SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Human-AI collaboration in vocational writing: Building a framework for adaptive English learning

Şükran Türkmen Çiçek(MİLLİ SAVUNMA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KARA ASTSUBAY MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, MÜDÜRLÜK)0000-0002-5589-6524
Dilek Tüfekci Can(BALIKESIR UNIVERSITY, NECATİBEY FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0001-8067-6032
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper also highlights the importance of ethical AI implementation, data privacy, and technology availability in supporting the specialized writing skills needed for learners of English for Specific Purposes (ESP).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid technological advancements of the 21st century have substantially altered many aspects of education, including language learning and acquisition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper presents a theoretical framework that explains how AI-powered tools can be integrated into vocational language education to enhance writing proficiency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper also highlights the importance of ethical AI implementation, data privacy, and technology availability in supporting the specialized writing skills needed for learners of English for Specific Purposes (ESP).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:artificial intelligence · vocational English · writing skill

Abstract

The rapid technological advancements of the 21st century have substantially altered many aspects of education, including language learning and acquisition. Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have reshaped perspectives on language education, offering new pedagogical opportunities. Numerous studies have investigated AI-powered tools to improve language proficiency. However, these studies mainly focus on general English. There is a gap in the literature regarding the application of AI-powered approaches for teaching Vocational English, particularly in developing writing skill within vocational contexts. This paper presents a theoretical framework that explains how AI-powered tools can be integrated into vocational language education to enhance writing proficiency. The framework combines theories of second language acquisition, socio-constructivist learning, and adaptive learning environments. It proposes that AI acts as a mediating agent by enhancing learner autonomy, providing scaffolded writing practice, and enabling individualized feedback. These aspects are particularly important for vocational language needs. The model identifies three core dimensions based on a synthesis of recent literature: personalization, contextualization, and digital feedback. By outlining these dimensions, the framework provides structured objectives for future studies and curriculum design. This paper also highlights the importance of ethical AI implementation, data privacy, and technology availability in supporting the specialized writing skills needed for learners of English for Specific Purposes (ESP).

🔖

Cite This Article

Çiçek, Ş. T., Can, D. T. (2026). Human-AI collaboration in vocational writing: Building a framework for adaptive English learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1821890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (148)

  1. Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 29(3), 313-334.
  2. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431-440.
  3. Akram, A., Kiren, A., Sabir, S., & Aslam, S. (2025). The effect of AI-based scaffolding on problem solving and metacognitive awareness in learners. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(3), 1074-1089.
  4. Alaamri, K.S.S. (2013). Western teachers’ cultural and linguistic challenges in teaching English language in the classroom. Literacy Information and Computer Journal, 4(3), 1140-1148.
  5. Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2). DOI 10.7759/cureus.35179
  6. Anderson, J. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets. In Advances in instructional Psychology, (Volume 5, pp. 1-33). Routledge.
  7. Ariza, E. N., & Hancock, S. (2003). Second language acquisition theories as a framework for creating distance learning courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2).
  8. Ashfaque, M. W., Tharewal, S., Iqhbal, S., & Kayte, C. N. (2020). A Review on Techniques, Characteristics and approaches of an intelligent tutoring Chatbot system. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC) (pp. 258-262). IEEE.
  9. Athaluri, S. A., Manthena, S. V., Kesapragada, V. K. M., Yarlagadda, V., Dave, T., & Duddumpudi, R. T. S. (2023). Exploring the boundaries of reality: investigating the phenomenon of artificial intelligence hallucination in scientific writing through ChatGPT references. Cureus, 15(4). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37432
  10. Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3).
  11. Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges.
  12. Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427.
  13. Benichou, L. (2023). The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, 124(5), 101456.
  14. Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose (s)?. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1675-1715.
  15. Bulut, O., Cutumisu, M., Aquilina, A. M., & Singh, D. (2019). Effects of digital score reporting and feedback on students' learning in higher education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4, p. 65). Frontiers Media SA.
  16. Bulut, O., & Wongvorachan, T. (2022). Feedback generation through artificial intelligence. In The Open/Technology in education, society, and scholarship association conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-9).
  17. Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skill. Longman.
  18. Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
  19. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE access, 8, 75264-75278.
  20. Cheng, A., Calhoun, A., & Reedy, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use. Advances in Simulation, 10(1), 22.
  21. Chiu, T. K., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240-3256.
  22. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(1), 18-27.
  23. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239.
  24. Çayak, S. (2024). Investigating the relationship between teachers’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence and their artificial intelligence literacy. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(4-ICETOL 2024 Special Issue), 367-383.
  25. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  26. Dasam, S., Goriparthi, P., Manchanda, M., Nowbattula, P. K., & Subhashini, R. (2024, December). Enhancing Writing Skills with AI: Personalized Feedback Mechanisms for English Learners. In 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  27. DeKeyser, R. (2020). Skill acquisition theory. In Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 83-104). Routledge.
  28. Devilly, O. Z. (2021). The impact of an adaptive learning environment on students’ classroom related and learning related emotions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).
  29. Dizon, G. (2017) Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of Alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4): 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
  30. Dong, Y. (2023). Revolutionizing academic English writing through AI-powered pedagogy: Practical exploration of teaching process and assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 52.
  31. Doyal, A. S., Sender, D., Nanda, M., & Serrano, R. A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in medical writing: concerns and ethical considerations. Cureus, 15(8).
  32. Du, H. (2021). Application of Scaffolding Theory (Scaffolding Theory) in Higher Vocational English Teaching. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 5(2), 100-107.
  33. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Durak, G., & Cankaya, S. (2024). Are alarm bells ringing in academia? ChatGPT as a sample of using chatbots in education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 1-17.
  35. Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Özdemir, D., & Can, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric study on its role in transforming teaching and learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 219-244.
  36. Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Esinbay, E., Yaman, H. E., Can, S., Özdemir, D.,. & İncemen, S. (2025). The critical role of structured training in GenAI adoption: a longitudinal case study on student perceptions and skills development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-26.
  37. Durmuş, A., & Dağlı, A. (2017). Integration of vocational schools to industry 4.0 by updating curriculum and programs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies, 1(1), 1-3.
  38. Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527-555.
  39. Eguara, O. (2021). A journey to learner autonomy and self-efficacy via technology-mediated scaffolding. In ICERI2021 Proceedings (pp. 4856-4865). IATED.
  40. Feng, L. (2025). Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted language learning strategies on cognitive load and learning outcomes: a comparative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1741-1774.
  41. Ferrara, E. (2023). Ferrara, E. (2023). Should ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346
  42. Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners. Computers in human behavior, 75, 461-468.
  43. Gardner, J., O'Leary, M., & Yuan, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment:‘Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo?’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1207-1216.
  44. Gevher, M., Öncü, S. E., & Erdoğdu, E. (2025). Exploring the potential use of generative ai for learner support in ODL at scale. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 8(1), 80-99.
  45. Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K.,. & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23.
  46. Gitsaki, C. (1998). Second language acquisition theories: Overview and evaluation. Journal of communication and international studies, 4(2), 89-98.
  47. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive Learning Using Artificial Intelligence in e-Learning: A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216
  48. Gutiérrez-Caneda, B., Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, X. (2023). AI application in journalism: ChatGPT and the uses and risks of an emergent technology. Profesional de la Información, 32(5).
  49. Haristiani, N. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot as language learning medium: An inquiry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1387, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP publishing.
  50. Harrigan, M., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2009). What do academic users want from an adaptive earning system? Retrieved from https://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/2433/1/Harrigan %20et%20al%202009.pdf
  51. Hartman, H. J. (2012). Consuming and constructing knowledge through WebQuests. In Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Online Learning Activities (Vol. 6, pp. 255-289). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  52. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
  53. Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. Routledge.
  54. Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470-497.
  55. Hong, X., & Guo, L. (2025). Effects of AI-enhanced multi-display language teaching systems on learning motivation, cognitive load management, and learner autonomy. Education and Information Technologies, 1-35.
  56. Hornay, P. M. A. (2021). Cognitive load theory and the English language instruction. ACCENTIA: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(1), 43-55.
  57. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 38(1), 237-257.
  58. Huang, X., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Language Education. In The International Conference on Education and Artificial Intelligence 2020 (ICEAI 2020) (pp. 68-69). The Education University of Hong Kong.
  59. Ibrahim, S., & Bilquise, G. (2024). Beyond ChatGPT: Benchmarking speech-recognition chatbots for language learning using a novel decision-making framework. Education and Information Technologies, 1-33.
  60. Jeanjaroonsri, R. (2023). Thai EFL learners’ use and perceptions of mobile technologies for writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 169-193.
  61. Jegede, O. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and English language learning: Exploring the roles of AI-driven tools in personalizing learning and providing instant feedback. Universal Library of Languages and Literatures, 1(2).
  62. Jiménez, R., Binkley, M., McGowan, J., & Parker, K. (2019). Adaptive learning: Personalizing education through advanced technologies. Educause Review, 54(1), 12-27.
  63. Johnson, D. W., & Samora, M. (2021). The role of AI in adaptive language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 45-59.
  64. Kacena, M. A., Plotkin, L. I., & Fehrenbacher, J. C. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 22(1), 115-121.
  65. Kaleci, D. (2025). Integration and application of artificial intelligence tools in the Moodle platform: A theoretical exploration. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 8(1), 100-111.
  66. Kartal, G. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on thinking skills and creativity of EFL student teachers: a narrative inquiry. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(4), 627-642.
  67. Kaur, P., Kumar, H., & Kaushal, S. (2023). Technology-assisted language learning adaptive systems: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 4, 301-313.
  68. Kerly, A., Ellis, R., & Bull, S. (2007, December). CALMsystem: a conversational agent for learner modelling. In International conference on innovative techniques and applications of artificial intelligence (pp. 89-102). London: Springer London.
  69. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign language annals, 51(1), 205-218.
  70. Khup, V. K., & Bantugan, B. (2025). Exploring the Impact and Ethical Implications of Integrating AI-Powered Writing Tools in Junior High School English Instruction: Enhancing Creativity, Proficiency, and Academic Outcomes. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3s), 361-378.
  71. Kılınç, S. (2024). Comprehensive AI assessment framework: Enhancing educational evaluation with ethical AI integration. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(4-ICETOL 2024 Special Issue), 521-540.
  72. Kim, H., Hwang, J., Kim, T., Choi, M., Lee, D., & Ko, J. (2025). Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning: Scaffolding Strategies and Self-Directed Learning Perspectives. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-23.
  73. Kim, H., Shin, D. K., Yang, H., & Lee, J. H. (2019). A study of AI chatbot as an assistant tool for school English curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(1), 89-110.
  74. Kim, H., Yang, H., Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Design principles and architecture of a second language learning chatbot. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1-18.
  75. Kim, J. (2012). The effect of situated learning on knowledge transfer of students with and without disabilities in inclusive classrooms: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.
  76. Kim, N. Y. (2016). Effects of Voice Chat on EFL Learners' Speaking Ability according to Proficiency Levels. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 19(4).
  77. Kim, S. J. (2024). Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review. Science Editing, 11(2), 96-106.
  78. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: technology bringing learning science to the classroom. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 61-77.
  79. Korkut, N. (2025). AI-Enhanced English Language Teaching in K–12 Education: A Focus on Four Skills, Vocabulary, and Grammar. BABUR Research, 4(1), 209-227.
  80. Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
  81. Krashen, S. (1992). The input hypothesis: An update. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art, 12(3), 409-431.
  82. Kumar, N., Prasad, S., & Singh, C. P. (2024). Teacher-student interaction in the age of AI: From students’ perspective. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(S14), 3832–3843. Retrieved from https://nano-ntp.com/index.php/nano/article/view/3637
  83. Lalira, J., Pangemanan, Y., Scipio, J., Lumi, S., Merentek, T., & Tumuju, V. (2024). Evaluating the impact of AI tools on grammar mastery: A comparative study of learning outcomes. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles. v8i3.27856
  84. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). The Sociogenesis of Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
  85. Li, M., & Wilson, J. (2025). AI-Integrated Scaffolding to Enhance Agency and Creativity in K-12 English Language Learners: A Systematic Review. Information, 16(7), 519.
  86. Liao, J., Zhong, L., Zhe, L., Xu, H., Liu, M., & Xie, T. (2024). Scaffolding computational thinking with ChatGPT. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1628-1642.
  87. Lingaiah, J., Ishak, S. N., & Mishra, P. K. (2024). AI-driven chatbots as language tutors: Enhancing written proficiency in ESL. International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(5), 78-95.
  88. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
  89. Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5614-5632.
  90. Loeb, I. H., & Gustavsson, S. (2018). Challenges and development in and of vocational teacher education. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 8(3), iii-x.
  91. Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. University of California, Los Angeles.
  92. Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570-581.
  93. Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Cambridge University Press.
  94. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The modern language journal, 82(4), 545-562.
  95. Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1903-1929.
  96. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2014). The Effectiveness of Online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
  97. Mohammad, T., Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Khan, S. I. (2024). Paraphrasing prowess: Unveiling the insights of EFL students and teachers on QuillBot mastery. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 642-650.
  98. Natriello, G. (2017). The adaptive learning landscape. Teachers college record, 119(3), 1-46.
  99. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  100. Pan, Z., & Liu, M. (2022). The role of adaptive scaffolding system in supporting Middle school problem-based learning activities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 117-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221133855
  101. Park, J. (2019). Implications of AI-based grammar checker in EFL learning and testing: Korean high school students' writing. The Korea English Language Testing Association, 14(1), 11-39.
  102. Petrova, M. G., & Mikheeva, N. F. (2021). Artificial intelligence in academic writing teaching. In 4th sintok international conference on social science and management (pp. 37-47).
  103. Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of language and cultural education, 7(3), 135-153.
  104. Poznanskyy, R., Pryimak, L., Apelt, H., Savchuk, N., & Kopchak, L. (2025). Transforming Foreign Language Education: The Role of AI-Based Adaptive Learning Systems in Enhancing Personalized Learning Amid Global Instability. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 4, 8.
  105. Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 10.
  106. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language learning, 45(2), 283-331.
  107. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 26(2), 582-599.
  108. Rongchang, J., Yonghong, C., Yi, P., Shijie, X., & Dandan, Q. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of AI in vocational education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(5), 590-596.
  109. Ryan, T., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2019). Feedback modes matter: Comparing student perceptions of digital and non‐digital feedback modes in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1507-1523.
  110. Sadeghi, N., Kasim, Z. M., Tan, B. H., & Abdullah, F. S. (2012). Learning styles, personality types and reading comprehension performance. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 116-123.
  111. Sampaio, R. F., & Mancini, M. C. (2007). Systematic review studies: a guide for careful synthesis of the scientific evidence. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 11, 83-89.
  112. Sari, E., & Han, T. (2024). The impact of automated writing evaluation on English as a foreign language learners' writing self‐efficacy, self‐regulation, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 2065-2080.
  113. Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1), 105-119.
  114. Shi, H. (2025). Adaptive Learning in Vocational Education: AI-Powered Content Recommendations. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, 2540831.
  115. Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5).
  116. Shute, V. J., & Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 105-114.
  117. Siregar, S. P. E., Sari, F., Sudjoko, S., & Yundayani, A. (2022). Dealing with English writing skills: Through the eyes of vocational students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 18-28.
  118. Sulisworo, D., Rahayu, T., & Akhsan, R. N. (2016). The students’ academic writing skill after implementing blended learning using Facebook. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, (56, вип. 6), 176-191.
  119. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian modern language review, 50(1), 158-164.
  120. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  121. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
  122. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). The expertise reversal effect. In Cognitive load theory (pp. 155-170). New York, NY: Springer New York.
  123. Tai, T.-Y. & Chen, H. H.-J. (2023) The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1485-1502.
  124. Tajik, A. (2025). Exploring the role of AI-driven dynamic writing platforms in improving EFL learners' writing skills and fostering their motivation. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5788599/v1
  125. Timpe-Laughlin, V., & Dombi, J. (2020). Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(2), 221-257.
  126. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). The success or failure of constructivist instruction: An introduction. In Constructivist instruction (pp. 15-22). Routledge.
  127. Tomlinson, B., Torrance, A. W., & Black, R. W. (2023). ChatGPT and works scholarly: Best practices and legal pitfalls in writing with AI. SMU l. Rev. f., 76, 108.
  128. Umutlu, D., & Gursoy, M. E. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence techniques for effective scaffolding of personalized learning in workplaces. Artificial Intelligence Education in the Context of Work, 59-76.
  129. Underwood, J. (2017). Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students. CALL in a Climate of Change: Adapting to Turbulent Global Conditions–Short Papers from EUROCALL 2017, 2017 (2017), 317–321.
  130. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.
  131. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
  132. Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. (2024). Understanding self-directed learning in AI-Assisted writing: A mixed methods study of postsecondary learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100247.
  133. Wang, S., & Shi, X. (2021). Research on correction method of spoken pronunciation accuracy of AI virtual English reading. Advances in multimedia, 2021(1), 6783205.
  134. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press.
  135. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language teaching, 31(2), 57-71.
  136. Wiboolyasarin, W., Kiti, T., Wiboolyasarin, K., Tiranant, P., & Jinowat, N. (2025, July). AI-Driven Corrective Feedback for Low-Proficiency Learners: A Study on Writing Skill Development. In International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education Challenges (pp. 3-20). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  137. Widodo, H. P. (2015). The development of vocational English materials from a social semiotic perspective: Participatory action research. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Adelaide, Australia.
  138. Widodo, H. P. (2016). Teaching English for specific purposes (ESP): English for vocational purposes (EVP). In English language teaching today: Linking theory and practice (pp. 277-291). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  139. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
  140. Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34(3), 327-343.
  141. Yang, Y. T. C., Gamble, J. H., Hung, Y. W., & Lin, T. Y. (2014). An online adaptive learning environment for critical‐thinking‐infused English literacy instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 723-747.
  142. Ying, G. (2022). Research of Enhancing Business English Writing Skills Based on the Blended Learning Model in Vocational College. Asian Social Science, 18(8), 27-34.
  143. Yong, Q. (2020, April). Application of artificial intelligence to higher vocational English Teaching in the Information Environment. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1533, No. 3, p. 032030). IOP Publishing.
  144. Zhang, L., Mohammed, L. A., & Qasim, A. (2024). An Investigation of Higher Vocational Education EFL Teachers: Experiences and Challenges in Using AI for English Grammar Teaching and Learning. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 8131-8142.
  145. Zhang, Y., Yun, Y., An, R., Cui, J., Dai, H., & Shang, X. (2021). Educational data mining techniques for student performance prediction: method review and comparison analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 698490.
  146. Zou, D., Gu, M. M., & Yu, G. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in English Language Education: Seeking the balanced cognitive, affective, and behavioural impact. System, 103783.
  147. Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Esinbay, E., Yaman, H. E., Can, S., Özdemir, D.,. & İncemen, S. (2025). The critical role of structured training in GenAI adoption: a longitudinal case study on student perceptions and skills development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-26.
  148. Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K.,. & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23.