Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Gender and urban space: An examination of a small Anatolian city

Pages
153–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that male users dominate the city center at all times while the density of women users is much lower, and is even lower than that of teenagers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public spaces can be defned as places of interaction, social encounter and exchange where groups with different interests converge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A major contribution of this study is the fnding that there is a discrepancy between the most integrated streets in terms of visibility and the most densely used ones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that male users dominate the city center at all times while the density of women users is much lower, and is even lower than that of teenagers.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Public spaces can be defned as places of interaction, social encounter and exchange where groups with different interests converge. Accessible and open to everyone, they are designed for a variety of uses where people can participate in public life. They also contribute to the collective identity of the community as they represent the culture and values of its users. In recent decades, the different ways in which public spaces are used have been the subject of studies from different disciplines including but not limited to anthropology, geography, sociology, architecture, and urban planning. It has been argued that the way in which urban life is lived and experienced changes according to demographics of its users such as age, sex, and social class. In this study, the use of public spaces based on gender differences is analyzed using space syntax methodology. The context of the study is the city center of a small Anatolian town, Balıkesir, which is located in western Turkey. The methodology of the study includes a visibility analysis of the historic city center and pedestrian movement observations on the selected locations within this center. The results indicate that male users dominate the city center at all times while the density of women users is much lower, and is even lower than that of teenagers. A major contribution of this study is the fnding that there is a discrepancy between the most integrated streets in terms of visibility and the most densely used ones. Given that the users of this small Anatolian town are mostly its residents, this fnding suggests that for route-choice decisions,pedestrians utilize prior knowledge and experience of the city center more than the visual information provided to them via the geometry of the space.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEY, Y. İ. (2014). Gender and urban space: An examination of a small Anatolian city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 153–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/150899

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alkan, A. (2005) Yerel Yönetimler ve Cinsiyet: Kadınların Kentte Görünmez Varlığı, Dipnot Yayınları, Ankara (in Turkish). Batty, M. (2001) Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology, Environment and Planning, B: Planning and Design, Vol.28: 123-150.
  2. Beauvoir, S. (1993) İkinci Cins (trans. B. Onaran), Payel Yayınevi, İstanbul (in Turkish). Benedikt, M. (1979) To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol.6: 47-65.
  3. Conroy Dalton, R. (2003) The Secret is to Follow Your Nose: Route Path Selection and Angularity, Environment and Behavior, Vol.35, No.1: 107-131.
  4. Çakır, S. (2008) Osmanlı’da Kadınların Mekanı, Sınırlar ve İhalaller, in A. Alkan (ed.), Cins Cins Mekan, VarlıkYayınları, İstanbul, pp.76-101 (in Turkish). Çelik, Z. (1999) New Approaches to the Non-Western City, Journal of Society of Architectural Historians, Vol.58, No.3: 374-381.
  5. Deutsch, S. (2000) Women and the City: Gender Space and Power in Boston, 1870-1940,
  6. Oxford University Press,
  7. New York. Farah, E. A., and B. Klarqvist (2001) Gender Zones in the Arab Muslim Houses,, in J. Peponis, J. Wineman and S. Bafna (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA, pp.42.1-42.15. Garcia-Ramon, M.D., A. Ortiz, and M. Prats (2004)
  8. Urban Planning, Gender and the Use of Public Space in a Peripheral Neighborhood of Barcelona, Cities, Vol.21, No.3: 215-223.
  9. Guney, Y.I., A. S. Kubat, O.Ozer, and H. Uçar, (2009) A Syntactic Analysis of Recent Changes in CBD of Balikesir, Turkey, in D. Koch, L. Marcus and J. Steen (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. Güney, Y.I. (2008) Konutta Mekansal Organizasyon ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet: YirminciYüzyıl Ankara Apartmanları, in A. Alkan (ed.), Cins Cins Mekan, Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul, pp.102-135 (in Turkish). Güney, Y. I., and H. Uçar (2007) Küreselleşmeve Arada Kalan Kentler: Balıkesir Örneği, paper presented at the IAPS Conference, Istanbul. Guney, Y. I. (2007) Analyzing Visibility Structures in Turkish Domestic Spaces,, in A.S. Kubat, Y. Guney, O. Ertekin and E. Eyuboglu (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. Hanson, J. (1998)
  10. Decoding Homes and Houses, Cambridge University Press, Cam