Journals / Journal of Energy Systems / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Off-Design Performance and Annual Solar Contribution Assessment of a 100 MW Hybrid Solar Tower–Gas Turbine System under Libyan Desert Conditions

Abu Bakr Hammad(National School of Engineers, University of Sfax, Tunisia)0009-0006-7960-6452
Hafedh Abid(National School of Engineers, University of Sfax, Tunisia)0000-0003-3755-6259
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this paper indicate that the coupling of solar energy with gas turbine cycles by hybridization can deliver a considerable improvement in the thermodynamic performance as well as decrease fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, even without the use of thermal energy storage, under high DNI desert conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This work examines the off-design and long-term operational performance of a 100 MW hybrid solar tower–based gas turbine system under desert climatic conditions in Libya.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The solar field and receiver performance are modeled with the System Advisor Model (SAM), while a steady state Brayton cycle thermodynamic model is used to calculate the hourly hybrid operation and fuel requirements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this paper indicate that the coupling of solar energy with gas turbine cycles by hybridization can deliver a considerable improvement in the thermodynamic performance as well as decrease fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, even without the use of thermal energy storage, under high DNI desert conditions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brayton cycle · carbon emission reduction · Hybrid solar gas turbine

Abstract

This work examines the off-design and long-term operational performance of a 100 MW hybrid solar tower–based gas turbine system under desert climatic conditions in Libya. The solar field and receiver performance are modeled with the System Advisor Model (SAM), while a steady state Brayton cycle thermodynamic model is used to calculate the hourly hybrid operation and fuel requirements. At the design point, the power block produces a net electric power of approximately 109 MW with a net electrical efficiency of about 39%, thus confirming the physical consistency of the adopted thermodynamic formulation. On an annual basis, the solar receiver provides 524,602 MWh of useful heat, which is equivalent to a solar fraction of the total annual heat demand of 21.43%. The hybrid design leads to a decrease in natural gas consumption from 236.57 million m³ in the baseline case to 185.88 million m³, i.e., an annual saving in fuel of about 50.69 million m³. Using standard conversion and emission factors, the value of avoided emissions in CO₂ equivalent is about 108 thousand tons per year. An economic assessment based on the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) further indicates that the proposed hybrid configuration reduces the estimated LCOE by approximately 4.3% compared with a conventional gas turbine operating under identical conditions. The results of this paper indicate that the coupling of solar energy with gas turbine cycles by hybridization can deliver a considerable improvement in the thermodynamic performance as well as decrease fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, even without the use of thermal energy storage, under high DNI desert conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hammad, A. B., Abid, H. (2026). Off-Design Performance and Annual Solar Contribution Assessment of a 100 MW Hybrid Solar Tower–Gas Turbine System under Libyan Desert Conditions. Journal of Energy Systems, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.1921824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Almaktar M, Shaaban M. Prospects of renewable energy as a non-rivalry energy alternative in Libya. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 143: 110852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110852
  2. Ministry of Planning (Libya). National strategy for renewable energy and energy efficiency – Libya 2035. Tripoli (Libya): Ministry of Planning; 2023.
  3. Abuashe I, Shuia E, Aljermi H. Modelling and simulation of Concentrated Solar Power Plant in Ber’Alganam area (Azzawia-Libya). Solar Energy and Sustainable Development. 2019; 8(2): 17–33. https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v8i2.27
  4. Machinda GT, Chowdhury S, Arscott R, Chowdhury SP, Kibaara S. Concentrating solar thermal power technologies: A review. In: 2011 Annual IEEE India Conference; 2011 Dec 16-18; Hyderabad, India. IEEE; 2011. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDCON.2011.6139512
  5. European Commission. SOLGATE: Solar hybrid gas turbine electric power system. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2005.
  6. Heller P, Pfänder M, Denk T, Tellez F, Valverde A, Fernandez J, Ring A. Test and evaluation of a solar powered gas turbine system. Solar Energy. 2006; 80(10): 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.04.020
  7. Schwarzbözl P, Buck R, Sugarmen C, Ring A, Marcos Crespo MJ, Altwegg P, Enrile J. Solar gas turbine systems: Design, cost and perspectives. Solar Energy. 2006; 80(10): 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.09.007
  8. European Commission. SOLHYCO – Solar-Hybrid Power and Cogeneration Plants: Final Public Report (Project no. 019830). Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; 2011.
  9. Quero M, Korzynietz R, Ebert M, Jiménez A, del Río A, Brioso J. Solugas – Operation experience of the first solar hybrid gas turbine system at MW scale. Energy Procedia. 2014; 49: 1820–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.193
  10. Korzynietz R, Brioso JA, del Río A, Sánchez Quero M, Gallas MV, Uhlig R, Ebert M, Buck R, Teraji DG. Solugas - Comprehensive analysis of the solar hybrid Brayton plant. Solar Energy. 2016; 135: 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.020
  11. Ferraro V, Marinelli V, Settino J, Nicoletti F. Techno-economic analysis of a solar tower power plant with an open air Brayton cycle and a combined cycle - a simplified calculation method. International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2020; 38(3): 590–600. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.380303
  12. Hassani SE, Ouali HAL, Raillani B, Moussaoui MA, Mezrhab A, Amraqui S. Thermal performance of solar tower using air as heat transfer fluid under MENA region climate. In: 2020 5th International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries (REDEC); 2020 Jun 29-30; Marrakech, Morocco. IEEE; 2020. p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/REDEC49234.2020.9163893
  13. Belgasim B, Behar O, Abdunnabi M, Mohamed F. Modeling and simulation of a large-scale hybrid solar gas turbine with pressurized air receiver. In: 2020 11th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC); 2020 Oct 29-31; Hammamet, Tunisia. IEEE; 2020. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IREC48820.2020.9310395
  14. Ehtiwesh S, Gabbasa A, Ehtiwesh I. The potential of using the incorporation of concentrated solar power and gas turbines in the south of Libya. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2023; 26(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1293271
  15. Hassani S, Arrif T, Guermoui M, Yassaa N, Belaid A, Merchán RP, Bezza B, Taylor RA, Mekhilef S. Smart design of hybrid solar-gas turbine plants for decarbonization: A multi-criteria optimization case study in the MENA region. Solar Energy. 2025; 297: 113612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113612
  16. El-Khozondar H, Andeef M, Nassar Y, El-Khozondar R, Awad H. Feasibility of concentrating solar power as a solar fuel for electrical power stations: A case study of Ubari gas-power station in Libya. Wadi Alshatti University Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2026; 4(1): 56–69. https://doi.org/10.63318/waujpasv4i1_06
  17. Akroot A, Almaktar M, Alasali F. The integration of renewable energy into a fossil fuel power generation system in oil-producing countries: A case study of an integrated solar combined cycle at the Sarir power plant. Sustainability. 2024; 16(11): 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114820
  18. Çengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  19. Boyce MP. Axial-flow compressors. In: Gas turbine engineering handbook. 4th ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2012. p. 303–355.
  20. Wang W, Ragnolo G, Aichmayer L, Strand T, Laumert B. Integrated design of a hybrid gas turbine-receiver unit for a solar dish system. In: SolarPACES 2014: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems; 2014 Sep 16–19; Beijing, China. Energy Procedia. 2015; 69: 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.067
  21. Gas Turbine World. Gas Turbine World Handbook. Vol. 39. Fairfield (USA): Fairfield Media; 2024.
  22. Kurup P, Akar S, Glynn S, Augustine C, Davenport P. Cost update: Commercial and advanced heliostat collectors. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); 2022. Technical Report No.: NREL/TP-7A40-80482.
  23. Augustine C, Kesseli D, Turchi C. Technoeconomic cost analysis of NREL Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 liquid pathway. In: SolarPACES 2021: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems; 2021 Sep 27–Oct 1; Online. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023; 2831(1): 020001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148968
  24. International Energy Agency (IEA). Gas market report, Q2-2026. Paris: IEA Publications; 2026. Technical Report No.: IEA/GMR-2026-Q2.
  25. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable power generation costs in 2024: Techno-economic parameters for hybrid solar-gas systems. Abu Dhabi: IRENA Publications; 2025. Technical Report No.: IRENA/TR-2025-H5.
  26. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2026: Electricity Market Module. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Energy; 2026. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
  27. IPCC. Chapter 2: Stationary combustion. In: 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 2: Energy. Hayama (Japan): Institute for Global Environmental Strategies; 2006.