SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Infant mortality and stillbirths: a regional retrospective study

Yiğit Şenol(AFYONKARAHISAR HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2220-4595
Hakkı Öztürk(Afyonkarahisar İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0000-0002-1600-5637
Ayşe Özkan(Sinanpaşa Devlet Hastanesi)0009-0009-7280-663X
Fatma Dilan Özdemir(Afyonkarahisar İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0009-0006-2874-840X
Betül Gezer Kaçar(Afyonkarahisar İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0009-0002-4291-0689
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In particular, the upward trend observed in the first six months of 2025 indicates the need to strengthen preventive healthcare services, improve the effectiveness of antenatal monitoring, and prioritise interventions targeting the early neonatal period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The rates of infant mortality and stillbirths are crucial measures of healthcare quality and societal development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant strides have been achieved worldwide in lowering infant mortality rates since 1990.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In particular, the upward trend observed in the first six months of 2025 indicates the need to strengthen preventive healthcare services, improve the effectiveness of antenatal monitoring, and prioritise interventions targeting the early neonatal period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Stillbirth · infant mortality · neonatal mortality

Abstract

Aims: The rates of infant mortality and stillbirths are crucial measures of healthcare quality and societal development. Significant strides have been achieved worldwide in lowering infant mortality rates since 1990. The infant mortality rate in Turkiye experienced a rapid decline up to 2010 but has stabilised since then. This study aims to investigate infant mortality and stillbirths comparatively within a provincial sample during 2024 and the first six months of 2025 to determine the factors influencing their temporal distribution patterns. Methods: This study is a retrospective descriptive investigation examining infant deaths and stillbirths. The study population consists of all reported infant deaths and stillbirths in a specified province between 1 January 2024 and 30 June 2025, evaluated in six-month periods. Results: The infant mortality rate increased significantly in the first half of 2025 compared with previous periods, standing at 6.5‰ in the first half of 2024, 5.6‰ in the second half of 2024, and 10.3‰ in the first half of 2025 (p=0.048). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in stillbirth rates between the periods (p>0.05). The proportion of male infants in the infant mortality group was significantly higher in the first half of 2025 (p=0.016). In the stillbirth group, the interval between pregnancies of ≥2 years (p=0.026) and the number of live births (p=0.047) were significantly higher in the first half of 2025. Other maternal, obstetric and neonatal characteristics were found to be similar between the periods. Conclusion: In particular, the upward trend observed in the first six months of 2025 indicates the need to strengthen preventive healthcare services, improve the effectiveness of antenatal monitoring, and prioritise interventions targeting the early neonatal period.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şenol, Y., Öztürk, H., Özkan, A., Özdemir, F. D., Kaçar, B. G. (2026). Infant mortality and stillbirths: a regional retrospective study. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1906808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Eryer A, Ata A. Sağlık harcamaları ve gelir dağılımının bebek ölüm hızı üzerine etkisi: OECD ülkeleri üzerine ekonometrik bir inceleme. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniv Sosyal Bil Derg. 2024;21(1):174-189. doi:10.33437/KSUSBD.1358615
  2. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Bebek Ölümleri İzleme Sistemi Genelgesi. 2018 [Internet]. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/programlar/bebek-cocuk-olumleri.html Accessed 27.01.2026.
  3. World Health Organization. Child mortality and causes of death [Internet]. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/child-mortality-and-causes-of-death Accessed:12.01.2026.
  4. Bishai DM, Cohen R, Alfonso YN, Adam T, Kuruvilla S, Schweitzer J. Factors contributing to maternal and child mortality reductions in 146 low- and middle-income countries between 1990 and 2010. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0144908. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0144908
  5. Tezel B, Aydın Ş. Sağlık Bakanlığının kuruluşunun 100. yılında Türkiye’de bebek ölümleri durum raporu. Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı; 2021.
  6. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):691-702. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X
  7. Qureshi ZU, Millum J, Blencowe H, et al. Stillbirth should be given greater priority on the global health agenda. BMJ. 2015;351:h4620. doi:10.1136/BMJ.H4620
  8. Zupan Jelka, Åhman Elisabeth. Neonatal and perinatal mortality: country, regional and global estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
  9. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331-1340. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7
  10. Kasa GA, Woldemariam AY, Adella A, Alemu B. The factors associated with stillbirths among sub-saharan African deliveries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):835. doi:10.1186/s12884-023-06148-6
  11. Kefale B, Jancey J, Gebremedhin AT, et al. Risk factors for neonatal mortality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;88:103525. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103525
  12. Richter R, Bergmann RL, Dudenhausen JW. Previous caesarean or vaginal delivery: which mode is a greater risk of perinatal death at the second delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biol. 2007;132(1):51-57. doi:10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2006.06.002
  13. Wong C, Schreiber V, Crawford K, Kumar S. Male infants are at higher risk of neonatal mortality and severe morbidity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63(4):550-555. doi:10.1111/AJO.13689
  14. Faas D, Vajz M, Hennewig U, et al. 985 male very-low-birth-weight and very-low- gestational-age infants have adverse perinatal outcomes. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(Suppl 2):A282. doi:10.1136/ARCHDISCHILD-2012-302724.0985
  15. Hadar E, Melamed N, Sharon-Weiner M, et al. The association between stillbirth and fetal gender. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(2):158-161. doi:10.3109/14767058.2011.565838
  16. Engel PJ, Smith R, Brinsmead MW, Bowe SJ, Clifton VL. Male sex and pre-existing diabetes are independent risk factors for stillbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(4):375-383. doi:10.1111/J.1479-828X.2008.00863.X
  17. Ivanov DO, Олегович ИД, Shevtsova KG, et al. Results of the perinatal audit of the Northwestern Federal District. Kazan Med J. 2020;101(5): 727-733. doi:10.17816/KMJ2020-727
  18. Gupta PM, Freedman AA, Kramer MR, et al. Interpregnancy interval and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;35:35-41. doi:10.1016/J.ANNEPIDEM.2019.05.001
  19. Smith GCS, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002;287(20):2684-2690. doi:10.1001/JAMA.287.20.2684
  20. Thoma ME, Rossen LM, De Silva DA, et al. Beyond birth outcomes: interpregnancy interval and injury-related infant mortality. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(5):360-370. doi:10.1111/PPE.12575
  21. Hindin MJ, Kalamar AM, Thompson TA, Upadhyay UD. Interventions to prevent unintended and repeat pregnancy among young people in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the published and gray literature. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(3):8-15. doi:10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2016.04.021
  22. Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reproductive Health. 2018;15(1):100. doi:10.1186/S12978-018-0526-3
  23. Jacques SM, Qureshi F, Johnson A, Alkatib AA, Kmak DC. Estimation of time of fetal death in the second trimester by placental histopathological examination. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6(3):226-232. doi:10.1007/s10024-003-8089-9
  24. Milton R, Modibbo F, Gillespie D, et al. Incidence and sociodemographic, living environment and maternal health associations with stillbirth in a tertiary healthcare setting in Kano, Northern Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):692. doi:10.1186/S12884-022-04971-X
  25. Okonofua FE, Ntoimo LFC, Ogu R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of stillbirth in Nigerian referral hospitals: a multicentre study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):533. doi:10.1186/S12884-019-2682-Z
  26. Narain S, McEwan A. Antenatal assessment of fetal well-being. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2023;33(8):217-224. doi:10.1016/J.OGRM.2023.05.002
  27. Bekiou A, Gourounti K. Reduced fetal movements and perinatal mortality. Mater Sociomed. 2020;32(3):227. doi:10.5455/MSM.2020.32.227-234