SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

The Effect of Different Application Doses of Commercial Vermicompost on Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Seedling Development and Rhizosphere Biological Properties

Ticari Vermikompostun Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) Fide gelişimi ve Rizosfer Biyolojik Özelliklerine Farklı Uygulama Dozlarının Etkisi

Meral Ödemiş(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-8750-8154
Çiğdem Küçük(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5688-5440
Pages
325–332
Publication Date
2025-12-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Field trials are also needed to confirm our results from pot experiments under greenhouse conditions and to demonstrate that vermicompost can be used as a biofertilizer for plant and soil health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the effect of vermicompost applied to soils at different doses on the biological properties of barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.) seedlings and rhizosphere.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Five different doses of vermicompost (control (0), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%) were applied to the soil and the experiment was conducted in pots.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Field trials are also needed to confirm our results from pot experiments under greenhouse conditions and to demonstrate that vermicompost can be used as a biofertilizer for plant and soil health.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Enzimatik aktivite · Fide gelişimi · Rizosfer

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of vermicompost applied to soils at different doses on the biological properties of barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.) seedlings and rhizosphere. Five different doses of vermicompost (control (0), 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10%) were applied to the soil and the experiment was conducted in pots. At the end of harvest, biomass and root length, biomass and root weights, leaf water content, chlorophyll amount and some biological properties of rhizosphere soil of barley plants were examined. While 10% vermicompost dose was found to be effective on barley seedling height, root length, leaf water content, biomass fresh and dry weight, 7.5% application dose was effective on chlorophyll amount, root fresh and dry weight. The application doses increased the Fe, Mg, K, and P contents of the leaves compared to the control. The highest Mn and Zn contents were obtained with the 7.5% dose. The 7.5% vermicompost dose increased the CO2 content in the rhizosphere, and the 10% application had an effect on enzyme activity. Field trials are also needed to confirm our results from pot experiments under greenhouse conditions and to demonstrate that vermicompost can be used as a biofertilizer for plant and soil health.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, arpa (Hordeum vulgaris L.) fideleri ve rizosferin biyolojik özelliklerine topraklara farklı dozlarda uygulanan vermikompostun etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Topraklara vermikompostun beş farklı dozu (kontrol (0), %2.5, %5, %7.5 ve %10) uygulanmış, deneme saksılarda yürütülmüştür. Hasat sonunda arpa bitkilerinin biyomas ve kök uzunluğu, biyomas ve kök ağırlıkları, yaprak su içeriği, klorofil miktarı ile rizosfer toprağının bazı biyolojik özellikleri incelenmiştir. Arpa fide boyu, kök uzunluğu, yaprak su içeriği, biyomas yaş ve kuru ağırlığı üzerine %10 vermikompost dozu etkili bulunurken, klorofil miktarı, kök yaş ve kuru ağırlığı üzerine %7.5 uygulama dozu etkili olmuştur. Uygulama dozları, kontrolle karşılaştırıldığında yaprakların Fe, Mg, K ve P içeriklerini artırmıştır. En yüksek Mn ve Zn içeriği ise %7.5 doz ile alınmıştır. Vermikompostun %7.5’lik dozu rizosferin CO2 miktarını artırmış, %10’luk uygulama ise enzim aktiviteleri üzerinde etkili olmuştur. Sera koşullarında saksı denemeleri ile yapılan sonuçlarımızı doğrulamak, vermikompostun bitki ve toprak sağlığı açısından biyogübre olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermek için tarla denemelerine de ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ödemiş, M., Küçük, Ç. (2025). The Effect of Different Application Doses of Commercial Vermicompost on Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Seedling Development and Rhizosphere Biological Properties. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.18586/msufbd.1748985

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Alvarez J.M., Pasian C., Lal R., Lopez R., Fernandez M.Vermicompost and biochar substrates can reduce nutrients leachates on containerized ornamental plant production. Horticultura Brasileira, 37 (1):47–53, 2019.
  2. Yatoo A.M., Rasool S., Ali S., Majid S., Rehman M.U., Ali M., Eachkoti R., Rasool S., Rashid S.M., Farooq S. Vermicomposting: An eco-friendly approach for recycling/management of organic wastes. In Bioremediation and Biotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, pp. 167–187, 2020.
  3. Rekha G.S., Kaleena P.K., Elumalai D. Skikumaran P.M., Maheswari V.N. Effects of vermicompost and plant growth enhancers on the exo-morphological features of Capsicum annum (Linn.) Hepper. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult., 7: 83–88, 2018.
  4. Datta S., Singh J., Singh S., Singh J. 2016. Earthworms, pesticides and sustainable agriculture: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23:8227–8243, 2016.
  5. Bidabadi S.S. Waste management using vermicompost derived liquids in sustainable horticulture. Trends Hortic., 1, 175, 2018.
  6. Liao Z, Fan J, Lai Z, Bai Z, Wang H, Cheng M, Zhang F, Li Z. Chapter three– response network and regulatory measures of plant-soil-rhizosphere environment to drought stress, editor(s): Donald L. Sparks, advances in Agronomy. Acad Press 180:93–196,2023.
  7. Steffen G.P.K., Maldaner J., de Morais R.M., Saldanha C.W., Missio E.L., Steffen R.B., Osorio Filho B.D. The vermicompost anticipates flowering and increases tomato productivity. Agrocienc. Urug., 23:e54, 2019.
  8. Arancon N.Q., Owens J.D., Converse C. The effects of vermicompost tea on the growth and yield of lettuce and tomato in a non-circulating hydroponics system. J. Plant Nutr. 42:2447–2458, 2019.
  9. Ravindran B., Wong J.W., Selvam A., Sekaran G. Influence of microbial diversity and plant growth hormones in compost and vermicompost from fermented tannery waste. Bioresour. Technol., 217:200–204, 2016.
  10. Atiyeh R.M., Subler S., Edwards C.A., Bachman G., Metzger J.D., Shuster W. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia, 44:579–590, 2000.
  11. Lv M., Li J., Zhang W., Zhou B., Dai J., Zhang C. Microbial activity was greater in soils added with herb residue vermicompost than chemical fertilizer Soil Ecol. Lett., 2:209-219, 2020.
  12. Yang H., Li Z., Deng M., Sheng Z., Zhang Y., Hu F., Wu X., Xu Z. Effects of the combined application of different fertilizers and urea on nitrogen transformation enzyme activities in tea-garden soil from Chongqing. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol., 26:1107–1114, 2020.
  13. Mukherjee A., Gaurav A.K., Patel A.K., Singh S., Chouhan G.K., Lepcha A.Unlocking the potential plant growth-promoting properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum l.) seed endophytes bio-inoculants for improving soil health and crop production. Land Degradation & Development, 32:4362–4374, 2021.
  14. Guo L, Qiao J, Zhou D, Qin D, Huo J.Effect of vermicompost on fruit quality, growth, and rhizosphere soil enzyme activities of blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L). J Soil Sci Plant Nutr., 23:3797–3805, 2023.
  15. Albiach R., Canet R., Pomares F., Ingelmo F. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresource Technology, 75:43-48, 2000.
  16. Arancon N.Q., Edwards, C.A., Bierman, P. Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries: part 2. effects on soil microbiological and chemical properties. Bioresour. Technol., 97:831-840, 2006
  17. Saini I., Aggarwal A., Kaushik P. Influence of Biostimulants on Important Traits of Zinnia elegans Jacq. under Open Field Conditions. International Journal of Agronomy, 1:1-8, 2019.
  18. Pramanik P., Ghosh G.K., Ghosal P.K., Banik P. Changes in organic- C, N, P and K and enzyme activities in vermicompost of biodegradable organic wastes under liming and microbial inoculants. Bioresource Technology, 98:2485–2494, 2007.
  19. Partey S.T., Zougmore R.B., Thevathasan N.V., Preziosi R.F. Effects of plant residue decomposition on soil N availability, microbial biomass and β-glucosidase activity during soil fertility ımprovement in Ghana. Pedosphere, 29: 608–618, 2019.
  20. Tao R., Li J., Guan Y., Liang Y., Hu B., Lv J., Chu G. Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on the soil mineral nitrogen dynamics and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions on calcareous soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research İnternational, 25: 9155–9164, 2018.
  21. Sudkolai S.T., Nourbakhsh F. Urease activity as an index forassessing the maturity of cow manure and wheat residue vermicomposts. Waste Manage, 64:63–66, 2017.
  22. Oral E., Kendal E., Doğan Y.Adıyaman ve Şanlıurfa-Hilvan Şartlarında Yazlık Arpa Genotiplerinde Verim ve Bazı Kalite Kriterlerinin Araştırılması. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 31(2): 23-36, 2017.
  23. Eğilmez S. Ürün raporu Arpa 2024. Tarimsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü TEPGE. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge, 2024.
  24. Oyege I, Balaji Bhaskar MS. Effects of Vermicompost on Soil and Plant Health and Promoting Sustainable Agriculture. Soil Systems, 7(4):101, 2023.
  25. Doğan S., Demirel K., Çamoğlu G., Nar H., Akçal A. Farklı sulama seviyelerinin ceylan gözünün bitkisel özellikleri üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. ÇOMÜ Lapseki Meslek Yüksekokulu Uygulamalı Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1:1-15, 2020.
  26. Smart R.E., Bingham G.E. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant physiology, 53:258- 260, 1974.
  27. Rathore S., Kumar, R. Agronomic interventions affect the growth, yield, and essential oil composition of German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla l.) in the western himalaya. Industrial Crops and Products, 171:113873, 2021.
  28. Jones Jr J.B., Case V.W. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples, pp.389427. In: R.L. Westerman (Ed.), Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. SSSA BookSeries 3. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI., 1990.
  29. Anderson J.P.E. Soil respiration. In: methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties (Ed. A.L. Page). ASA-SSSA, Madison, Winsconsin. pp. 831-871, 1982.
  30. Pepper I.L., Gerba C.P., Brendecke J.W. Environmental microbiology: a laboratory manual. Academic Press Inc. New York, USA, 1995.
  31. Tabatabai M.A., Bremner J.M. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1: 301-307, 1969.
  32. Küçük Ç., Şinşek N. The effects of different agricultural wastes on some microbiologial properties of soil. International on Mathematic, Engineering and Natural Sciences, 15:451-460, 2020.
  33. Zu Y., Zhang J., Zhao R., Dai H., Zhang Z. Application of vermicompost improves strawberry growth and quality through increased photosynthesis rate, free radical scavenging and soil enzymatic activity. Scientia Horticulturae, 233: 132-140, 2018.
  34. Atiyeh R.M., Arancon N.Q., Edwards C.A., Metzger J.D. The influence of humic acid derived from earthworms processed organicwastes on the plant growth. Bioresour Technol., 84(1):7–14, 2002.
  35. Teke Ş, Coşkan A, Aktaş H. The Effects of Vermicompost on Yield and Quality Parameters in Tomato. Turkish Journal of Science and Engineering, 1(1): 23-27, 2019
  36. Zuo Y., Zhang J., Zhao R., Dai H., Zhang Z. Application of vermicompost improves strawberry growth and quality through increased photosynthesis rate, free radical scavenging and soil enzymatic activity. Scientia Horticulturae, 233: 132–140, 2018.
  37. Zeighami Nejad, K., Ghasemi, M., Shamili M., Damizadeh G.R. Effect of mycorrhiza and vermicompost on drought tolerance of lime seedlings (Citrus aurantifolia cv. Mexican Lime). International Journal of Fruit Science, 20 (3):646–57, 2020.
  38. Wang, F., Wang X., Song N. Biochar and vermicompost improve the soil properties and the yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in plastic shed soil continuously cropped for different years. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 315:107425, 2021.
  39. Kyzy A.M., Yıldırım G.H., Yılmaz N. Effects of vermicompost applications on chlorophyll content and flag leaf area in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9:1-21, 2023.
  40. Hassan S.A.M., Taha R.A., Zaied N.S.M., Essa E.M., El-Rheem A.K.M. Effect of vermicompost on vegetative growth and nutrient status of acclimatized Grand Naine banana plants. Heliyon. 8: e10914, 2022.
  41. Amadou A., Song A., Tang Z.X., Li Y., Wang E.Z., Lu Y.Q., Liu X.D., Yi K., Zhang B., Fan F. The Effects of Organic and Mineral Fertilization on Soil Enzyme Activities and Bacterial Community in the Below- and Above-Ground Parts of Wheat. Agronomy, 10:1452, 2020.
  42. Dignac M.F., Derrien D., Barre P. Increasing soil carbon storage: mechanisms, effects of agricultural practices and proxies. A review. Agron Sust Dev., 37:14, 2017.
  43. Bandick A.K., Dick R.P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol. Biochem., 31: 1471-1479, 1999.
  44. Li S.Q., Ling L., Li S.X. Review on the factors affecting soil microbial biomass nitrogen. Soil Environ., 9 (2):158-162, 2000.
  45. Raza S.T., Wu J., Rene E.R., Ali Z., Chen Z. Reuse of agricultural wastes, manure, and biochar as an organic amendment: a review on its implications for vermicomposting technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 360:13220, 2022.
  46. Steffen G.P.K., Maldaner J., de Morais R.M., Saldanha C.W., Missio E.L., Steffen R.B., Osorio Filho B.D. The vermicompost anticipates flowering and increases tomato productivity. Agrocienc. Urug., 23:e54, 2019.