Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Impact of structured cardiac rehabilitation on cardiometabolic risk and body composition: assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis

Muhammet Cihat Çelik(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6496-7849
Mucahit Yetim(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-2444-7523
Macit Kalçık(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8791-4475
Abdullah Sarıhan(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0001-8505-9460
Mehmet Murat Şahin(HITIT UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0001-8798-6789
Abdülmelik Birgün(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0008-9864-4715
Ömer Burak Çelik(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0006-9790-6435
Gamze Nur Ahıskalı(erol olçok training and research hospital cardiac rehabilitation center)0000-0001-7299-3839
Ceren Yağmur Doğru Yılmaz(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-4403-8492
Yusuf Karavelioğlu(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-2544-1975
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results confirm the metabolic benefits of CR while emphasizing the importance of incorporating structured resistance training and nutritional strategies to preserve muscle mass during rehabilitation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-recommended, multidisciplinary intervention that improves functional capacity and reduces cardiovascular risk.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 452 patients (mean age 56.6±9.4 years; 54.2% male) with cardiovascular disease who completed a 12-week CR program comprising supervised aerobic and resistance exercise, nutritional counseling, and risk factor management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results confirm the metabolic benefits of CR while emphasizing the importance of incorporating structured resistance training and nutritional strategies to preserve muscle mass during rehabilitation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cardiac rehabilitation · body composition · bioelectrical impedance analysis

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-recommended, multidisciplinary intervention that improves functional capacity and reduces cardiovascular risk. However, its effects on detailed body composition parameters remain less consistently investigated. Methods: This retrospective study included 452 patients (mean age 56.6±9.4 years; 54.2% male) with cardiovascular disease who completed a 12-week CR program comprising supervised aerobic and resistance exercise, nutritional counseling, and risk factor management. Laboratory tests and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed before and after CR. Results: CR led to significant improvements in cardiometabolic parameters. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL levels decreased, whereas HDL increased nonsignificantly. HbA1c declined slightly (6.2% vs. 6.1%, p<0.001), and BNP decreased, while CRP showed no change. Body composition analysis revealed reductions in BMI (30.0 vs. 29.6 kg/m², p<0.001), body fat percentage (30.5% vs. 29.9%, p<0.001), fat mass (24.9 vs. 24.2 kg, p<0.001), and visceral fat ratio (12.1 vs. 11.8, p<0.001). Lean mass (55.7 vs. 55.5 kg, p<0.001) and muscle mass (53.1 vs. 52.8 kg, p<0.001) also showed small but significant declines. Hydration improved, indicated by a higher total body water percentage and lower extracellular-to-total water ratio. Conclusion: CR was associated with improvements in lipid profile, glycemic control, BNP, and body composition, with beneficial fat reduction and fluid redistribution but mild lean mass loss. These results confirm the metabolic benefits of CR while emphasizing the importance of incorporating structured resistance training and nutritional strategies to preserve muscle mass during rehabilitation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, M. C., Yetim, M., Kalçık, M., Sarıhan, A., Şahin, M. M., Birgün, A., Çelik, Ö. B., Ahıskalı, G. N., Yılmaz, C. Y. D., Karavelioğlu, Y. (2026). Impact of structured cardiac rehabilitation on cardiometabolic risk and body composition: assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1859650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, et al. Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(25):2951-2960. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b21e2
  2. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(1):1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
  3. Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Normand SL, Ades PA, Prottas J, Stason WB. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1653-1662. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.701466
  4. Rauch B, Davos CH, Doherty P, et al. The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies-The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(18):1914-1939. doi:10.1177/2047487316671181
  5. Turk-Adawi K, Sarrafzadegan N, Grace SL. Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(10):586-596. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98
  6. Mirman AM, Nardoni NR, Chen AY, Horwich TB. Body composition changes during traditional versus intensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020;40(6):388-393. doi:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000497
  7. Pack QR, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Thomas RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of weight loss to predict body fatness improvement in cardiac rehabilitation patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013;33(2):68-76. doi:10.1097/HCR.0b013e31827fe7e3
  8. Neeland IJ, Ross R, Després JP, et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):715-725. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30084-1
  9. Ślązak A, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Assessment of qualitative body composition, including phase angle, in the context of primary prevention and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (cardiac rehabilitation). Med Pr. 2024;75(3):243-254. doi:10.13075/mp.5893.01495
  10. Wu G, Hu Y, Ding K, Li X, Li J, Shang Z. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on lipid levels in patients with coronary heart disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Heart. 2022;17(1):83. doi:10.5334/gh.1170
  11. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Franklin B. Aerobic exercise and lipids and lipoproteins in patients with cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(3):131-144. doi:10.1097/00008483-200605000-00002
  12. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682-692. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009
  13. Umpierre D, Ribeiro PA, Kramer CK, et al. Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(17): 1790-1799. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.576
  14. Jelinek HF, Huang ZQ, Khandoker AH, Chang D, Kiat H. Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes following a 6-week program of PCI and CABG patients. Front Physiol. 2013;4:302. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00302
  15. Lavie CJ, Church TS, Milani RV, Earnest CP. Impact of physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and exercise training on markers of inflammation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31(3):137-145. doi:10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182122827
  16. Morikawa S, Okumura K, Inoue N, Ogane T, Takayama Y, Murohara T. Systemic Immune-inflammation Index as a predictor of prognosis after carotid artery stenting compared with C-reactive protein. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288564. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288564
  17. Mandic S, Hodge C, Stevens E, et al. Effects of community-based cardiac rehabilitation on body composition and physical function in individuals with stable coronary artery disease: 1.6-year followup. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:903604. doi:10.1155/2013/903604
  18. Savage PA, Shaw AO, Miller MS, et al. Effect of resistance training on physical disability in chronic heart failure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(8):1379-1386. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820eeea1
  19. Pierson LM, Herbert WG, Norton HJ, et al. Effects of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21(2):101-110. doi:10.1097/00008483-200103000-00007
  20. Mahmoodi Z, Salari A, Ahmadnia Z, Roushan ZA, Gholipour M, Sedighinejad A. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure: effects on echocardiographic parameters and functional capacity: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(5):2696-2701. doi:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003006
  21. Patti A, Merlo L, Ambrosetti M, Sarto P. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs in heart failure patients. Heart Fail Clin. 2021; 17(2):263-271. doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2021.01.007
  22. Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, et al. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(5):610-615. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2011.04.001
  23. Williams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, et al. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007;116(5):572-584. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185214