Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Identification of a reliable palpable landmark for ankle centre localization for use in total knee arthroplasty

Volkan Kızılkaya(özel metrolife hastanesi)0000-0002-7472-3303
Namık Kemal Kılınçcıoğlu(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TAYFUR ATA SÖKMEN TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2920-769X
Sefa Erdem Karapınar(SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-6878-2243
Mehmet Melih Asoğlu(özel metrolife hastanesi)0000-0001-5872-5758
Mehmet Fatih Uzun(yozgat şehir hastanesi)0000-0003-2327-5536
Anıl Aydın(kayseri şehir hastanesi)0009-0008-6977-7500
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The lateral border of the tibialis anterior tendon appears to be a relatively consistent and reliable palpable landmark for ankle centre localization, with minimal influence from demographic factors, and may serve as a practical reference for distal alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate the reliability of commonly used palpable anatomical landmarks for ankle centre localization and to determine the influence of demographic factors on these measurements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients with normal ankle anatomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The lateral border of the tibialis anterior tendon appears to be a relatively consistent and reliable palpable landmark for ankle centre localization, with minimal influence from demographic factors, and may serve as a practical reference for distal alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alignment accuracy · demographic factors · magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the reliability of commonly used palpable anatomical landmarks for ankle centre localization and to determine the influence of demographic factors on these measurements. Methods: This retrospective study included 80 patients with normal ankle anatomy. The ankle centre was defined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on the talar dome, and distances to three palpable landmarks, the lateral border of the tibialis anterior tendon, the intermalleolar midpoint, and the extensor hallucis longus tendon—were measured. Comparisons were performed according to sex and age groups. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationships between variables and the effect of demographic factors. Results: The mean distance to the lateral border of the tibialis anterior tendon was significantly greater in males compared to females (10.01±1.25 mm vs. 9.16±1.10 mm, p=0.004). No significant sex-related differences were observed for the intermalleolar midpoint (2.12±0.62 mm vs. 2.33±0.60 mm, p=0.165) or the extensor hallucis longus (1.65±0.43 mm vs. 1.66±0.36 mm, p=0.902). Age group analysis showed no significant differences for the tibialis anterior tendon (p=0.382) or the intermalleolar midpoint (p=0.248), whereas a significant difference was found for the extensor hallucis longus (p=0.035). In regression analysis, male gender was independently associated with the tibialis anterior tendon distance (β=0.319, p=0.004), while age was not a significant predictor for any parameter. Conclusion: The lateral border of the tibialis anterior tendon appears to be a relatively consistent and reliable palpable landmark for ankle centre localization, with minimal influence from demographic factors, and may serve as a practical reference for distal alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kızılkaya, V., Kılınçcıoğlu, N. K., Karapınar, S. E., Asoğlu, M. M., Uzun, M. F., Aydın, A. (2026). Identification of a reliable palpable landmark for ankle centre localization for use in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1943097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(17):1455-1460. doi:10.2106/JBJS.17.01617
  2. Diconi AF, Roman MD, Cristian AN, et al. The effects of biomechanical loading on the tibial insert after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2025;14(4):1043. doi:10.3390/jcm14041043
  3. Foissey C, Batailler C, Vahabi A, Fontalis A, Servien E, Lustig S. Combination of a high residual varus and joint-line lowering strongly increases the risk of early implant failure in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(11):2275-2281. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.055
  4. Cinotti G, Sessa P, Rocca AD, Ripani FR, Giannicola G. Effects of tibial torsion on distal alignment of extramedullary instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(3):275-279. doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.792032
  5. Asada S, Mori S, Inoue S, Tsukamoto I, Akagi M. Location of the ankle center for total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2017;24(1):121-127. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2016.09.019
  6. Karade V, Ravi B, Agarwal M. Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial cutting guides in megaprosthetic total knee replacement. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:33. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-7-33
  7. Li M, Li J, Hu S, Jia B. Comparison of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(5): e32277. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000032277
  8. Zhao DH, Huang DC, Zhang GH, et al. Talar dome investigation and talocrural joint axis analysis based on three-dimensional (3D) models: implications for prosthetic design. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:8634159. doi:10.1155/2019/8634159
  9. Jang SJ, Kunze KN, Brilliant ZR, et al. Comparison of tibial alignment parameters based on clinically relevant anatomical landmarks: a deep learning radiological analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3(10):767-776. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0082.R1
  10. Hino M, Nakagawa S, Arai Y, et al. Extensor hallucis longus tendon is a new distal landmark for coronal tibial component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a study of magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(1):2309499020912340. doi:10.1177/2309499020912340
  11. Schneider M, Heisel C, Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ. Use of palpable tendons for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(2):219-226. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.023
  12. Men J, Liang HG, Wang ZW, Sun P, Feng W. Efficacy analysis of selection of distal reference point for tibial coronal plane osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(5):1682-1693. doi:10.1111/os.13054
  13. Olewnik Ł, Landfald IC, Aragonés P. Revisiting the extensor hallucis longus tendon: anatomical classification and orthopedic implications. J Clin Med. 2025;14(19):6925. doi:10.3390/jcm14196925
  14. Park JH, Choi YJ, Lee M, et al. Anatomical characteristics of extensor hallucis longus tendon variations and its clinical implications: a Korean cadaveric study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):9833. doi:10.3390/ijerph19169833
  15. Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, et al. Alignment evaluation using different distal reference points after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2021;25: 186-190. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.013
  16. Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(436):172-176. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000160027.52481.32
  17. Ashton DM, Blaker CL, Hartnell N, et al. Challenging the perceptions of human tendon allografts: influence of donor age, sex, height, and tendon on biomechanical properties. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(3):768-778. doi:10.1177/03635465221143385
  18. Mansur H, Durigan JLQ, de Noronha M, et al. Differences in the cross-sectional area along the ankle tendons with both age and sex. J Anat. 2023;242(2):213-223. doi:10.1111/joa.13774
  19. Clinger BN, Plaster S, Passarelli T, Marshall J, Wascher DC. Differentiation in posterior tibial slope by sex, age, and race: a cadaveric study utilizing 3-dimensional computerized tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(10):2698-2704. doi:10.1177/03635465221108187
  20. Jang SJ, Kunze KN, Brilliant ZR, et al. Comparison of tibial alignment parameters based on clinically relevant anatomical landmarks: a deep learning radiological analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3(10):767-776. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0082.R1