Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Which clinical parameter is more closely associated with functionality and quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder: shoulder range of motion or pain intensity?

Ali Aydilek(Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology)0000-0003-1413-0781
Merve Görgülü(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON (DR))0009-0006-8563-2075
Ayfer Ezgi Yılmaz Çakıroğlu(Hacettepe University, Department of Statistics)0000-0002-6214-8014
Aydan Örsçelik(Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Sports Medicine)0000-0002-8610-8869
Tuğba Kocahan(Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Sports Medicine)0000-0002-0567-857X
Bihter Akınoğlu(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation)0000-0002-8214-7895
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings support the combined assessment of ROM and pain characteristics in clinical evaluation and rehabilitation planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to determine whether shoulder range of motion (ROM) or pain intensity was more closely associated with functionality and quality of life in individuals with frozen shoulder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 34 individuals with frozen shoulder aged 25-78 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings support the combined assessment of ROM and pain characteristics in clinical evaluation and rehabilitation planning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Frozen shoulder · range of motion · pain intensity

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to determine whether shoulder range of motion (ROM) or pain intensity was more closely associated with functionality and quality of life in individuals with frozen shoulder. It also sought to identify which ROM directions and pain characteristics showed the strongest relationships with functional limitation and health-related quality-of-life domains. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 34 individuals with frozen shoulder aged 25-78 years. Demographic data, shoulder ROM, pain intensity, functional status, and quality-of-life measures were obtained from medical records. ROM was assessed with a goniometer, pain with the Visual Analog Scale, function with DASH and SPADI, and quality of life with SF-36. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses were used according to data distribution, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Weak to moderate correlations were observed among ROM, pain intensity, functional status, and quality-of-life measures. Active and passive shoulder flexion and abduction were consistently associated with functional outcomes, whereas activity-related pain and night pain were predominantly associated with health-related quality-of-life measures (r=−0.383 to −0.598, all p<0.05). Among pain variables, activity-related pain and night pain were most closely associated with quality-of-life measures, with night pain showing the strongest correlations across several SF-36 domains (r=−0.353 to −0.585, all p<0.05). Conclusion: In individuals with frozen shoulder, flexion and abduction ROM showed comparatively stronger associations with functional outcomes, whereas activity-related pain and night pain showed stronger associations with several quality of-life domains. These findings support the combined assessment of ROM and pain characteristics in clinical evaluation and rehabilitation planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydilek, A., Görgülü, M., Çakıroğlu, A. E. Y., Örsçelik, A., Kocahan, T., Akınoğlu, B. (2026). Which clinical parameter is more closely associated with functionality and quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder: shoulder range of motion or pain intensity?. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1977349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Ewald A. Adhesive capsulitis: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(4): 417-422.
  2. Zuckerman JD, Rokito A. Frozen shoulder: a consensus definition. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2):322-325. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.008
  3. Tomar A, Kataria DJ. Effectiveness of maitland mobilization technique in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis: systematic review. 2024;3(3).
  4. Wang K, Ho V, Hunter-Smith DJ, Beh PS, Smith KM, Weber AB. Risk factors in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: a case control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(7):e24-e29. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.049
  5. Neviaser AS, Neviaser RJ. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(9):536-542. doi:10.5435/00124635-201109000-00004
  6. Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(11):2346-2356. doi:10.1177/ 0363546509348048
  7. Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, et al. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):A1-A31. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.0302
  8. Toprak M, Erden M. Sleep quality, pain, anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder1. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(2):287-291. doi:10.3233/BMR-171010
  9. Poser A, Brindisino F, Lot S, et al. Is disability associated with range of motion, pain and mental health-related quality of life in subjects with frozen shoulder? A cross-sectional study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025; 41(12):2560-2571. doi:10.1080/09593985.2025.2530197
  10. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227-236. doi:10.1002/nur.4770130405
  11. Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, et al. Kol, Omuz ve El Sorunları (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH) Anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 2006;17(3):99-107.
  12. Bumin G, Tüzün EH, Tonga E. (2008). The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabilit. 2008;21(1):57-62. doi:10.3233/BMR-2008-21108
  13. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A, Fişek E. Kısa form-36 (KF36)’nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenirliliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Derg. 1999;12(2):102-106.
  14. Bagheri F, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Bidgoli HF. Factors associated with pain, disability and quality of life in patients suffering from frozen shoulder. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4(3):243-247.
  15. Eldeab SR, El Nahass BGE, Ibrahim MM, Sarhan MA. (2025). Correlation between functional disability and shoulder ROM in patients with primary frozen shoulder. Fizjoterapia Polska. 2025;25(4):198-204. doi:10.56984/8ZGA431542L
  16. Kraal T, de Wit Y, The B, et al. Improved range of motion after manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy for stage two frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial. JSES Int. 2023;8(2):293-298. doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004
  17. Doner G, Guven Z, Atalay A, Celiker R. Evalution of Mulligan's technique for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45(1):87-91. doi:10.2340/16501977-1064
  18. Venturin D, Giannotta G, Pellicciari L, et al. Reliability and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in a sample of patients with frozen shoulder. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):212. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06268-2
  19. Shafqat A, Alam MM, Akhtar MW, et al. (2024). Correlation between pain and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis. J Health Rehabilit Res. 2024;4(1):853-857. doi:10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.519
  20. Shahjahan M, Patil S. Effect of Gleno-humeralcapsulo-ligamentous stretch Maneuvers on range of motion in bilateral frozen shoulder. Int J Physiother Res. 2022;10(5):4364-4368. doi:10.16965/ijpr.2022.156
  21. Mertens MG, Meeus M, Noten S, et al. Understanding the clinical profile of patients with frozen shoulder: a longitudinal multicentre observational study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(11):e056563. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056563
  22. Fernandes MR. Patient-reported measures of quality of life and functional capacity in adhesive capsulitis. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2017;63(4):347-354. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.63.04.347
  23. Kim S, Oh J. Shoulder pain, disability, health-related quality of life, and stress. Pain Manag Nurs. 2026;27(2):e113-e122. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.09.001
  24. Abodonya AM, Alrawaili SM, Abdelbasset WK. Evaluation of shoulder pain, disability, mobility, and quality of life in patients with adhesive capsulitis following suprascapular nerve block combined with low-intensity laser therapy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(3):845-851. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202302_31176
  25. Rodgers S, Brealey S, Jefferson L, et al. Exploring the outcomes in studies of primary frozen shoulder: is there a need for a core outcome set?. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2495-2504. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0708-6