Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Interdisciplinary consultation trends in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a 5-year retrospective review

Ağız ve çene cerrahisinde disiplinlerarası konsültasyon eğilimleri: 5 yıllık retrospektif inceleme

Tahsin Tepecik(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DENTISTRY PR.)0000-0003-2335-1914
Rukiye Ceren Beker(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DENTISTRY PR.)0009-0009-1946-6955
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results underscore the significant clinical interface between OMS and other medical specialties, highlighting the necessity for structured interdisciplinary collaboration and increased awareness regarding the scope of OMS services in hospital-based care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study seeks to assess the content, frequency range, and practical outcomes of consultations directed to the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) clinic from several medical departments for both outpatient and inpatient care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on outpatient and inpatient consultations referred to the OMS clinic from internal and surgical medical departments at İstanbul Health Sciences University Sultan 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results underscore the significant clinical interface between OMS and other medical specialties, highlighting the necessity for structured interdisciplinary collaboration and increased awareness regarding the scope of OMS services in hospital-based care.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Consultation · awareness · oral and maxillofacial surgery

Abstract

Aims: This study seeks to assess the content, frequency range, and practical outcomes of consultations directed to the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) clinic from several medical departments for both outpatient and inpatient care. The results of this analysis will likely emphasize the importance of managing identified conditions using a multidisciplinary approach and help guide future research in this field. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on outpatient and inpatient consultations referred to the OMS clinic from internal and surgical medical departments at İstanbul Health Sciences University Sultan 2. Abdülhamid Han Traning and Research Hospital from 2017 to 2023. This study systematically analyzes patient demographics, consultation purposes, responses given, and clinical actions completed. The dataset will provide quantitative results regarding the departments that most often request consultations, the main conditions prompting these requests, and the treatments provided. Results: Statistical data indicate that the majority of consultations directed to the OMS clinic originated from the Otolaryngology (ENT) clinic. This is followed by the emergency department, general surgery, anesthesia and reanimation department. Conclusion: This study reveals that the majority of referrals to the OMS clinic originate from the ENT and emergency departments, primarily for temporomandibular joint disorders, sinus pathologies, and maxillofacial trauma. These results underscore the significant clinical interface between OMS and other medical specialties, highlighting the necessity for structured interdisciplinary collaboration and increased awareness regarding the scope of OMS services in hospital-based care.

Özet

Amaç Bu çalışmanın amacı, İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Sultan Abdülhamid Han Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde farklı tıbbi birimlerden Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi (ADÇC) Kliniği’ne yapılan poliklinik ve yatışlı hasta konsültasyonlarının içeriğini, sıklığını ve klinik sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Elde edilen bulguların, multidisipliner iş birliğinin önemini vurgulaması ve gelecekteki araştırmalara yön vermesi beklenmektedir. Yöntem 2017–2023 yılları arasında iç hastalıkları ve cerrahi tıp birimlerinden ADÇC Kliniği’ne yönlendirilen konsültasyonlar retrospektif olarak analiz edilmiştir. Hasta demografisi, konsültasyon nedenleri, verilen yanıtlar ve uygulanan klinik işlemler sistematik olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bu analiz, en sık konsültasyon gönderen bölümleri, yönlendirme nedenlerini ve sağlanan tedavileri nicel olarak ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular Konsültasyonların büyük çoğunluğu Kulak Burun Boğaz (KBB) Kliniği tarafından başlatılmıştır. Bunu Acil Servis, Genel Cerrahi ve Anesteziyoloji-Reanimasyon birimleri takip etmektedir. Sonuç ADÇC Kliniği’ne yapılan yönlendirmelerin çoğu KBB ve Acil Servis kaynaklıdır; en yaygın başvuru nedenleri ise temporomandibular eklem rahatsızlıkları, sinüs patolojileri ve çene-yüz travmalarıdır. Bu sonuçlar, ADÇC ile diğer uzmanlık alanları arasındaki güçlü klinik etkileşimi ortaya koymakta ve hastane temelli sağlık hizmetlerinde yapılandırılmış disiplinler arası iş birliğinin yanı sıra ADÇC’nin rolü konusunda farkındalığın artırılması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tepecik, T., Beker, R. C., Baş, M. Z. (2025). Interdisciplinary consultation trends in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a 5-year retrospective review. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 6 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1672273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Subhashraj K, Subramaniam B. Awareness of the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery among health care professionals in Pondicherry, India. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(11):2330-2334. doi:10.1016/j.joms. 2007.04.025
  2. Islam S. Should we consider devolution of “head and neck” surgery from the specialties of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ear, nose, and throat surgery; and plastic surgery? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(9):976-979. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.07.010
  3. Ameerally P, Fordyce A, Martin I. So you think they know what we do? The public and professional perception of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;32(3):142-145. doi:10.1016/0266-4356(94)90097-3
  4. Shah N, Patel N, Mahajan A, Shah R. Knowledge, attitude and awareness of speciality of oral and maxillofacial surgery amongst medical consultants of Vadodara district in Gujarat state. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14(1):51-56. doi:10.1007/s12663-013-0592-6
  5. Awal D, Amin K, Venda-Nova C, Naqvi A, Zakrzewska J. The specialist management of non-temporomandibular orofacial pain: maxillofacial surgery’s known unknown? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(8):749-754. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.06.024
  6. Inchingolo AM, Malcangi G, Ferrara I, et al. MRONJ treatment strategies: a systematic review and two case reports. Appl Sci. 2023;13(7): 4370. doi:10.3390/app13074370
  7. Çolak S, Demirsoy MS, Erdil A, Keldal G, Altan A, Akbulut N. Evaluation of consultation contents directed from a university training and research hospital to an oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic. Int Dent Res. 2023;13(1):35-43. doi:10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.no1.6
  8. Longoni C, Corsetti A, Freddo AL, Puricelli E, Ponzoni D. Dental consultations requested to the maxillofacial surgery division in a hospital in Brazil. Clin Biomed Res. 2019;39(4):279-283. doi:10.22491/2357-9730. 93275
  9. Ziegeler C, Wasiljeff K, May A. Nondental orofacial pain in dental practices–diagnosis, therapy and self-assessment of German dentists and dental students. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(1):66-71. doi:10.1002/ejp.1283
  10. Arslan ED, Solakoglu AG, Komut E, et al. Assessment of maxillofacial trauma in emergency department. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-13
  11. Clark A, Pretty I. Up to 7% of referrals to oral and maxillofacial surgery are related to medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: how much is really out there? BDJ Open. 2022;8(1):5. doi:10.1038/s41405-022-00097-6
  12. Topuz MF. General characteristics of otorhinolaryngology consultations: 3-year analysis. J Surg Med. 2020;4(10):865-869. doi:10. 28982/josam.794291
  13. Lababidi E, Breik O, Subramaniam S. Perceptions of oral and maxillofacial surgery amongst Australian medical general practitioners. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2018;30(3):229-232. doi:10.1016/j.ajoms.2018.02.003
  14. Bringhurst C, Herr RD, Aldous JA. Oral trauma in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(5):486-490. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(93)90091-o
  15. Tuckett J, Lynham A, Lee G, et al. Maxillofacial trauma in the emergency department: a review. Surgeon. 2014;12(2):106-114. doi:10.1016/j.surge. 2013.07.001
  16. Hammond D, Welbury R, Sammons G, et al. How do oral and maxillofacial surgeons manage concussion? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(2):134-138. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.12.014
  17. Katoumas K, Anterriotis D, Fyrgiola M, et al. Epidemiological analysis of management of severe odontogenic infections before referral to the emergency department. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(8):1292-1299. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.05.002
  18. Greenstein G, Greenstein B. Clinical management of acute orofacial infections. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(2):96-103.
  19. Cambria F, Fusconi M, Candelori F, et al. Surgical multidisciplinary approach in the management of odontogenic or non-odontogenic neck infections. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021;41(Suppl 1):S138. doi:10. 14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-41-2021-14
  20. Rosella D, Papi P, Giardino R, et al. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: clinical and practical guidelines. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(2):97-104. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.178742