Journals / Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) / 2010 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Proksimal humerus kırıklarında AO gergi bandı tekniği uygulaması

AO tension band technique application in proximal humerus fractures

Pages
62–67
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This procedure is simple to perform and provides good postoperative results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to report our functional results after an intramedullary Kirschner wires (K-wires) and tension band wiring combination for the treatment of a large group of humeral head fractures was performed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: Seventy-four patients (54 females, 20 males; mean age 42 years; range 24 to 73 years) who had proximal humerus fractures were treated with an intramedullary K-wire and tension band technique and were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This procedure is simple to perform and provides good postoperative results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to report our functional results after an intramedullary Kirschner wires (K-wires) and tension band wiring combination for the treatment of a large group of humeral head fractures was performed. Patients and methods: Seventy-four patients (54 females, 20 males; mean age 42 years; range 24 to 73 years) who had proximal humerus fractures were treated with an intramedullary K-wire and tension band technique and were retrospectively analyzed. Fracture patterns were according to Neer classification type II in 43 patients, type III in 23 patients and type IV in five patients. The Constant-Murley shoulder score test was used to evaluate the function of both shoulders. The outcome was graded according to Neer’s criteria. The pain score was determined with a 10-point visual analog scale. Results: All fractures were healed (radiologically and clinically) within 3.6 months (range 2.5 to 4.7 months) after the surgery. In one patient, the cerclage wire was broken and in eight patients, K-wires produced impingement like symptoms that required a second procedure (wire removal) after healing. The results of the patients with regard to Constant-Murley score and Neer criteria were indifferent when the 6th and the 12th month data were compared (p0.05). Conclusion: The type of fixation depends on the bone quality and the degree of comminution. But the recent trend is towards osteosynthesis -the limited, less invasive technique- which is performed with minimal soft tissue dissection and minimal osteosynthesis. It allows less stripping of bone and therefore preservation of the blood supply to the humeral head. This procedure is simple to perform and provides good postoperative results.

Özet

Amaç: Bu geniş katılımlı çalışmada humerus başı kırıklarında intramedüller Kirschner teli (K-teli) ve gergi bandı kombinasyonu uygulanan hastaların fonksiyonel tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Proksimal humerus kırığı nedeni ile intramedüller K-teli ve gergi bandı tekniği uygulanarak tedavi edilen 74 hasta (54 kadın, 20 erkek; ort. yaş 42 yıl; dağılım 24-73 yıl) geriye yönelik olarak değerlendirildi. Neer sınıflamasına göre değerlendirilen kırıkların 43’ü tip II, 23’ü tip III, beşi ise tip IV idi. Her iki omuza da Constant-Murley omuz skorlaması uygulanarak sonuçlar değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar Neer kriterlerine göre derecelendirildi. Ağrı, 10 puan üzerinden görsel analog skala ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Tüm kırıklar (radyolojik ve klinik olarak) ameliyat sonrası ortalama 3.6 ayda (dağılım 2.5-4.7 ay) kaynadı. Bir hastada serklaj teli kırıldı, sekiz hastada ise intramedüller K-teli, kaynamadan sonra ikinci bir işlem gerektiren impingement sendromuna neden oldu. Sonuçlar 6. ve 12. aylarda Constant-Murley skoru ve Neer kriterlerine göre değerlendirildiğinde aralarında fark saptanmadı (p0.05). Sonuç: Yapılan tespitin tipi, kemiğin kalitesi ve kırığın çok parçalı olup olmamasına bağlı olarak değişir. Ancak son zamanlarda güncel olan yaklaşım, minimal yumuşak doku diseksiyonu ile birlikte yapılan -sınırlı ve daha az invazif bir teknik olan- açık osteosentezdir. Bu sayede kemiğin daha az sıyrılması ve humerus başının beslenmesinin korunması hedeflenir. Bu yöntemin basit, kullanışlı ve ameliyat sonrası iyi sonuçlar veren bir yöntem olduğu görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞBOZKURT, M., BAYKAL, B., KÖMÜRCÜ, M., ŞEHİRLİOĞLU, A., YILDIZ, C., KÜRKLÜ, M., YURTTAŞ, Y., ÖZKAN, H., BİLGİÇ, S. (2022). Proksimal humerus kırıklarında AO gergi bandı tekniği uygulaması. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 62–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/498724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 1996;18(3 Suppl):209S-213S
  2. Wong KL, Williams GR. Proximal humeral fractures: diagnosis and management. Orthop J 1998;11:1-11
  3. Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N. Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults-a systematic review of management. Injury 2001;32:363-72
  4. Dines DM, Tuckman D, Dines J. Hemiarthroplasty for complex four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: technical considerations and surgical technique. Univ Penn Orthop J 2002;15:29-36
  5. Hessmann MH, Blum J, Hofmann A, Küchle R, Rommens PM. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: current concepts. Eur J Trauma 2003;29:253-61
  6. Khodadadyan-Klosterman C, Raschke M, Steenlage E, von Seebach M, Melcher I, Haas N. Intramedullary wiring of proximal humerus fractures. Results of a minimally invasive treatment concept. Eur J Trauma 2002;28:234-41 7. Raissadat K, Struben PJ, van Loon CJ. Helix wire osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: unacceptable nonunion rate in two- and three-part fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:166-8
  7. Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1919-25
  8. Chen CY, Chao EK, Tu YK, Ueng SW, Shih CH. Closed management and percutaneous fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures. J Trauma 1998;45:1039-45
  9. Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R, Wambacher M. Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79:295-300
  10. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1970;52:1077-89
  11. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:160-4
  12. Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1982;64:319-37
  13. Cornell CN. Tension-band wiring supplemented by lag-screw fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a modified technique. Orthop Rev 1994;Suppl:19-23
  14. Cornell CN, Levine D, Pagnani MJ. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the screw-tension band technique. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:23-7
  15. Kitson J, Booth G, Day R. A biomechanical comparison of locking plate and locking nail implants used for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Su