SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2018 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Built Environment Design and Sustainability in Urban Renewal

Kentsel Dönüşümde Yapılı Çevre Tasarımı ve Sürdürülebilirlik İlişkisi

Serkan YILDIZ
SERKAN KIVRAK
GÖKHAN ARSLAN
Pages
53–75
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is evaluated that the results will lead to the stakeholders of urban renewal in the direction of creating livable cities

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A major urban renewal movement has been initiated in Turkey with the aim of renewing 8 million dwellings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With a questionnaire survey applied to 323 experts, the importance of these elements in terms of economic, environmental and social sustainability dimensions were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is evaluated that the results will lead to the stakeholders of urban renewal in the direction of creating livable cities
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A major urban renewal movement has been initiated in Turkey with the aim of renewing 8 million dwellings. In this study, the relationship between the built environment design and the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability has been examined. The elements of built environment design were identified with a comprehensive literature study. With a questionnaire survey applied to 323 experts, the importance of these elements in terms of economic, environmental and social sustainability dimensions were determined. How the relation emerged with sustainability and the most important elements in each dimension was discussed in detail. It was also investigated, whether there were significant differences between assessments according to different characteristics of the participants. It is evaluated that the results will lead to the stakeholders of urban renewal in the direction of creating livable cities

Özet

Türkiye'de sekiz milyon konutun yenilenmesini hedefleyen büyük bir kentsel dönüşüm hareketi başlatılmıştır. Kentsel sorunlara kalıcı çözümler üretilebilmesi için bütüncül bir sürdürülebilirlik anlayışından yola çıkılması gerektiğinden hareketle, bu çalışmada kentsel dönüşümde yapılı çevre tasarımı ile sürdürülebilirlik ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Bir kentsel dönüşüm projesinde uygulanabilecek tasarım unsurları belirlenmiş, bu unsurların sürdürülebilirliğin ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal boyutları açısından önemleri 323 uzmanın katılımı ile gerçekleştirilen bir anket çalışması ile değerlendirilmiştir. Her boyutta en önemli bulunan unsurlar ile sürdürülebilirlik ilişkisinin nasıl ortaya çıktığı ve katılımcıların değişik özelliklerine göre değerlendirmelerinde farklılaşma olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Sonuçların, kentsel dönüşüm paydaşlarına daha yaşanabilir kentler yaratma yolunda katkı sağlayacağı değerlendirilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, S., KIVRAK, S., ARSLAN, G. (2018). The Relationship between Built Environment Design and Sustainability in Urban Renewal. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 53–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/151011

References (13)

  1. Ataöv, A. & Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüme yöntemsel bir yaklaşım, METU Journal of The Faculty of The Architecture, (2), 57-82.
  2. Barnett, J. (1982),
  3. An Introduction to Urban Design, New York: Harper and Row Berke, P. & Manta Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans, Journal of the American Planning Ass., 66(1), 21-33.
  4. Bonacorsi, G. (1996). Significance and Development of Hyper-Centers in European Metropolitan Areas, Town Planning and Sustainable Development, Habitat II City Summit, İstanbul: 3-8
  5. Bourdeau, L. (1999). Sustainable development and the future of construction: a comparison of visions from various countries, Building Research & Information,27(6), 354-366.
  6. Boyd, H.P, Westfall, R. & Stasch, S.F. (1989), Marketing Reserach – Text and Cases, Boston, Irwin. CABE and DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2001), The value of urban design: A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. London: Thomas Telford. Colantonio, A., Dixon, T., Ganser, R., Carpenter, J. & Ngombe, A. (2009). Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford Brookes University Couch, C. ve Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain: The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership, Cities, 17(2), 137- 147. Cronbach, L. J. (1951), Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  7. Dizdaroğlu, D. ve Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). A parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: The MUSIX model, Ecological Indicators, 41, 115–130
  8. Donnison, D. (1993).
  9. Agenda for the future. McConnell, C.(ed.) Trickle down or bubble up. London: Community Development Foundation. Elander, I. (1995). Policy networks and housing regeneration in England and Sweden, Urban Studies, 32(6), 913-934. European Commission, (1996).
  10. European Sustainable Cities, Report by the Expert Group on the Urban Environment, Italy. Gilbert, R., Stevenson, D., Girardet, H. & Stren, R. (1996).
  11. Making Cities Work, London: Earthscan. Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research, Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907.
  12. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, İstanbul:
  13. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Haştemoğlu, H.İ. (2006). 19