Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Comparison of endotracheal tube selection using age-based formulas across body-mass index groups in pediatric patients undergoing nasal intubation for dental treatment under general anesthesia

Hande Güngör(İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8920-1516
Ayşe İnce(ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0003-2082-2602
Sümeyye Yıldız(ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-8155-1618
Tümay Uludağ Yanaral(ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0003-3917-8183
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although higher BMI was associated with greater prediction error, this relationship was weak, suggesting that while age-based formulas remain useful, BMI-related variability should be interpreted cautiously when applying these formulas to improve airway safety and accuracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Accurate endotracheal tube (ETT) selection is essential for pediatric nasal intubation, especially when using age-based predictive formulas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 677 pediatric patients aged 2–10 years who underwent nasal intubation for dental procedures under general anesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although higher BMI was associated with greater prediction error, this relationship was weak, suggesting that while age-based formulas remain useful, BMI-related variability should be interpreted cautiously when applying these formulas to improve airway safety and accuracy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pediatric airway management · endotracheal tube sizing · Motoyama formula

Abstract

Aims: Accurate endotracheal tube (ETT) selection is essential for pediatric nasal intubation, especially when using age-based predictive formulas. The modified Motoyama formula, which adjusts for nasal intubation by selecting a slightly smaller internal diameter and adding length to depth, is commonly used. However, its accuracy across different body-mass index (BMI) groups remains uncertain. Methods: This retrospective study included 677 pediatric patients aged 2–10 years who underwent nasal intubation for dental procedures under general anesthesia. Actual ETT internal diameters and insertion depths were compared with values predicted by the modified Motoyama formula. Patients were stratified by BMI percentile into four groups. Statistical comparisons and Bland–Altman analyses were performed to evaluate prediction accuracy and agreement. Results: The median ETT diameter (4.5 mm) closely matched the modified Motoyama estimate (4.25 mm; p=0.054), while the modified Motoyama formula significantly overestimated ETT insertion depth (actual: 15.5 cm vs. predicted: 16.5 cm), with a median difference of –1.5 cm (IQR: –3.0 to 0.0; p<0.001). BMI showed a weak but significant correlation with prediction errors for both diameter (r=0.165) and depth (r=0.185). No significant variation was found based on chronic disease status. Conclusion: The modified Motoyama formula accurately predicts ETT diameter but tends to overestimate insertion depth in pediatric nasal intubation. Although higher BMI was associated with greater prediction error, this relationship was weak, suggesting that while age-based formulas remain useful, BMI-related variability should be interpreted cautiously when applying these formulas to improve airway safety and accuracy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güngör, H., İnce, A., Yıldız, S., Yanaral, T. U. (2026). Comparison of endotracheal tube selection using age-based formulas across body-mass index groups in pediatric patients undergoing nasal intubation for dental treatment under general anesthesia. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1862977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Stein ML, Park RS, Kovatsis PG. Emerging trends, techniques, and equipment for airway management in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020;30(3):269-279. doi:10.1111/pan.13814
  2. Park S, Shin SW, Kim HJ, et al. Choice of the correct size of endotracheal tube in pediatric patients. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2022;17(4):352-360. doi:10.17085/apm.22215
  3. Tareerath M, Mangmeesri P. Accuracy of age-based formula to predict the size and depth of cuffed oral preformed endotracheal tubes in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Ear Nose Throat J. 2023;102(3):193-197. doi:10.1177/0145561320980511
  4. Zhou M, Xu WY, Xu S, et al. Prediction of endotracheal tube size in pediatric patients: development and validation of machine learning models. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:970646. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.970646
  5. Gupta B, Ahluwalia P. Prediction of endotracheal tube size in the pediatric age group by ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022;38(3):371-383. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_650_20
  6. Fenley H, Voorman M, Dove JT, Greene JS. Predicting pediatric tracheal airway size from anthropomorphic measurements. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;134:110020. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110020
  7. Kim J, Jeon S. Nasotracheal intubation in pediatrics: a narrative review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2024;24(2):81-90. doi:10.17245/jdapm.2024.24. 2.81
  8. Manimalethu R, Krishna S, Shafy SZ, Hakim M, Tobias JD. Choosing endotracheal tube size in children: which formula is best? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;134:110016. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110016
  9. Tsukamoto M, Yamanaka H, Yokoyama T. Predicting the appropriate size of the uncuffed nasotracheal tube for pediatric patients: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):493-495. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2774-6
  10. Tsukamoto M, Taura S, Yamanaka H, Hitosugi T, Yokoyama T. Prediction of appropriate formula for nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(4):2077-2080. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03517-9
  11. Chou CH, Tsai CL, Lin KL, et al. A new formula to predict the size and insertion depth of cuffed nasotracheal tube in children receiving dental surgery: a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12585. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39793-0
  12. Kemper M, Dullenkopf A, Schmidt AR, Gerber A, Weiss M. Nasotracheal intubation depth in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(5):840-846. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu229
  13. Altun D, Orhan-Sungur M, Ali A, Özkan-Seyhan T, Sivrikoz N, Çamcı E. The role of ultrasound in appropriate endotracheal tube size selection in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(10):1015-1020. doi:10. 1111/pan.13220
  14. Zhuang PE, Lu JH, Wang WK, Cheng MH. A new formula based on height for determining endotracheal intubation depth in pediatrics: a prospective study. J Clin Anesth. 2023;86:111079. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane. 2023.111079
  15. Saravia A, Saravia RW, Mudd P, Jones JW. Examining the pediatric subglottic airway by ultrasound: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;166:111482. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111482
  16. Saini N, Reddy A, Hebbar C, Chauhan R, Singh N. Improving the conduit for nasal intubation-the patient's little finger. Paediatr Anaesth. 2024;34(1):92-93. doi:10.1111/pan.14777
  17. Liu Y, Ma W, Liu J. Applications of airway ultrasound for endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(4):1477. doi:10.3390/jcm12041477
  18. Singh S, Jindal P, Ramakrishnan P, Raghuvanshi S. Prediction of endotracheal tube size in children by predicting subglottic diameter using ultrasonographic measurement versus traditional formulas. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(2):93-99. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_390_18
  19. Ebenebe CU, Schriever K, Apostolidou S, et al. Recommendations for endotracheal tube insertion depths in children. Emerg Med J. 2023;40(8): 583-587. doi:10.1136/emermed-2022-212494