AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightResults: Overall, 64.7% of participants reported referring patients for CBCT imaging, with implant planning being the most common indication (59.1%).
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) usage patterns, knowledge levels, and clinical approaches among general dentists and specialists, and to examine the effect of professional status on CBCT referral behavior, image interpretation practices, and awareness of incidental findings. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study included 275 dentists, comprising 155 specialists and 120 general dentists. Data were collected using an 18-item questionnaire assessing CBCT referral frequency, clinical indications, educational background, image evaluation habits, radiation awareness, and attitudes toward incidental findings. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between specialists and general dentists were performed using the Pearson Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with CBCT referral behavior. Results: Overall, 64.7% of participants reported referring patients for CBCT imaging, with implant planning being the most common indication (59.1%). Most respondents (81.8%) had not received formal CBCT interpretation training. Specialists reported encountering incidental findings significantly more frequently than general dentists (52.9% vs. 31.7%, p<0.001). In total, 82.9% believed that the entire CBCT volume should be evaluated by a qualified specialist, 90.2% preferred a radiologist prepared CBCT report, and 88% were willing to attend a structured CBCT course. Logistic regression showed that specialist status, private-sector practice, and previous CBCT interpretation training were significantly associated with CBCT referral behavior. Conclusion: Although CBCT is widely used in dental practice, important gaps remain in interpretation training, volumetric assessment, and management of incidental findings. Structured CBCT education and multidisciplinary reporting practices should be strengthened.