SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

An Analysis of Teacher Well-Being amid Recruitment Reforms in Türkiye: A Case of Pre-Service English Teachers

Seyit Ahmet Çapan(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4302-6812
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Defined as an emotional state of overall harmony among multifaceted factors influencing teachers’ performance, teacher well-being contributes to the quality of instructional practices in the classroom.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effective teaching is an important aspect of educational planning and policy-making.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Defined as an emotional state of overall harmony among multifaceted factors influencing teachers’ performance, teacher well-being contributes to the quality of instructional practices in the classroom.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While initial enthusiasm about teaching and confidence in pre-service education were the major sources of well-being, several factors including financial issues, respect, school environment, ambiguity about recruitment, students’ attitudes, and workload negatively affected perceptions of teacher well-being
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:well-being · emotional · unnoticed

Abstract

Effective teaching is an important aspect of educational planning and policy-making. As the agents of content delivery, teachers play a sound role in realizing curricular goals and objectives. However, maintenance of teachers’ well-being per se is an often-unnoticed component of effective teaching. Defined as an emotional state of overall harmony among multifaceted factors influencing teachers’ performance, teacher well-being contributes to the quality of instructional practices in the classroom. Given the recent developments in terms of teacher recruitment policies of the Turkish government, well-being of teacher candidates is likely to suffer from ambiguities about the test and conditions for selection, requirements of the induction period, and procedures following their selection. To shed light on possible impact(s) of these developments on teachers’ well-being, the present study investigated pre-service English language teachers’ perceptions of well-being amid the revolutionary changes in teacher recruitment in Türkiye. Based on both qualitative and quantitative data, this convergent mixed-methods study used descriptive statistics and content analysis. The study intriguingly found moderate levels of well-being among pre-service teachers. While initial enthusiasm about teaching and confidence in pre-service education were the major sources of well-being, several factors including financial issues, respect, school environment, ambiguity about recruitment, students’ attitudes, and workload negatively affected perceptions of teacher well-being

🔖

Cite This Article

Çapan, S. A. (2026). An Analysis of Teacher Well-Being amid Recruitment Reforms in Türkiye: A Case of Pre-Service English Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1514037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Acton, R., & Glasgow, P. (2015). Teacher wellbeing in neoliberal contexts: A review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(40).
  2. Arda, Ç. (2023). Part-time English language instructors’ well-being: A case study in Türkiye. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
  3. Babic, S., Mercer, S., Mairitsch, A., Gruber, J., & Hempkin, K. (2022). Language teacher wellbeing in the workplace: Balancing needs. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 8(1), 11-34.
  4. Bajorek, Z., Gulliford, J., & Taskila, T. (2014). Healthy teachers, higher marks? Establishing a link between teacher health and well-being, and student outcomes. Lancaster Work Foundation.
  5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
  6. Chen, J., Cheng, H., Zhao, D., Zhou, F., & Chen, Y. (2022). A quantitative study on the impact of working environment on the well-being of teachers in China‘s private colleges. Scientific Reports, 12(3417), 1-9.
  7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  9. Day, C. (2008). Committed for life? Variations in teachers‘ work, lives and effectiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 243–260.
  10. Diener, E. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1-31.
  11. Doecke, B., Kostogriz, A., & Illesca, B. (2010). Seeing "things" differently: Recognition, ethics, praxis. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 9(2), 81-98.
  12. Fox, H. B. (2021). A mixed methods item response theory investigation of teacher well-being. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 82(8-A).
  13. Ghazee, B. (2021). Teacher eligibility test: Approaches and attitude of trainee teachers. International Education and Research Journal, 7(3), 42-43.
  14. Heap, V., & Waters, J. (2019). Mixed Methods in Criminology. Routledge.
  15. Hobson, A. J., & Maxwell, B. (2017). Supporting and inhibiting the well-being of early career secondary school teachers: Extending self-determination theory. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 168–191.
  16. Imazeki, J. (2005). Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 431–449.
  17. Kansu, G. (2018). Teacher wellbeing as the predictor of teacher-student interpersonal relationships in EFL classrooms. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Bilkent University.
  18. Kariková, S. (2010). Reflections on the teaching profession over the last thirty five years. The New Educational Review, 3(4), 189 – 203.
  19. McCallum, F. (2020). The changing nature of teachers‘ work and its impact on wellbeing. In M. A. White & F. McCallum (Eds.), Critical perspectives on teaching, learning and leadership: Enhancing educational outcomes (pp. 17–44). Springer.
  20. McCallum, F., & Price, D. (2010). Well teachers, well students. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 4(1), 19-34.
  21. Milatz, A., Lüftenegger, M., & Schober, B. (2015). Teachers‘ relationship closeness with students as a resource for teacher wellbeing: A response surface analytical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1949), 1-16.
  22. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  23. Osuch, A., & Majchrzak, O. (2023). The role of positive institutions in language teachers’ well-being. Jezykoznawstwo, 2(19), 249-267.
  24. Pereira, D. S., Gatti, G., & Fave, A. D. (2021). The hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of well-being in teachers. Psicologia dell’ Educazione, 3, 51-67.
  25. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
  26. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
  27. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications
  28. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Free Press.
  29. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job demands and job resources as predictors of teacher motivation and well-being. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1251–1275.
  30. Soini, T., Pyhalto, K., & Pietarinen, J. (2010). Pedagogical well-being: Reflecting learning and well-being in teachers' work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(6), 735-751
  31. Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457-477.
  32. Testa, M. S. A. & Delavin, E. A. (2025). Phenomenology of teachers’ administrative task removal. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(9), 4464-4483.
  33. Thottathil, S. C., & Nandakumar, M. K. (2025). Integrating hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives of well-being: A conceptual model for sustaining employee well-being in the remote work context. Human Resource Development Review, 24(2), 157-198.
  34. Toprak, Z., & Toran, M. (2025). Precariatization of the preschool teachers’ workforce and its consequences on the well-being and in-school relations. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 82(1), 97-110.
  35. Van Petegem, K., Creemers, B. P. M., Rossel, Y., & Aelterman, A. (2005). Relationships between teacher characteristics, interpersonal teacher behaviour and teacher wellbeing. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(2), 34-43.
  36. Zhou, S., Slemp, G.R. & Vella-Brodrick, D.A. (2024). Factors Associated with Teacher Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(63). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x