SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Medical Innovation and Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

3D Printer Assisted C1-C2 Posterior Spinal Fusion

3B Yazıcı Destekli C1-C2 Posterior Spinal Füzyon

İnan Uzunoğlu(Katip Celebi Unıversity Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir, Turkey)0000-0001-5859-0443
R. Buğra Hüsemoğlu(Dokuz Eylul University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Biomechanics, Izmir, Turkey)0000-0003-1979-160X
İlker Deniz Cingöz(Kutahya University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Kutahya, Turkey)0000-0002-0452-7606
Ceren Kızmazoğlu(Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir, Turkey)0000-0001-6146-0842
Murat Sayın(Katip Celebi Unıversity Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir, Turkey)0000-0001-8745-2656
Nurullah Yüceer(Katip Celebi Unıversity Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir, Turkey)0000-0003-3509-9939
Pages
63–66
Publication Date
2019-12-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We performed a posterior C1-C2 fusion procedure in a 62-year-old patient who developed odontoid fracture after trauma with the help of anatomical simulation we wrote with a 3D printer and we wanted to present this case.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Odontoid fractures often occur after trauma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The vascular and neural structures that are close in the cases planned for surgery increase the complications of the operation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We performed a posterior C1-C2 fusion procedure in a 62-year-old patient who developed odontoid fracture after trauma with the help of anatomical simulation we wrote with a 3D printer and we wanted to present this case.
🔬Design:Olgu Sunumu
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Odontoid kırığı · C1-2 posterior füzyon · Odontoid fractures

Abstract

Odontoid fractures often occur after trauma. The vascular and neural structures that are close in the cases planned for surgery increase the complications of the operation. With the recent technological advances, anatomic simulations with 3D printers have enabled the operation to be performed in less time with less risk in order to perform safer surgery. We performed a posterior C1-C2 fusion procedure in a 62-year-old patient who developed odontoid fracture after trauma with the help of anatomical simulation we wrote with a 3D printer and we wanted to present this case.

Özet

Odontoid kırıklar sıklıkla travma sonrası ortaya çıkmaktadır. Cerrahi planlanan vakalarda yakın bulunan vaskuler ve nöral yapılar operasyonun komplikasyonlarını arttırmaktadır. Son dönemde artan teknolojik gelişmeler ile birlikte daha güvenli cerrahi yapılabilmesi için 3 boyutlu yazıcılar ile anatomik simülasyonlar operasyonun daha az riskle daha kısa zamanda yapılabilmesi imkanını sağlamıştır. Biz 62 yaşında travma sonrası odontoid kırığı gelişen bir hastamızda posterior C1-C2 fuzyon işlemini 3boyutlu yazıcı ile yazdığımız anatomik simülasyon yardımı ile yaptık ve bu vakamızı sunmak istedik.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzunoğlu, İ., Hüsemoğlu, R. B., Cingöz, İ. D., Kızmazoğlu, C., Sayın, M., Yüceer, N. (2019). 3D Printer Assisted C1-C2 Posterior Spinal Fusion. Journal of Medical Innovation and Technology, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 63–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/1510434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zheng Y, Hao D, Wang B, He B, Hu H, Zhang H. Clinical outcome of posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial instability: A retrospective study of 86 patients. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2016;32:47-50.
  2. Gonschorek O, Vordemvenne T, Blattert T, Katscher S, Schnake KJ, Spine Section of the German Society for O, et al. Treatment of Odontoid Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Global spine journal. 2018;8(2 Suppl):12S-7S.
  3. Guo F, Dai J, Zhang J, Ma Y, Zhu G, Shen J, et al. Individualized 3D printing navigation template for pedicle screw fixation in upper cervical spine. PloS one. 2017;12(2):e0171509.
  4. Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Surgical treatment of Type II odontoid fractures: anterior odontoid screw fixation or posterior cervical instrumented fusion? Neurosurgical focus. 2015;38(4):E11.
  5. Maak TG, Grauer JN. The contemporary treatment of odontoid injuries. Spine. 2006;31(11 Suppl):S53-60; discussion S1.
  6. Vasudevan K, Grossberg JA, Spader HS, Torabi R, Oyelese AA. Age increases the risk of immediate postoperative dysphagia and pneumonia after odontoid screw fixation. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2014;126:185-9.
  7. Agrillo A, Russo N, Marotta N, Delfini R. Treatment of remote type ii axis fractures in the elderly: feasibility of anterior odontoid screw fixation. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(6):1145-50; discussion 50-1.
  8. Henry AD, Bohly J, Grosse A. Fixation of odontoid fractures by an anterior screw. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 1999;81(3):472-7.
  9. Uehara M, Takahashi J, Ikegami S, Kuraishi S, Shimizu M, Futatsugi T, et al. Are pedicle screw perforation rates influenced by distance from the reference frame in multilevel registration using a computed tomography-based navigation system in the setting of scoliosis? The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2017;17(4):499-504.
  10. Hecht N, Kamphuis M, Czabanka M, Hamm B, Konig S, Woitzik J, et al. Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO((R)) CT scanner. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2016;25(3):716-23.
  11. Jing L, Sun Z, Zhang P, Wang J, Wang G. Accuracy of Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes After O-Arm-Navigated Occipitocervical Fusion. World neurosurgery. 2018;117:e653-e9.
  12. Gao F, Wang Q, Liu C, Xiong B, Luo T. Individualized 3D printed model-assisted posterior screw fixation for the treatment of craniovertebral junction abnormality: a retrospective study. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2017;27(1):29-34.
  13. Zheng Y, Hao D, Wang B, He B, Hu H, Zhang H. Clinical outcome of posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial instability: A retrospective study of 86 patients. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2016;32:47-50.
  14. Uehara M, Takahashi J, Ikegami S, Kuraishi S, Shimizu M, Futatsugi T, et al. Are pedicle screw perforation rates influenced by distance from the reference frame in multilevel registration using a computed tomography-based navigation system in the setting of scoliosis? The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2017;17(4):499-504.
  15. Hecht N, Kamphuis M, Czabanka M, Hamm B, Konig S, Woitzik J, et al. Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO((R)) CT scanner. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2016;25(3):716-23.