Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 6

Surgical patients’ perceptions of the care provided by nursing students: a convergent parallel mixed methods study

Ayşe Uçak(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5577-8635
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Surgical patients rated the care provided by nursing students positively overall (Patient Perception of Nursing Student Care Scale score: 4.05±0.37).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To examine surgical patients’ perceptions of the care provided by nursing students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design and was conducted in the surgical units of a public hospital in Turkiye between March and May 2026.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Surgical patients rated the care provided by nursing students positively overall (Patient Perception of Nursing Student Care Scale score: 4.05±0.37).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2026 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Surgical patients · nursing students · patient perceptions

Abstract

Aims: To examine surgical patients’ perceptions of the care provided by nursing students. Methods: This study employed a convergent parallel mixed methods design and was conducted in the surgical units of a public hospital in Turkiye between March and May 2026. The quantitative phase included 118 patients, while the qualitative phase involved 19 patients selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using the Patient Perception of Nursing Student Care Scale and semi-structured individual interviews. Analysis included descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and inductive content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated using a joint display. Findings were reported in accordance with the STROBE, COREQ, and GRAMMS guidelines. Results: Surgical patients rated the care provided by nursing students positively overall (Patient Perception of Nursing Student Care Scale score: 4.05±0.37). Among the subscales, professionalism received the highest mean score (4.11±0.42), whereas knowledge and skills received the lowest (3.94±0.60). Qualitative analysis generated four themes. Patients valued students’ attitudes, communication, and approach, but closer clinical supervision was suggested for invasive procedures, patient education, and discharge planning. Patients perceived nursing students as future nurses and expressed willingness to contribute to their learning. The qualitative findings complemented and expanded the quantitative results by explaining the comparatively lower knowledge and skills ratings through patients’ concerns about invasive procedures and their preference for clinical supervision, and by highlighting patient education and discharge counseling as areas requiring improvement. Conclusion: Surgical patients generally perceived the care provided by nursing students positively. Professional attitudes and communication skills emerged as key strengths, whereas closer clinical supervision and additional support were particularly needed during invasive procedures, patient education, and discharge planning. These findings highlight the value of patient feedback in informing nursing students’ clinical education and supporting the delivery of person-centered care.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çatal, A. T., Uçak, A. (2026). Surgical patients’ perceptions of the care provided by nursing students: a convergent parallel mixed methods study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Holst H, Ozolins LL, Brunt D, Hörberg U. The perspectives of patients, nursing students and supervisors on “the caring-learning space”: a synthesis of and further abstracton of previous studies. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023;18(1):2172796. doi:10.1080/17482631.2023.2172796
  2. Sakallı GD, Dag GS, Payas SC, Tasargöl Ö. Evaluation of nursing students’ clinical practices: from a patient’s perspective. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:1680. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08246-9
  3. Alberti S, Ferri P, Ghirotto L, et al. The patient involvement in nursing education: a mixed-methods systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;128:105875. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105875
  4. Aupia A, Lee TT, Liu CY, Wu SFV, Mills ME. Caring behavior perceived by nurses, patients and nursing students in Indonesia. J Prof Nurs. 2018;34(4):314-319. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.013
  5. Bardaie N, Holt J, McHugh GA. Perceptions of caring behaviors among patients, nurses, nursing students: a qualitative exploratory descriptive study. BMC Nurs. 2026;25:236. doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04139-w
  6. Özşaker E, Sevilmiş H, Özcan Y, Samast M. Nursing care perception and satisfaction levels of surgical patients. J Contemp Med. 2021;11(2):151-159. doi:10.16899/jcm.711131
  7. Manninen K, Henriksson EW, Scheja M, Silén C. Patients’ approaches to students’ learning at a clinical education ward: an ethnographic study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:131. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-131
  8. Suikkala A, Koskinen S, Katajisto J, Leino-Kilpi H. Congruence between nursing students’ and patients’ views of student-patient relationships. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(1):79-115. doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09972-z
  9. Suikkala A, Timonen L, Leino-Kilpi H, Katajisto J, Strandell-Laine C. Healthcare student-patient relationship and the quality of the clinical learning environment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):230. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02676-x
  10. Karatana Ö, Öztürk Yıldırım T. Hastaların hemşirelik öğrencilerine yönelik Bakım Algısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. SBÜ Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2023;5(3):213-218. doi:10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.1258828
  11. Balasa R, Chartrand J, Moreau K, Tousignant K, Eady K. Patients’ and parents’ perspectives of and experiences with assessing nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(1-2):217-228. doi:10.1111/jocn.15544
  12. Ulupınar F, Karasu Ş. Perceived vs. experienced care: a comparison between nursing students’ self-assessed competence and patients’ reported care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:733. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12880-w
  13. Delli Poggi A, Pintus G, Dionisi S, et al. Impact of nursing students on the quality of care perceived by patients: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25(6):2711-2725. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202103_25434
  14. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.
  15. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
  16. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed. Pearson; 2019.
  17. Daher W. Saturation in qualitative educational technology research. Educ Sci. 2023;13(2):98. doi:10.3390/educsci13020098
  18. Jagoda ET, Edirisinghe EAKK, Meegoda MKDL. Evaluation of service quality in nursing and patient satisfaction: perception of patients and student nurses. Proc Glob Public Health Conf. 2019;2(1):37-51. doi:10.17501/26138417.2019.2105
  19. DeVellis RF, Thorpe CT. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 5th ed. SAGE Publications; 2021.
  20. Alberti S, Díaz Crescitelli ME, Bonetti L, Rovesti S, Ferri P. Enhancing nursing students’ patient-centeredness attitudes and emotional skills through co-teaching with patients and caregivers: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2025;20(9):e0332510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332510
  21. Fetters MD, Molina-Azorin JF. The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: the mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. J Mix Methods Res. 2017;11(3):291-307. doi:10.1177/1558689817714066
  22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  23. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2003;8(4):597-606. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
  24. Buetow S. Apophenia, unconscious bias and reflexivity in nursing qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;89:8-13. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.013
  25. Sarıköse S, Özkan A, Cengiz A, et al. The opinions and experiences of nursing students, nurses, and patients regarding clinical practices: a mixed-methods study. Nurs Health Sci. 2024;26(3):e13145. doi:10.1111/nhs.13145