SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DARK TRIAD PERSONALITY PATTERNS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION - ISTANBUL SAMPLE

KARANLIK ÜÇLÜ KİŞİLİK ÖRÜNTÜLERİ VE PSİKOLOJİK MANİPÜLASYON ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN DEĞERLENDİRMESİ-İSTANBUL ÖRNEKLEMİ

Gülçin Şenyuva(HALİÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-9917-1405
Mustafa Fatih Yavuz(İSTANBUL YENİ YÜZYIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8331-8783
Pages
223–231
Publication Date
2024-09-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is directed towards understanding the proportion of people with dark triad personality traits who have manipulative traits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the manipulation skills of individuals with dark triad personality traits in interpersonal relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: The sample group of the study consisted of 1003 individuals residing in Istanbul. "Demographic Information Form", "Dark Triad Personality Scale" and "Manipulation in Interpersonal Relationships Scale" were administered to the participants online.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is directed towards understanding the proportion of people with dark triad personality traits who have manipulative traits.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karanlık üçlü · narsisizm · psikopati

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the manipulation skills of individuals with dark triad personality traits in interpersonal relationships. Materials and Method: The sample group of the study consisted of 1003 individuals residing in Istanbul. "Demographic Information Form", "Dark Triad Personality Scale" and "Manipulation in Interpersonal Relationships Scale" were administered to the participants online. Results: The study included 1003 participants, 720 of whom were female and 283 of whom were male, between the ages of 18-65 living in Istanbul. A significant difference was found between the mean total scores of the Dark Triad Personality Scale according to the gender of the participants (t=-5.143; p=.000). There was a significant difference between the mean scores of the participants on the Manipulation in Human Relations Scale Victim Selection subscale according to their gender (t=-2.824; p=.005). There was a significant positive correlation between the participants' dark triad personality scores and manipulation in human relations (r=.421; p<.01), aggressive manipulation (r=.357; p<.01), emotional manipulation (r=.302; p<.01), victim selection (r=.356; p<.01), self-concealment (r=.393; p<.01) and strategy (r=.455; p<.01) scores at medium effect size. Conclusion: The results of the study showed that manipulative skills can contribute to the development of dark triad personality. This study is directed towards understanding the proportion of people with dark triad personality traits who have manipulative traits.

Özet

ÖZ Amaç: Bu çalışmada; karanlık üçlü kişilik özelliklerine sahip bireylerin kişilerarası ilişkilerde manipülasyon becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereçler ve Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu, İstanbul ilinde ikamet eden 1003 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılara online ortamda öz bildirime dayalı “Demografik Bilgi Formu”, “Karanlık Üçlü Kişilik Ölçeği” ile “İnsan İlişkilerinde Manipülasyon Ölçeği” uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmaya İstanbul ilinde yaşayan 18-65 yaş aralığındaki 720’si kadın, 283’ü erkek olmak üzere 1003 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Katılımcıların cinsiyetlerine göre Karanlık Üçlü Kişilik Ölçeğinden aldıkları toplam puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (t=-5.143; p=.000). Katılımcıların cinsiyetlerine göre İnsan İlişkilerinde Manipülasyon Ölçeği Kurban Seçimi alt ölçeğinden aldıkları ortalama puanlar arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (t=-2.824; p=.005). Katılımcıların karanlık üçlü kişilik puanları ile insan ilişkilerinde manipülasyon (r=.421; p<.01), saldırgan manipülasyon (r=.357; p<.01), duygusal manipülasyon (r=.302; p<.01), kurban seçimi (r=.356; p<.01), kendini gizleme (r=.393; p<.01) ve strateji (r=.455; p<.01) puanları arasında orta etki büyüklüğünde pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara bakıldığında manipülatif becerilerin karanlık üçlü kişilik gelişimine katkı sağlayabileceği bulunmuştur. Bu çalışma manipülatif özelliği bulunan karanlık üçlü kişilik özelliği olan kişilerin oranını anlamaya yönelmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şenyuva, G., Yavuz, M. F. (2024). ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DARK TRIAD PERSONALITY PATTERNS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION - ISTANBUL SAMPLE. Kıbrıs Türk Psikiyatri ve Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.24.3.03

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Arslantaş H, Gültekin B K, Söylemez A ve ark. (2010) Bir üniversite hastanesi psikiyatri polikliniğine ilk kez başvuran hastaların damgalanmayla ilgili inanç, tutum ve davranışları, 11: 11-17.
  2. Bekaroğlu, M. (1995). Çare arama davranışı ve kültür. IV Anadolu Psikiyatri Günleri. Bilimsel Çalışmalar, Konya. Bhugra, D. (1989). Attitudes towards mental illness: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 80:1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb01293.x.
  3. Blair, R. J., Mitchell, D. G., & Blair, K. S. (2008). The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain (5 ed.). London: Blackwell Publishing.
  4. Braiker, H. B. (2004). Who's Pulling Your Strings ? How to Break The Cycle of Manipulation. ISBN 0-07144672-9. s: 49-53.
  5. Buss, D.M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  7. Campbell, W. K., and Miller, J. D. (2011). The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorders: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Findings and Treatments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
  8. Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: NY.
  9. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 11–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.11.
  10. Ertürk, Yaşar - Arıkan, Selma, “Romantik İlişkilerde İlişki İstikrarı: Sınır Kişilik Örgütlenmesinde Erken Dönem Uyumsuz Şemalar, İlişkilerde Manipülasyon ve Flört Şiddeti Bağlamıda İncelenmesi, International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research, 9 (87), September 2022; http://dx.doi. org/10.26450/jshsr.3213.
  11. Dorpat, T. L. (1996). Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation, and Other Methods of Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson, Inc.
  12. Fernie, B. A., Fung, A., Nikčević, A. V. (2016). Different coping strategies amongst individuals with grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic traits. Journal of Affective Disorders, 205, 301–305. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.009.
  13. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3. 429
  14. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. doi:10.1111/spc3.12018.
  15. Grieve, R., Hyde, J., (2018). The dark side of emotion at work: Emotional manipulation in everyday and work place contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 108–113. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.025.
  16. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist— Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
  17. Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 25–54. doi:10.1177/0093854896023001004.
  18. Harpur, T. J., Hare, R. D., Hakstian, A. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 6–17. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.6.
  19. Hervé, H. F., Ling, Y., Hare, R. D. (2000). Criminal psychopathy and its subtypes. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press.
  20. Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J. (2006). Psychopathy and negative emotionality: Analyses of suppressor effects reveal distinct relations with emotional distress, fearfulness, and anger-hostility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 276–287. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.115.2.276.
  21. Hightower, Erin, “An Exploratory Study of Personality Factors Related to Psychological Abuse and Gaslighting”, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), William James College, Florida, 2017.
  22. Hyde, J., Grieve, R., Norris, K., Kemp, N. (2020). The dark side of emotional intelligence: The role of gender and the Dark Triad in emotional manipulation at work. Australian Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12294.
  23. Jakobwitz, S., Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006.
  24. Jonason, P. K., Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The Dark Triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 611–615. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.031.
  25. Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572–576. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009.
  26. Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023.
  27. Jones, D. N., Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different Provocations Trigger Aggression in Narcissists and Psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12–18. doi:10.1177/1948550609347591.
  28. Jonason, P. K., Davis, M. D. (2018). A gender role view of the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 102–105. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.004.
  29. Jonason, P. K., Icho, A., Ireland, K. (2016). Resources, Harshness, and Unpredictability. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 147470491562369. doi:10.1177/1474704915623699.
  30. Jonason, P. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Baldacchino, J. (2017). Before and after: Personality pathology, childhood conditions, and life history outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 38–43. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.027.
  31. Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., Penney, L. M. (2010). Re-Examining Machiavelli: A Three-Dimensional Model of Machiavellianism in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868–1896. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00643.x.
  32. Kircaburun, K., Jonason, P., Griffiths, M. D., Aslanargun, E., Emirtekin, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Billieux, J. (2019). Childhood Emotional Abuse and Cyberbullying Perpetration: The Role of Dark Personality Traits. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, doi:10.1177/0886260519889930.
  33. Kowalski, R.M. (Ed.) (2001). Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  34. Leaf, P. J., Bruce, M. L., Tischler, G. L., & Holzer, C. E. (1987). The relationship between demographic factors and attitudes toward mental health services. Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 275–284. doi:10.1002/15206629(198704)15:2 3.0.co;2-j.
  35. Lighter James E., çev. "Gaslight." Def. 2. OED. Comp. OED. Oxford English Dictionary, 11 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/255554?rskey=KtmELD&result=2#eid adresinden erişildi.
  36. McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., Navarrete, C. D. (2012). A life history approach to understanding the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 601–605. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.003.
  37. McGregor, J., McGregor, T. (2014). The sociopath at the breakfast table: Recognizing and dealing with antisocial and manipulative people. Hunter House, Inc. Alameda, CA.
  38. Nagler, U. K. J., Reiter, K. J., Furtner, M. R., Rauthmann, J. F. (2014). Is there a “dark intelligence”? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 47–52. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.025.
  39. O'Toole, M. E., Smith, S. S., & Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathy and predatory stalking of public figures. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (pp. 215–243). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.003.0010.
  40. Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 228–230.
  41. Paulhus, D. L., Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6.
  42. Ray, J. J., Ray, J. A. B. (1982). Some Apparent Advantages of Subclinical Psychopathy. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), 135–142. doi:10.1080/00224545.1982.9713415.
  43. Repke, M. A., Conway, L. G., Houck, S. C. (2017). The Strategic Manipulation of Linguistic Complexity: A Test of Two Models of Lying. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(1), 74–92. doi:10.1177/0261927x17706943.
  44. Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 102–116. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x.
  45. Silverman, I., Choi, J., and Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261-268.
  46. South, AJ., Barkus, E., Walter, EE., Mendonca, C., Thomas, SJ. (2023). Dark Triad personality traits, second-to-forth digit ratio (2D:4D) and circulating testosterone and cortisol levels, Biol Psychol, 2023 Apr:179:108567. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108567.
  47. Thomas, L. (2018). Gaslight and gaslighting. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(2), 117–118. doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30024-5.
  48. Vonk, J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Ewing, D., Mercer, S., Noser, A. E. (2015). Mindreading in the dark: Dark personality features and theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 50–54. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.025.
  49. Zeigler-Hill, V., Vonk, J. (2015). Dark Personality Features and Emotion Dysregulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(8), 692–704. doi:10.1521/jscp.2015.34.8.692.