Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study

Ayşe Uçak(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5577-8635
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies are needed to develop interventions that increase team awareness and empower nurses in this area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Existing studies have not adequately explored the professional identity of operating room nurses and their perceived value within the surgical team, particularly through a metaphorical approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 69 participants selected through purposive sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies are needed to develop interventions that increase team awareness and empower nurses in this area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Operating room nursing · perioperative nursing · operating rooms

Abstract

Aims: Existing studies have not adequately explored the professional identity of operating room nurses and their perceived value within the surgical team, particularly through a metaphorical approach. This study examined surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurse through metaphor analysis. Methods: This qualitative study examined surgical team members’ perceptions of operating room nurses in Turkiye with at least six months of experience through metaphors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 69 participants selected through purposive sampling. Participants were asked to generate a metaphor to describe operating room nurses and explain their rationale. Results: Participants generated 32 valid metaphors, grouped into four conceptual categories; ‘team leader,’ ‘supporter and assistant,’ ‘family member,’ and ‘patient advocate.’ The most frequent metaphors were found in the ‘team leader’ and ‘supporter/helper’ categories. The findings reflect the essential and multifaceted functions of the operating room nurse and demonstrate that surgical teams have a multidimensional perception of operating room nurses, spanning ‘invisible support,’ ‘silent leadership,’ and ‘patient advocacy.’ Conclusion: Operating room nurses are perceived within the surgical team for their technical skills and for their critical roles in leadership, coordination, and patient advocacy. Surgeons’ and nurses’ perceptions differed, rooted in professional and hierarchical dynamics. Increasing visibility of nurses’ leadership and advocacy roles and supporting shared leadership within the team are crucial to ensuring safer, more effective surgical care. Further studies are needed to develop interventions that increase team awareness and empower nurses in this area.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uçak, A., Cebeci, F. (2026). Surgical team members’ perceptions of the operating room nurses: a metaphor study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1954776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Luo J. Facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses and other practitioners: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2026;16(4):e098386. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098386
  2. Pasquer A, Ducarroz S, Lifante JC, Skinner S, Poncet G, Duclos A. Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18(1):5. doi:10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3
  3. European Operating Room Nurses Association. EORNA Common Core Curriculum for Perioperative Nursing. 20th ed. European Operating Room Nurses Association; 2019.
  4. Antoniadou I, Björling G, Härenstam KP, Meijer S, Mattsson J. Operating room nurses’ perceptions of teamwork and learning in the operating room: a qualitative study. J Patient Saf Risk Manag. Published online February 10, 2026. doi:10.1177/25160435261421337
  5. Aktaş E, Atmaca HE, Akbulut HE. Operating room and surgical team members scheduling: a comprehensive review. J Proj Manag. 2024;9(2): 149-162. doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2023.12.001
  6. Liu G, Qi H, Hou F, Qi K, Luan X. The impact of professional mission on turnover intention among operating room nurses: a chain mediation model analysis of professional identity and job burnout. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):286. doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02606-2
  7. Aouicha W, Tlili MA, Limam M, et al. Evaluation of the impact of intraoperative distractions on teamwork, stress, and workload. J Surg Res. 2021;259:465-472. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.006
  8. Kanburoglu C, Sezer B. Medical student learning in the operating room: a qualitative study from the perspectives of students and the OR team. BMC Med Educ. 2026;26(1):227. doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08596-y
  9. Yıldırım D, Sırma S, Uzell D, Akın E. Ethics through metaphors: a qualitative inquiry into nursing students’ perceptions. J Educ Res Nurs. 2026;23(1):61-66. doi:10.14744/jern.2025.74152
  10. Turan FD, Söyünmez S. Perceptions of third- and fourth-year nursing students enrolled in a pediatric nursing course regarding the concept of child abuse: a metaphorical study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;113:105359. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022. 105359
  11. Gibbs RW Jr, Colston HL. Pragmatics always matters: an expanded vision of experimental pragmatics. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1619. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619
  12. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  13. Tight M. Saturation: an overworked and misunderstood concept? Qual Inq. 2024;30(7):577-583. doi:10.1177/10778004231183948
  14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2016.
  15. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press; 2003.
  16. Trainor A, Graue E. Reviewing Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences. Routledge; 2013.
  17. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 1994.
  18. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2003;8(4):597-607.
  19. Buetow S. Apophenia, unconscious bias and reflexivity in nursing qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;89:8-13. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.013
  20. Reato F, Ivziku D, Lommi M, et al. Transversal competencies in operating room nurses: a hierarchical task analysis. Nurs Rep. 2025;15(6):200. doi:10.3390/nursrep15060200
  21. Hara K, Tachibana R, Kumashiro R, Inoue T. Lasting impact of undergraduate operating room shadowing on novice nurses: a ChatGPT-supported qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2025;24(1):1151. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03770-x
  22. Sillero AS, Buil N. Enhancing interprofessional collaboration in perioperative setting from the qualitative perspectives of physicians and nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10775. doi:10.3390/ijerph182010775
  23. Meyers A, Daysalilar M, Dagal A, Wang M, Kutlu O, Akcin M. Quantifying the impact of surgical teams on each stage of the operating room process. Front Digit Health. 2024;6:1455477. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1455477
  24. Saban A. Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teach Teach Educ. 2010;26(2):290-305. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017
  25. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  26. Chellam Singh B, Arulappan J. Operating room nurses’ understanding of their roles and responsibilities for patient care and safety measures in intraoperative practice. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023;9:23779608231186250. doi:10.1177/23779608231186247
  27. An JH, Yeun EJ, Lee SH, Kim HY. Perceptions of nurse-surgeon communication in the operating room: a Q-methodology study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025;22(2):229. doi:10.3390/ijerph22020229
  28. Yeganeh S, Torabizadeh C, Bahmani T, Molazem Z, Doust HY, Dehnavi SD. Examining the views of operating room nurses and physicians on the relationship between professional values and professional communication. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):17. doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00778-x
  29. Lee H, Woodward-Kron R, Merry A, Weller J. Emotions and team communication in the operating room: a scoping review. Med Educ Online. 2023;28(1):2194508. doi:10.1080/10872981.2023.2194508
  30. Nyberg A, Jirwe M, Fagerdahl A, Otten V, Haney M, Olofsson B. Perioperative patient safety indicators: a Delphi study. J Clin Nurs. 2025;34(4):1351-1363. doi:10.1111/jocn.17212
  31. McElroy C, Skegg E, Mudgway M, et al. Psychological safety and hierarchy in operating room debriefing: reflexive thematic analysis. J Surg Res. 2024;295:567-573. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.054
  32. Kulaksızoğlu H, Taylan S, Eti-Aslan F. Mapping the nursing literature on patient safety in the operating room: a bibliometric analysis. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2025; 38:100455. doi:10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100455
  33. Geoghan Marold SM, Strouse SM, Butcher D. Professional identity in nursing: a narrative review of the ISPIN definition and domains usage. SAGE Open Nurs. 2025;11: 23779608251335240. doi:10.1177/23779608251335240
  34. Etherington C, Kitto S, Burns JK, et al. How gender shapes interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: a qualitative secondary analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1357. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07403-2