Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Impact of vascular access type on dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients

Gamze Ergün(Bartin State Hospital)0000-0003-1605-7231
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

AVF is associated with significantly higher Kt/V values compared with central venous catheter use, though both groups exceeded the KDOQI minimum target of spKt/V ≥1.2.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Vascular access type plays an important role in determining dialysis adequacy in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective observational study included 67 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in the hemodialysis unit of our hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:AVF is associated with significantly higher Kt/V values compared with central venous catheter use, though both groups exceeded the KDOQI minimum target of spKt/V ≥1.2.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hemodialysis · vascular access · dialysis adequacy

Abstract

Aims: Vascular access type plays an important role in determining dialysis adequacy in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of vascular access type on dialysis adequacy and to investigate factors associated with Kt/V values in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 67 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in the hemodialysis unit of our hospital. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from electronic medical records. Dialysis adequacy was assessed using the mean Kt/V values calculated from the last three months. Patients were categorized according to vascular access type as arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or central venous catheter. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors affecting dialysis adequacy. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.07±15.32 years, and 52.2% were female. Among the patients, 47 (70.1%) were using AVF and 20 (29.9%) were undergoing hemodialysis via catheter. The mean Kt/V value was 1.81±0.36. Patients with AVF had significantly higher Kt/V values compared with catheter users (1.95±0.32 vs 1.47±0.18, p=0.001). Female patients also demonstrated higher Kt/V values than male patients (p=0.007); this difference primarily reflects the smaller volume of urea distribution (V) in women rather than superior dialysis delivery. A moderate negative correlation was observed between body mass index and Kt/V (r=-0.504, p<0.01), largely attributable to the larger volume of distribution in patients with greater body mass. Conclusion: Vascular access type significantly affects urea-based dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) in hemodialysis patients. AVF is associated with significantly higher Kt/V values compared with central venous catheter use, though both groups exceeded the KDOQI minimum target of spKt/V ≥1.2.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ergün, G. (2026). Impact of vascular access type on dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1930864

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Inrig J, Mehrotra R, Rocco MV, Suri RS. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(5):884-930. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015
  2. Canaud B, Kooman JP, Selby NM, Taal MW, Francis S. Dialysis-induced cardiovascular and multiorgan morbidity. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(11): 1856-1869. doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2020.08.031
  3. Lok CE, Yuo T, Lee T. Hemodialysis vascular access: core curriculum 2025. Am J Kidney Dis. 2025;85(2):236-252. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.05.021
  4. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, Shenoy S, Yevzlin AS, Abreo K. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001
  5. Masud A, Costanzo EJ, Zuckerman R, Asif A. The complications of vascular access in hemodialysis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2018;44(1):57-59. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606180
  6. Venegas-Ramírez J, Hernández-Fuentes GA, Palomares C, et al. Vascular access type and survival outcomes in hemodialysis patients: a seven-year cohort study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(4):584. doi:10.3390/medicina61040584
  7. Ștefan G, Podgoreanu E, Mircescu G. Patterns and outcomes of vascular access in hemodialysis: a nationwide registry-based study from Romania. Ren Fail. 2025;47(1):2514830. doi:10.1080/0886022X.2025.2514830
  8. Nagy E, Salem K, Abdelsalam M, et al. Trends in vascular access among patients on hemodialysis: a nationwide survey from Egypt. BMC Nephrol. 2025;26(1):361. doi:10.1186/s12882-025-04296-9
  9. Allon M. Vascular access for hemodialysis patients: new data should guide decision making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(6):954-961. doi:10.2215/CJN.00490119
  10. Ravani P, Quinn R, Oliver M, et al. Examining the association between hemodialysis access type and mortality: the role of access complications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(6):955-964. doi:10.2215/CJN.12181116
  11. Pisoni RL, Zepel L, Port FK, Robinson BM. Trends in US vascular access use, patient preferences, and related practices: an update from the US DOPPS practice monitor with international comparisons. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6):905-915. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.014
  12. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(25): 2010-2019. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa021583
  13. Riehl-Tonn VJ, Nicholl DDM, Ronksley PE, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M. Sex differences in associations between measures of hemodialysis adequacy and quality, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality: a systematic review. Kidney Med. 2026;8(3):101246. doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2026.101246
  14. Hong WP, Lee YJ. The association of dialysis adequacy, body-mass index, and mortality among hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2019; 20(1):382. doi:10.1186/s12882-019-1570-0