SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Language Teaching and Educational Research / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Exploring the Impact of EFL Learners’ Perceptions of AI usage in Language Learning on Their Perceived Writing Anxiety: A Correlational Study

Arzu Yılmaz(Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University)0000-0001-7015-007X
Eda Üstünel(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2137-1671
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PAS results indicated that learners generally held moderate perceptions of AI in language learning, while concerns about the production of inappropriate language content by AI tools were also noted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As in many fields, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is increasing exponentially.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Informed by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which provides a framework for understanding users’ perceptions in the adoption of new technologies, this study investigated the perceptions of 135 students at a Turkish state university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PAS results indicated that learners generally held moderate perceptions of AI in language learning, while concerns about the production of inappropriate language content by AI tools were also noted.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Technology Acceptance Model · AI use in Language Teaching · Writing Anxiety

Abstract

As in many fields, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is increasing exponentially. In English Language Teaching and Learning, in particular, there is an accumulating body of research exploring this phenomenon. Given the potential benefits of AI, understanding language learners’ perspectives on its use in language education has become crucial. Informed by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which provides a framework for understanding users’ perceptions in the adoption of new technologies, this study investigated the perceptions of 135 students at a Turkish state university. Additionally, it explored the learners’ levels of foreign language writing anxiety and examined the relationship between their perceptions of AI use and their writing anxiety. The study adopted a correlational research design, and data were collected through Perceptions of AI Usage Scale (PAS) developed by Aydın (2024), and the Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (SLWAI) developed by Cheng (2004). PAS results indicated that learners generally held moderate perceptions of AI in language learning, while concerns about the production of inappropriate language content by AI tools were also noted. SLWAI results revealed that learners experienced moderate levels of writing anxiety across its three subscales. Additionally, the study found a weak positive relationship between learners’ perceptions of AI use and their writing anxiety, suggesting no significant correlation. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature by offering insights into learners’ perceptions of AI use in language education and highlighting the complex interplay between AI use and foreign language writing anxiety.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, A., Üstünel, E. (2025). Exploring the Impact of EFL Learners’ Perceptions of AI usage in Language Learning on Their Perceived Writing Anxiety: A Correlational Study. Language Teaching and Educational Research, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1686314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (79)

  1. Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., Yan, D., & Younas, M. (2024). Mapping artificial intelligence integration in education: A decade of innovation and impact (2013–2023)—A bibliometric analysis. IEEE Access, 12, 113275–113299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443313
  2. Ahmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
  3. Almelhes, S. A. (2023). A review of artificial intelligence adoption in second-language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(5), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1305.21
  4. Al-Sofi, B. B. M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence-powered tools and academic writing: To use or not to use ChatGPT. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 4(3), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-06-2024-0029
  5. Alqaed, M. A. (2024). AI in English language learning: Saudi learners’ perspectives and usage. Advanced Education, 12(25), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.318972
  6. Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Prospective teachers and L2 writing anxiety. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 100-118.
  7. Ateş, S. (2013). Foreign language writing anxiety of prospective EFL teachers: How to reduce their anxiety levels(Unpublished master’s thesis). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=370433
  8. Aydın, S. (2024). Construction and validation of the Perceptions of AI Usage Scale in a foreign language learning context [Unpublished manuscript].
  9. Aydin, S., & Zeinolabedini, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence into foreign language learning: Learners' perspectives [ERIC Document No. ED662814]. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED662814.pdf
  10. Aziza, E. (2025). Learner perceptions and attitudes towards AI in English language learning. Prospects of Teaching English for Professional Purposes in Non–Philological Higher Education Institutions: Problems and Solutions, 703–709. https://wosjournals.com/index.php/pteconf/article/view/1872
  11. Badrasawi, K. J., Zubairi, A., & Idrus, F. (2016). Exploring the relationship between writing apprehension and writing performance: A qualitative study. International Education Studies, 9(8), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n8p134
  12. Bailin, A. (1988). Artificial intelligence and computer-assisted language instruction: A perspective. CALICO Journal, 5(3), 25–45.
  13. Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019, February). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
  14. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
  15. Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427
  16. Benek, K. (2025). EFL learners' and teachers' perceptions of AI-powered language learning technologies: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1827a
  17. Cantina, J. M. (2016). Linking anxiety in second language with students' writing performance. Journal of Higher Education Research Disciplines, 1(1), 21–32. https://www.nmsc.edu.ph/ojs/index.php/jherd/article/view/55
  18. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  19. Chen, H. H. J., Yang, C. T. Y., & Lai, K. K. W. (2023). Investigating college EFL learners’ perceptions toward the use of Google Assistant for foreign language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1833043
  20. Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00095
  21. Cheng, Y. S. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01903.x
  22. Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
  23. Choi, S. (2013). Language anxiety in second language writing: Is it really a stumbling block? (Master’s thesis). University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/49202f93-1ac4-4a65-bbcd-36bb5bae04f5
  24. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. H., Tu, Y. F., & Yang, K. H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
  25. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  26. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  27. Çağlar Kabınkara, D. N. (2023). Relationship between EFL students' writing anxiety and their achievement in EFL context (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi. [Tez No: 825164]
  28. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  29. De la Vall, R. R. F., & Araya, F. G. (2023). Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-language learning tools. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 10(01), 7569–7576. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02
  30. Dogan, M. E., Goru Dogan, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053056
  31. Ekmekçi, E. (2018). Exploring Turkish EFL students’ writing anxiety. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1), 158–175. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324825129_
  32. Erdel, D. (2024). A thorough investigation into foreign language writing anxiety in a Turkish EFL context. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1373734
  33. Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, A. İ. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly March 2011 Volume 13, Issue, 13(1), 164-192.
  34. Genç, E., & Yaylı, D. (2019). The second language writing anxiety: The perceived sources and consequences. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (PAU Journal of Education), 45, 235–251. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE.2018.231
  35. Glaser, N. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as an educational technology: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09684-4
  36. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24. http://doi.org/10125/73474
  37. Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162981
  38. Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
  39. Hawanti, S., & Zubaydulloevna, K. M. (2023). AI chatbot-based learning: Alleviating students' anxiety in English writing classroom. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 7(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i2.659
  40. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009
  41. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
  42. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
  43. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F.,. & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  44. Keyvanoğlu, F. B., & Atmaca, Ç. (2023). An investigation into preparatory class EFL students’ L2 writing anxiety. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 13(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1135409
  45. Kim, N. Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.037
  46. Kırmızı, Ö., & Kırmızı, G. D. (2015). An investigation of L2 learners' writing self-efficacy, writing anxiety and its causes at higher education in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p57
  47. Korkmaz, H., & Akbıyık, M. (2024). Unlocking the potential: Attitudes of tertiary level EFL learners towards using AI in language learning. Participatory Educational Research, 11(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.76.11.6
  48. Kushmar, L. V., Vornachev, A. O., Korobova, I. O., & Kaida, N. O. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: What are we afraid of? Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL (8), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.18
  49. Lee, Y.-J., Davis, R. O., & Lee, S. O. (2024). University students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-based tools for English writing courses. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(1), e202412. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14195
  50. Liu, Z. (2024). Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2024-0260
  51. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/tr//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf
  52. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  53. Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001
  54. Ozer, O. (2024). AI language models: A breach of academic integrity in online language learning? Studies in Language Assessment, 13(1), 237–262. https://www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/7._sila_13_1__ozer.pdf
  55. Öztürk, G., & Saydam, D. (2014). Anxiety and self-efficacy in foreign language writing: The case in Turkey. Başkent University Journal of Education, 10–21. http://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/view/32
  56. Persulessy, S. I., Nikijuluw, R. P. V., & Jakob, J. C. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence in language learning: What about engineering students’ perception? Journal of English Education Program (JEEP), 5(1), Article 71159. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v5i1.71159
  57. Phan, T. N. L. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the AI technology application in English writing classes. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2344
  58. Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 6895-6908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8
  59. Rezaei, M., & Jafari, M. (2014). Investigating the levels, types, and causes of writing anxiety among Iranian EFL students: A mixed method design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1545-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.577
  60. Roni, S. M., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer.
  61. Rusmiyanto, R., Huriati, N., Fitriani, N., Tyas, N. K., Rofi’i, A., & Sari, M. N. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing English language learners’ communication skills. Journal on Education, 6(1), 750-757. https://nasim.hormozgan.ac.ir/ostad/UploadedFiles/395003/395003-8414788631563835.pdf
  62. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  63. Shen, X., & Tao, Y. (2025). Metacognitive strategies, AI-based writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in AI-assisted writing contexts: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Teaching and Society, 7(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20250105
  64. Son, J. B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015
  65. Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing artificial intelligence-based paraphrasing tool in EFL writing class: A focus on Indonesian university students’ perceptions. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882
  66. Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. In Proceedings of the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021) (pp. 52–57). Atlantis Press. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 624. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
  67. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  68. Tavakoli, H. (2012). A dictionary of research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. Rahnama press.
  69. Uppal, K., & Hajian, S. (2025). Students' perceptions of ChatGPT in higher education: A study of academic enhancement, procrastination, and ethical concerns. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.199
  70. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  71. Yatri, D., Anugerahwati, M., & Setyowati, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in language learning (English and Arabic class): Students’ and teachers’ experience and perceptions. Transformational Language, Literature, and Technology Overview in Learning (TRANSTOOL), 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55047/transtool.v3i1.1338
  72. Yetkin, R., & Özer-Altınkaya, Z. (2024). AI in the language classroom: Insights from pre-service English teachers. E-Learning and Digital Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241267011
  73. Yu, Z. (2024). The study of the correlation between AI-assisted EFL writing frequency and writing anxiety among Chinese university students. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 7(7), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2024.070702
  74. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  75. Zhang, H. (2011). A study on ESL writing anxiety among Chinese English majors: Causes, effects and coping strategies for ESL writing anxiety [Master’s thesis, Kristianstad University]. DiVA. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-8247
  76. Zhang, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement and L2 motivational self-system. In Proceedings of the International CALL Research Conference (pp. 321–326). Castledown Publishers. https://doi.org/10.29140/9780648184485-48
  77. Zhao, X. (2023). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing Wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 890–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089
  78. Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x
  79. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F.,. & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274