Journals / Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 30

An Inquiry on Relation among Discourse, Truth and Power in Michel Foucault

Metin Becermen(Uludag University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Philosophy)0000-0002-7585-265X
Pages
131–143
Publication Date
2018-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, Foucault, who thinks that, when the power is at stake, one should go out of the existing game and leave the state our of the game, makes a critical room for philosophy at this point.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Foucault calls his work “a critical history of the thought.” However, the critical history of the thought is the time, when any truth games appear, but not the time, when the truth is obtained or hindered.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This history is directly linked to the power and to how the power operates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, Foucault, who thinks that, when the power is at stake, one should go out of the existing game and leave the state our of the game, makes a critical room for philosophy at this point.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Discourse · Knowledge · Panopticon

Özet

Foucault calls his work “a critical history of the thought.” However, the critical history of the thought is the time, when any truth games appear, but not the time, when the truth is obtained or hindered. This history is directly linked to the power and to how the power operates. Foucault, who also deals with the power matter in line with the relation between discourse, truth and power, inquires function of the power in any enclosed institutions formed depending on development conditions of the capitalism such as hospitals, jails, etc. His main problem is to deal with the power by acting with any power relationship and to make a power solution accordingly. In this context, Foucault also adopts the states as a matter depending on analysis of modern institutions. He thinks that there is a resistance opportunity in wherever the power is available. Resistance means in some ways setting forth a different discourse and developing a game other than the power game. Therefore, Foucault, who thinks that, when the power is at stake, one should go out of the existing game and leave the state our of the game, makes a critical room for philosophy at this point.

🔖

Cite This Article

Becermen, M. (2018). An Inquiry on Relation among Discourse, Truth and Power in Michel Foucault. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, Sayı: 30, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.411673

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Bernauer, J. W. (2005). Foucault’nun Ozgurluk Seruveni, Trans. Ismail Turkmen, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  2. Blanchot M. (2005). “Hayalimdeki Michel Foucault”, Trans. Ayse Meral, Dısarının Dusuncesi Michel Foucault-Hayalimdeki Michel Foucault Maurice Blanchot, Istanbul: Kabalci Yayinevi, ss. 59-104.
  3. Foucault, M. (1992). Hapishanenin Doguşu, Trans. Mehmet Ali Kılıcbay, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayinlari.
  4. Foucault, M. (1993a). Cinselligin Tarihi I, Trans. Hulya Tufan, Istanbul: Afa Yayinlari.
  5. Foucault M. (1993b). Ders Ozetleri, Trans. Selahattin Hilav, İstanbul: YKY.
  6. Foucault M. (2003). Iktidarın Gozu Secme Eserler 4, Trans. Isık Erguden, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  7. Foucault M. (2004). Marx’tan Sonra, Trans. Gokhan Aksay, Civiyazilari Istanbul: Yayinevi.
  8. Foucault M. (2005a). Entelektuelin Siyasi Islevi Secme Eserler 1, Trans. Isık Erguden-Osman Akinhay-Ferda Keskin, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  9. Foucault M. (2005b). Büyük Kapatilma Secme Eserler 3, Trans. Isık Ergüden-Ferda Keskin, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  10. Foucault M. (2005c). Ozne ve Iktidar Secme Eserler 2, Trans. Isık Ergüden-Osman Akinhay, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  11. Hacking I. (1986). “The Archaelogy of Foucault”, Foucault: A Critical Reader, Edit.: David Couzens Hoy, Basil Blackwell, New York, 27-40.
  12. Jenkins K. (1997). Tarihi Yeniden Dusunmek, Trans. Bahadir Sina Sener, Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayinlari.
  13. Keskin F. (1996). “Foucault’da Siddet ve Iktidar”, Cogito, Sayı 6-7, Istanbul: YKY, ss. 117-122.
  14. Megill A. (1998). Asırılıgın Peygamberleri, Trans. Tuncay Birkan, Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayinlari.
  15. Newman S. (2006). Bakuninden Lacan’a Anti-Otorieteryanizm ve Iktidarın Altust Olusu, Trans. Kursad Kızıltug, Istanbul: Ayrinti Yayinlari.
  16. Rouse J. (1994). “Power/Knowledge”, The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, Edit. Gary Gutting, Cambridge University Press, New York, 92-114,
  17. Sarup M. (1995). Postyapisalcilik ve Postmodernizm, Trans. A. Baki Guclu, Ankara: Ark Yayinevi.
  18. Taylor C. (1986). “Foucault on Freedom and Truth”, Foucault: A Critical Reader, Edited by David Couzens Hoy, Basil Blackwell, New York, 69-102.
  19. Walzer M. (1986). “The Politics of Michel Foucault”, Foucault: A Critical Reader, Edit.: David Couzens Hoy, New York: Basil Blackwell, ss. 51-68.
  20. Young R. (2000). Beyaz Mitolojiler, Trans. Can Yildiz, Istanbul: Baglam Yayinlari.