Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Investigation of the Trachea in Porcupines with Computerized Tomography

Oklu Kirpilerde Trachea’nın Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile İncelenmesi

Pages
1–6
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was thought that this study will provide reference datas for similar studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In literature reviews on porcupines, no research has been found on the examination of the trachea’s computerized tomography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to examine the computerized tomography for the first time in porcupines and to provide significant contributions in this field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was thought that this study will provide reference datas for similar studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Oklu kirpi · Bilgisayarlı tomografi · Trachea

Abstract

In literature reviews on porcupines, no research has been found on the examination of the trachea’s computerized tomography. In this study, it was aimed to examine the computerized tomography for the first time in porcupines and to provide significant contributions in this field. A total of 10 adult porcupines were used in the study. The multidetector computerized tomography views and the measurements were taken from the 4 specified points of the pars cervicalis and pars thoracalis of the trachea. A meaningful statistical distinction between the males and females was not found. In all the materials, the vertical diameter was measured higher than the transversal diameter. Also in all of the subjects; the increase in the diameters of the trachea from the cranial towards the caudal was found to be remarkable. In the statistical investigation; in the measurements of the vertical (V) and transversal (T) diameters and in the measurements of the lumen crosssectional area (CSA), the differences between the cervical and thoracal measurement values were found to be significant. It was thought that this study will provide reference datas for similar studies.

Özet

Oklu kirpiler üzerinde yapılan literatür taramalarında trachea’nın bilgisayarlı tomografi metodu ile incelendiği bir araştırmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu çalışmada; oklu kirpilerde trachea’nın bilgisayarlı tomografi ile ilk kez incelenmesi ve alanına önemli katkılar sağlaması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada 10 erişkin oklu kirpi kullanılmıştır. Multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri ve ölçümleri trachea ’nın pars cervicalis’i ve pars thoracalis’inden belirlenen 4 noktadan alınmıştır. Erkek ve dişiler arasında anlamlı bir istatistiksel ayrım tespit edilmemiştir. Bütün materyallerde vertical çap, transversal çaptan daha yüksek olarak ölçülmüştür. Ayrıca deneklerin tamamında; trachea’nın çaplarının cranial’den caudale gidildikçe artması dikkat çekici bulunmuştur. İstatistiksel incelemede; vertical (V) ve transversal (T) çaplar ile lümen kesit alanı (crossection area) (CSA) ölçümlerinde, cervical ve thoracal değerler arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmanın benzer araştırmalara referans veriler sunacağına kanaat getirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAR, Ö., KOÇ, M., ÖZKAN, Z. E., KANMAZ, Y. A., BAYGELDİ, S. B., ALKLAY, A. A. (2018). The Investigation of the Trachea in Porcupines with Computerized Tomography. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/152527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Atalar Ö, Koç M, İlgün R, Yılmaz B. (2017). Oklu Kirpilerde Böbreklerin Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle İncelen-mesi. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 6: 138-141
  2. Dallman MJ, Brown EM. (1984). Statistical Analysis Of Selected Tracheal Measurements in Normal Dogs And Dogs With Collapsed Trachea. Am J Vet Res. 45: 1033-1037
  3. Burk RL, Ackerman N. (1996). Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasonograph. A Diagnostic Atlas and Text. Phila-delphia, Saunders. 98
  4. Carlisle CH, Bilry DN, Thrall DE. (1991). Tracheal and Laryngeal Tumors in The Dog and Cat, Literature Review and 13 Additional Patients. Vet Radiology. 32: 229-235
  5. Brovida C, Castagnaro M. (1992). Tracheal Obstruction Due to an Eosinophilic Granuloma in A Dog, Surgical Treatment and Clinicopathological Observations. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 28: 8-12
  6. Röcken H, Röcken M. (1994). Foreign Body in the Bifurcation Trachea in a Dog. Berl Münch Tierarztl Wschr. 107:121-123
  7. Kara ME, Karaman ZC, Dabanoglu I, Ocal MK. (2001). Computed Tomogaphic Measurements of the Trachea in Dog. Dtsch Tierarztl Wschr. 108: 164-167
  8. Atalar Ö, Koç M, Yüksel M, Arkaş Alklay A. (2017). Kangal Köpeklerinde Pelvis Boşluğunun Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Üç Boyutlu Değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Üniver-sitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 31: 105-109
  9. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. (2012). Prepared by the International Committes on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature and Authorized by the General Assambly of the World Association of Veterinary Anatomists, The Editorial Committee Hannover, Sapporo, Japan
  10. Van Pelt RW. (1998). Confirming Tracheal Hypoplasia in Huskymix Pups. Vet Med. 83: 266-273
  11. Salisbury SK, Forbes S, Blevins WE. (1990). Peritrac-heal Abscess Associated With Tracheal Collapse And Bilateral Laryngeal Paralysis in A Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 196:1273-1275
  12. Smith MM, Gourley IM, Amis TC, Kurpershoek C. (1990). Management of Tracheal Stenosis in A Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 196: 931-934
  13. Coyne BE, Fingland RB. (1992). Hypoplasia of The Trachea in Dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 201:768-772
  14. Watt PR. (1992). Congenital Tracheal Collapse in A Young Fox Terrier. Aust Vet Pract. 22: 112-116
  15. Nelson WA. (1993). Lower Respiratory System. ln: Slatter D (Editor) Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia, Saunders. pp: 777-786
  16. White RAS, Williams JM. (1994). Tracheal Collapse in the Dog is There Really a Role For Surgery? J Small Anim Prac. 35: 191-196
  17. Fingland RB, Layton CI, Kennedy GA, Gal