Journals / Journal of Innovative Transportation / 2025 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Improving physical and mechanical performance of expansive clayey road subgrade with sodium hydroxide

Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test results indicated that liquid limit (LL), plasticity index (PI) and swelling potential of the soil decreased steadily with increasing molar concentrations of NaOH solution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Expansive clay subgrades are problematic soils encountered in road construction and should be treated appropriately.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of NaOH with different molarities (8M, 12M and 15M) on the properties of expansive subgrade was evaluated by performing consistency, free swell, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests at three different curing durations of 1, 7 and 28 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test results indicated that liquid limit (LL), plasticity index (PI) and swelling potential of the soil decreased steadily with increasing molar concentrations of NaOH solution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Expansive subgrade · Stabilization · NaOH

Abstract

Expansive clay subgrades are problematic soils encountered in road construction and should be treated appropriately. In this study, the stabilization of the expansive subgrade with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was investigated. The effect of NaOH with different molarities (8M, 12M and 15M) on the properties of expansive subgrade was evaluated by performing consistency, free swell, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests at three different curing durations of 1, 7 and 28 days. The test results indicated that liquid limit (LL), plasticity index (PI) and swelling potential of the soil decreased steadily with increasing molar concentrations of NaOH solution. The soil's maximum dry density (MDD) and the optimum moisture content (OMC) increased consistently with the NaOH solution. An approximately 150% and 285% increase in the UCS and CBR values of the pure soil after 28 days of curing was achieved with a 15 M NaOH solution. The present study has yielded encouraging results with regard to the sustainability of stabilizing expansive clayey subgrades through the use of NaOH.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tanyıldızı, M. (2025). Improving physical and mechanical performance of expansive clayey road subgrade with sodium hydroxide. Journal of Innovative Transportation, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.53635/jit.1665613

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Zimar, Z., Robert, D., Zhou, A., Giustozzi, F., Setunge, S., & Kodikara, J. (2022). Application of coal fly ash in pavement subgrade stabilisation: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 312, 114926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114926
  2. Daud, N. N., Jalil, F. N. A., Çelik, S., & Albayrak, Z. N. K. (2019, April). The important aspects of subgrade stabilization for road construction. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering (Vol. 512, No. 1, p. 012005). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012005
  3. Xiao, J., Shen, J., Bai, M., Gao, Q., & Wu, Y. (2021). Reuse of construction spoil in China: Current status and future opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125742
  4. Nadeem, M., Ullah, S., Khan, M. A., Chen, S., Q. Alkahtani, M., Mursaleen, M., Salih, R., Ali, D., Jian, L., Ahmad, J. & Islam, S. (2024). Performance Evaluation and Microstructural Assessment of Industrial Solid Waste as Sustainable Additives for Expansive Soil. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024(1), 2397249. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2397249
  5. Çimen, Ö., Saltan, M., & Keskin, S. N. (2015). Stabilization of clayey subgrade with waste pumice for road infrastructure. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 22(5), 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2013-0315
  6. Tanyıldızı, M., Uz, V. E., & Gökalp, İ. (2023). Utilization of waste materials in the stabilization of expansive pavement subgrade: An extensive review. Construction and Building Materials, 398, 132435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132435
  7. Sahoo, S., & Singh, S. P. (2022). Strength and durability properties of expansive soil treated with geopolymer and conventional stabilizers. Construction and Building Materials, 328, 127078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127078
  8. Jalal, F. E., Xu, Y., Jamhiri, B., & Memon, S. A. (2020). On the Recent Trends in Expansive Soil Stabilization Using Calcium‐Based Stabilizer Materials (CSMs): A Comprehensive Review. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020(1), 1510969. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1510969
  9. Abden, A., Al-Shamrani, M., & Dafalla, M. (2024). Evaluating the feasibility of inverted T foundation on expansive soils. Journal of Building Engineering, 97, 110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110788
  10. Barman, D., & Dash, S. K. (2022). Stabilization of expansive soils using chemical additives: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(4), 1319-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011
  11. Hussain, S. (2019). Stabilization of Expansive Soil Using Sodium Hydroxide (Master’s Thesis), Near East University.
  12. Abdulkarim, I. I., & Sa’eed, Y. U. (2020). Performance Evaluation of the Effect of Sodium Hydroxide on Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soil for Rural Road Construction. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 213-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v5i2.479
  13. ASTM D422-63. (2007). Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils.
  14. ASTM D854. (1999). Standard test method for specific gravity of soils.
  15. ASTM D4318. (2018). Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.
  16. ASTM D2487-17. (2020). Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).
  17. AASHTO M 145. (1995). Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes.
  18. BS 1377. (1990). Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes.
  19. ASTM D4546. (2014). Standard test methods for one-dimensional swell or collapse of soils.
  20. ASTM D1557. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).
  21. ASTM D2166. (2006). Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil.
  22. ASTM D1883. (2007). Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils.
  23. Samantasinghar, S., & Singh, S. P. (2018). Effect of synthesis parameters on compressive strength of fly ash-slag blended geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 170, 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.026
  24. Paulose, S., Reddy, P. H. P., & Jayakumar, K. V. (2014, December). Swell potential studies on soils contaminated with NaOH solutions. In Indian Geotechnical Conference IGC, Kanikada, India (pp. 1362-1369).
  25. Odeh, N. A., & Al-Rkaby, A. H. (2022). Strength, Durability, and Microstructures characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved clayey soil. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00988
  26. Mukherjee, S., & Ghosh, P. (2021). Soil behavior and characterization: effect of improvement in CBR characteristics of soil subgrade on design of bituminous pavements. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 51(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00533-8
  27. Head, K.H. (1982). Manual of soil laboratory testing, 2, Pentech Press, ISBN 0-7273-1305-3.