SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Energy Systems / 2026 / Volume: 3 Issue: 3

The calculation of greenhouse gas emissions of a family and projections for emission reduction

Mehmet Mustafa Yatarkalkmaz(Turkish Standards Institution)0000-0002-0321-144X
Mustafa Bahadır Özdemir(Gazı University)0000-0001-7801-9367
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is thought that the study will guide the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions and will also help those who wish to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article shows how to calculate greenhouse gas emissions of a family and emission reduction activities according to IPCC documents and ISO 14064-1 standards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, direct and energy indirect emissions in 2017 are calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that the study will guide the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions and will also help those who wish to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission · ISO 14064-1 · Emission reduction strategies

Abstract

The article shows how to calculate greenhouse gas emissions of a family and emission reduction activities according to IPCC documents and ISO 14064-1 standards. In this study, direct and energy indirect emissions in 2017 are calculated. Then, within the scope of emission reduction activities, PV system installation, boiler exchange and led conversion are projected. As a result of the calculations, the total emission of the family is found to be 5,331 tons CO 2 -Eq. 84.1% of the total emission is direct emissions that is 4,484 tons CO 2 -Eq. The remaining 15.9% is energy indirect emission that is 0,847 tons CO 2 -Eq. Besides, 0,407 tons CO 2 -Eq from direct emission and 0,464 tons CO 2 -Eq from energy indirect emission are reduced. With the help of simple projections, we can reduce direct emissions by approximately 8%, while energy indirect emissions by about 55%. It is thought that the study will guide the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions and will also help those who wish to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yatarkalkmaz, M. M., Özdemir, M. B. (2019). The calculation of greenhouse gas emissions of a family and projections for emission reduction. Journal of Energy Systems, Volume: 3 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.566516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Serengil, Y. Küresel Isınma ve Olası Ekolojik Sonuçları [Global Warming and Possible Ecological Consequences]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi,1995, 45(1-2), 135-152. Türkeş, M. IPCC İklim Değişikliği 2013: Fiziksel Bilim Temeli Politikacılar için Özet Raporundaki Yeni Bulgu ve Sonuçların Bilimsel Bir Değerlendirmesi [IPCC Climate Change 2013: A Scientific Assessment of New Findings and Results in the Summary Report for Political Scientists in Physical Science], İklim Değişikliğinde Son Gelişmeler: IPCC 2013 Raporu Paneli Bildiriler Kitapçığı, İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi, Sabancı Üniversitesi, İstanbul,2013, 8-18.
  2. Davarcıoğlu, B. Küresel İklim Değişikliği ve Uyum Çalışmaları: Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [Global Climate Change and Adaptation Activities: Evaluation of Turkey]. Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi,2018, 7(2). Bilgiç, E. İklim Değişikliği ile Mücadelede Emisyon Ticareti ve Türkiye Uygulaması [Emissions Trading in Combating Climate Change and Practice of Turkey], Specialist Thesis, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara,Turkey,2017, 29-48.
  3. TS EN ISO 14064-1. Greenhouse Gases-Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Turkish Standards Institution. Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
  4. TS EN ISO 14064-2. Greenhouse Gases-Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. Turkish Standards Institution. Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
  5. TS EN ISO 14064-3. Greenhouse Gases-Part 3: Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions. Turkish Standards Institution. Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
  6. Turkish Statistical Institute. Sera gazı emisyonları (milyon ton eCO2) [Greenhouse Gas Emission (Million ton CO2-Eq)]. Ankara, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1019
  7. Turkish Statistical Institute. Sera Gazı Emisyon İstatistikleri [Greenhouse Gas Emission Statistics], No 27675. Ankara, 2018. Retrieved Mayr 15, 2019, from http://tuik.gov.tr/OncekiHBArama.do
  8. UNFCCC. Republic of Turkey Intended Nationally Determined Controbution, 2015, Ankara, Turkey.
  9. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2014,2015, IEA, 1-8.
  10. Rico, A., Martínez-Blanco, J., Montlleó, M., Rodríguez, G., Tavares, N., Arias, A., Oliver-Solà, J. Carbon footprint of tourism in Barcelona. Tourism Management,2019, 70, 491-504. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.012
  11. Bastianoni, S., Marchi, M., Caro, D., Casprini, P., and Pulselli, F. M. The connection between 2006 IPCC GHG inventory methodology and ISO 14064-1 certification standard – A reference point for the environmental policies at sub-national scale. Environmental Science and Policy,2014, 44, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.015
  12. Ayalon, O., Lev-On, M., Lev-On, P., Goldrath, T. Greenhouse Gas emissions reporting in Israel: Means to manage energy use. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 85, 612-618. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.064
  13. Ponstein, H. J., Meyer-Aurich, A., Prochnow, A. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 212, 800-809. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.206
  14. Kılıç, E., Puig, R., Zengin, G., Zengin, C. A., Fullana-I-Palmer, P. Corporate carbon footprint for country Climate Change mitigation: A case study of a tannery in Turkey. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 635, 60-69. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.111
  15. Babaoğlu, N, Özgünoğlu, K. Kahramanmaraş Havalimanı İçin Uçaklardan Kaynaklanan Emisyonların Belirlenmesi [Determination of Aircraft Emissions at Kahramanmaraş Airport]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2017, 20 (3), 24-30. DOI: 10.17780/ksujes.335226
  16. Sangwan, K. S., Bhakar, V., Arora, V., Solanki, P. Measuring Carbon Footprint of an Indian University Using Life Cycle Assessment. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 69, 475-480. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.111
  17. Marchi, M., Neri, E., Pulselli, F. M., Bastianoni, S. CO2 recovery from wine production: Possible implications on the carbon balance at territorial level. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018, 28, 137-144. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.021
  18. Marchi, M., Pulselli, F. M., Mangiavacchi, S., Menghetti, F., Marchettini, N., Bastianoni, S. The greenhouse gas inventory as a tool for planning integrated waste management systems: A case study in central Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017, 142, 351-359. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.035
  19. IPCC. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), Guidelines for National Green House Gas Inventories Volume 2 Chapter 2 Stationary Combustion, IGES, Japan, 2006.
  20. Europen Commission. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System, 2017. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/tools.html
  21. Özdemir, M.B.; Yatarkalkmaz, M.M. Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis of Different Types of Collectors. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences,2015, 1 (2), 235-251.
  22. IPCC. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), Guidelines for National Green House Gas Inventories Volume 3 Chapter 7 Emission of Flourinated Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, IGES, Japan, 2006.
  23. IPCC. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), Guidelines for National Green House Gas Inventories Volume 2 Chapter 3 Mobile Combustion, IGES, Japan, 2006.
  24. IPCC. In: Stocker, T., Dahe, Q., Plattner, G.K. (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Stockholm, 2013.
  25. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company. Producer Organizations Distribution of Fuels Consumed in Thermal Power Plant Turkey (2006-2017), 2018. Retrieved December 25, 2018, from https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr/iv-turkiye-termik-santrallarinda-kullanilan-yakit-miktarlari-isil-degerleri-ve-kojenerasyon-0
  26. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company. Producer Organizations Heat Value of Distribution of Thermal Power Plant Fuel Used in Turkey (2006-2017), 2018. Retrieved December 25, 2018, from https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr/iv-turkiye-termik-santrallarinda-kullanilan-yakit-miktarlari-isil-degerleri-ve-kojenerasyon-0
  27. Turkish Electricity Transmission Company. Turkey Electricity Energy Consumption and Production Development of Annual Loss (1993- 2017), 2018. Retrieved December 25, 2018, from https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr/iii-elektrik-enerjisi-uretimi-tuketimi-kayiplar-0
  28. Serengil, Y. Küresel Isınma ve Olası Ekolojik Sonuçları [Global Warming and Possible Ecological Consequences]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi,1995, 45(1-2), 135-152.
  29. Türkeş, M. IPCC İklim Değişikliği 2013: Fiziksel Bilim Temeli Politikacılar için Özet Raporundaki Yeni Bulgu ve Sonuçların Bilimsel Bir Değerlendirmesi [IPCC Climate Change 2013: A Scientific Assessment of New Findings and Results in the Summary Report for Political Scientists in Physical Science], İklim Değişikliğinde Son Gelişmeler: IPCC 2013 Raporu Paneli Bildiriler Kitapçığı, İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi, Sabancı Üniversitesi, İstanbul,2013, 8-18.
  30. Davarcıoğlu, B. Küresel İklim Değişikliği ve Uyum Çalışmaları: Türkiye Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [Global Climate Change and Adaptation Activities: Evaluation of Turkey]. Mesleki Bilimler Dergisi,2018, 7(2).
  31. Özdemir, M.B.; Yatarkalkmaz, M.M. Energy, Exergy and Economic Analysis of Different Types of Collectors. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences,2015, 1 (2), 235-251.