SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Language Teaching and Educational Research / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Middle School Students’ Experiences of Learning English Vocabulary Through Visual Materials: A Phenomenological Study

Ozan Öztürk(TC MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI VAN)0009-0002-0056-4669
Ayşe Elitok Kesici(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0002-9776-6680
Barış Çavuş(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9922-2994
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings offer teachers and material developers an experiential perspective of why visual support matters to learners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to describe middle school students’ experiences of learning English vocabulary through visual materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adopting a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, the study was conducted with twenty 8th-grade students at a public middle school in a rural district of Türkiye, all of whom had been taught four coursebook units with visually supported instruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings offer teachers and material developers an experiential perspective of why visual support matters to learners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:phenomenology · middle school students · visual materials

Abstract

This study aims to describe middle school students’ experiences of learning English vocabulary through visual materials. Adopting a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, the study was conducted with twenty 8th-grade students at a public middle school in a rural district of Türkiye, all of whom had been taught four coursebook units with visually supported instruction. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers and analyzed following Moustakas’s (1994) phenomenological steps. The analysis yielded six themes under two research questions: students described their experiences through remembering through images, learning without rote memorization, and inferring meaning from visuals, and they attached to visually supported instruction the meanings of comprehending meaning, enjoyment and motivation, and imagined ideal ways of learning. The essence of the experience lay in a shift from memorization to recognition: words learned through images were experienced as scenes to be reseen rather than items to be retrieved. The findings offer teachers and material developers an experiential perspective of why visual support matters to learners.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, O., Kesici, A. E., Çavuş, B. (2026). Middle School Students’ Experiences of Learning English Vocabulary Through Visual Materials: A Phenomenological Study. Language Teaching and Educational Research, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.35207/later.2006524

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Betaubun, M., Rokhmah, D. E. L., & Budiasto, J. (2023). Personalized pathways to proficiency: Exploring the synergy of adaptive learning and artificial intelligence in English language learning. *Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 17*(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v17i.10047
  2. Birinci, F. G., & Sarıçoban, A. (2021). The effectiveness of visual materials in teaching vocabulary to deaf students of EFL. *Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17*(1), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.43
  3. Chung, D. T. K. (2023). The efficacy of visual aids in enhancing vocabulary acquisition in EFL classes. *International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6*(10), 6397–6403. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-80
  4. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: "Student voice" in educational research and reform. *Curriculum Inquiry, 36*(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). *Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches* (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  6. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). *Handbook of qualitative research*. Sage Publications.
  7. Devi Krishnan, P., & Md Yunus, M. (2019). Blended CEFR in enhancing vocabulary among low proficiency students. *Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL*(5), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.11
  8. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). *Teaching and researching motivation* (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  9. Folse, K. S. (2004). *Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching*. University of Michigan Press.
  10. Golaghaei, N., & Kakolian, S. (2015). The effect of visual and etymological treatments on learning decomposable idioms among EFL learners. *International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4*(5), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.72
  11. Harmer, J. (2001). *The practice of English language teaching* (3rd ed.). Longman.
  12. Hashemi, M., & Pourgharib, B. (2013). The effect of visual instruction on new vocabularies learning. *International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2*(6), 623–627.
  13. Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (Eds.). (2003). *Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches*. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0
  14. Karami, A. (2019). Implementing audio-visual materials (videos), as an incidental vocabulary learning strategy, in second/foreign language learners' vocabulary development: A current review of the most recent research. *i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 9*(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.9.2.15519
  15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). *Naturalistic inquiry*. Sage Publications.
  16. Mansourzadeh, N. (2014). A comparative study of teaching vocabulary through pictures and audio-visual aids to young Iranian EFL learners. *Journal of Elementary Education, 24*(1), 47–59.
  17. Mashhadi, F., & Jamalifar, G. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through visual and textual representation. *Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192*, 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.044
  18. Mayer, R. E. (2009). *Multimedia learning* (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  19. Merriam, S. B. (2015). *Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber* (S. Turan, trans. ed.). Nobel Publishing.
  20. Moustakas, C. (1994). *Phenomenological research methods*. Sage Publications.
  21. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). *Learning vocabulary in another language*. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Nazira, A., Suciani, P. R., Dewi, N. L. P. M., & Wulandari, E. (2025). EFL learners’ perceptions on the use of flashcards in English vocabulary learning: A lesson from remote schools. *Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5*(2), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2677
  23. Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, H. T. T. (2024). The effectiveness of using visual aids in teaching English vocabulary to Vietnamese young learners: An experimental study. *English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal, 7*(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v7i3.2483
  24. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. *International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16*(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  25. Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. *TESL Canada Journal, 7*(2), 9–30.
  26. Paivio, A. (2013). *Imagery and verbal processes*. Psychology Press. (Original work published 1971)
  27. Rokni, S. J. A., & Karimi, N. (2013). Visual instruction: An advantage or a disadvantage? What about its effect on EFL learners' vocabulary learning? *Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2*(4), 236–243.
  28. Sadeghi, K., & Farzizadeh, B. (2013). The effect of visually supported vocabulary instruction on beginning EFL learners' vocabulary gain. *MEXTESOL Journal, 37*(1), 1–12.
  29. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. *Language Teaching Research, 12*(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
  30. Sheridan, R., & Markslag, L. (2017). Effective strategies for teaching vocabulary: An introduction to engaging cooperative vocabulary card activities. *PASAA, 53*, 214–229.
  31. Teedaaksornsakul, M., & Bowen, N. E. J. A. (2024). Students' perceptions of intersemiotically cohesive teaching materials designed for English for agriculture. *rEFLections, 31*(2), 568–591.
  32. van Manen, M. (1990). *Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy*. State University of New York Press.
  33. Yasin, M. M., & Mohamad, M. (2024). The use of visual aids to improve deaf students' English vocabulary: A literature review. *SHS Web of Conferences, 182*, Article 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418202001
  34. Yörük, S., & Verim, G. (2014). Opinions of teachers working in secondary schools on instructional technologies and material designs. *Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 14*(1), 1–8.
  35. Zarei, G. R., & Khazaie, S. (2011). L2 vocabulary learning through multimodal representations. *Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15*, 369–375.