Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Radiology residents' perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Turkiye: knowledge, attitudes, and educational expectations

Abdullah Enes Ataş(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MERAM TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6623-3024
Seyit Erol(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0547-872X
Hasan Emin Kaya(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7411-4102
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings suggest that AI literacy and ethical principles should be urgently integrated as a mandatory module in the core radiology curriculum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aims to assess the knowledge levels, attitudes, and professional concerns of radiology residents in Turkiye regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in medical imaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted with 90 radiology residents from various teaching and university hospitals in Turkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings suggest that AI literacy and ethical principles should be urgently integrated as a mandatory module in the core radiology curriculum.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence · radiology education · radiology residents

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to assess the knowledge levels, attitudes, and professional concerns of radiology residents in Turkiye regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in medical imaging. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted with 90 radiology residents from various teaching and university hospitals in Turkiye. Data were collected using a structured online questionnaire that evaluated demographics, self-reported AI knowledge, attitudes toward AI integration (using a Likert scale), and educational expectations. Results: The study revealed that 95.6% of residents had received no formal AI training during their residency. Although 56.7% claimed “basic knowledge” of AI, 70% were unfamiliar with the concept of “algorithmic bias”. Participants viewed AI primarily as a “copilot” (mean score 4.27/5) rather than a threat. While 60% rejected the idea that AI would completely replace radiologists, 77.8% agreed with the statement that “radiologists who use AI will replace those who do not”. Furthermore, 92.2% of participants expressed a desire for specific AI training. Conclusion: Radiology residents demonstrate a highly enthusiastic and pragmatic attitude toward AI integration; however, a significant gap exists between their perceived competence and actual conceptual literacy. These findings suggest that AI literacy and ethical principles should be urgently integrated as a mandatory module in the core radiology curriculum.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ataş, A. E., Erol, S., Kaya, H. E. (2026). Radiology residents' perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Turkiye: knowledge, attitudes, and educational expectations. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1904589

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Windecker D, Baj G, Shiri I, et al. Generalizability of FDA-approved AI-enabled medical devices for clinical use. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(4):e258052. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8052
  2. Zanardo M, Visser JJ, Colarieti A, et al. Impact of AI on radiology: a EuroAIM/EuSoMII 2024 survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):240. doi:10.1186/s13244-024-01801-w
  3. Chen Y, Wu Z, Wang P, et al. Radiology residents’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: nationwide cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e48249. doi:10.2196/48249
  4. Banerjee I, Bhattacharjee K, Burns JL, et al. “Shortcuts” causing bias in radiology Artificial Intelligence: causes, evaluation, and mitigation. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20(9):842-851. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.025
  5. Bozer A, Pekçevik Y. Comparative evaluation of large language models in explaining radiology reports: expert assessment of readability, understandability, and communication features. Insights Imaging. 2025;16(1):232. doi:10.1186/s13244-025-02121-3
  6. Koç A, Ataş AE, Yosunkaya Ş, Vatansev H. Performance of large language models on sleep medicine certification examination: a comprehensive multi-model analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026;13:1761025. doi:10. 3389/fmed.2026.1761025
  7. Akinci D’Antonoli T, Bluethgen C, Cuocolo R, Klontzas ME, Ponsiglione A, Kocak B. Foundation models for radiology: fundamentals, applications, opportunities, challenges, risks, and prospects. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2026;32(3):259-272. doi:10.4274/dir.2025.253445
  8. Dicle O, Atak F, Şenol AU, et al. Turkish Society of Radiology Artificial Intelligence applications guide: a roadmap to help navigate the Artificial Intelligence landscape. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025. doi:10.4274/dir.2025. 253489
  9. Emekli E, Coşkun Ö, Budakoğlu I. The role of Artificial Intelligence in radiology residency training: a national survey study. Eur J Ther. 2024;30:6. doi:10.58600/eurjther2344
  10. Swed S, Alibrahim H, Elkalagi NKH, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Artificial Intelligence among doctors and medical students in Syria: a cross-sectional online survey. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1011524. doi:10.3389/frai.2022.1011524
  11. Huisman M, Ranschaert E, Parker W, et al. An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(9):7058-7066. doi:10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5
  12. Keser G, Namdar Pekiner FM. Attitudes, perceptions and knowledge regarding the future of Artificial Intelligence in oral radiology among a group of dental students in Turkey: a survey. Clin Exp Heal Sci. 2021;11(4):637-641. doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.928246
  13. Bin Dahmash A, Alabdulkareem M, Alfutais A, et al. Artificial Intelligence in radiology: does it impact medical students preference for radiology as their future career? BJR Open. 2020;2(1):20200037. doi:10. 1259/bjro.20200037
  14. Güzel HE, Bozer A. Artificial Intelligence adoption and perspectives among Turkish radiologists: a national survey. IJ Radiol. 2025;22(3):e165130. doi:10.5812/iranjradiol-165130
  15. Lastrucci A, Iosca N, Wandael Y, et al. AI and Interventional radiology: a narrative review of reviews on opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;15(7):893. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15070893
  16. Kitamura F, Kline T, Warren D, et al. Teaching AI for radiology applications: a multisociety‑recommended syllabus from the AAPM, ACR, RSNA, and SIIM. Med Phys. 2025;52(10):e17779. doi:10.1002/mp.17779