart, “Radio-Frequency Human Exposure Assessment. From deterministic to Stohastic Methods”, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  15. U. Sorgucu, and I. Develi, “Measurement and analysis of electromagnetic pollution generated by GSM-900 mobile phone networks in Erciyes University, Turkey”, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 404-415, 2012.
  16. I. Prlić, J. Šiško, V.M. Varnai, L. Pavelić, J. Macan, S. Kobešćak, and S.C. Avdagić, “Wi-Fi technology and human health impact: a brief review of current knowledge”, Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 94-106, 2022.
  17. S. Lepaja,, A. Maraj, and S. Berzati, “WLAN planning and performance evaluation for commercial applications”, Data-Centric Business and Applications: Evolvements in Business Information Processing and Management, vol. 1, pp. 53-69, 2019.