Journals / İzmir Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Emerging Paradoxes in the Consumption Economy: A Socioeconomic Examination of the Lipstick and Labubu Economies

Tüketim Ekonomisinde Yeni Paradokslar: Ruj ve Labubu Ekonomilerinin Sosyoekonomik Analizi

Filiz Kutluay Tutar(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2574-9494
Abdallah Abukalloub(NİĞDE ÖMER HALİSDEMİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0000-1697-5206
Ayşe Güngör(GİRESUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0006-3916-9657
Melisa Çat(GİRESUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-1542-9200
Pages
1–22
Publication Date
2026-03-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that youth unemployment intensifies symbolic and micro-scale consumption behaviors, while social media visibility transforms consumption into a form of identity performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines youth consumption practices during periods of economic uncertainty through the conceptual lenses of the Lipstick Economy and the Labubu Economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Official datasets from TÜİK, ILO, OECD, and the World Bank were analyzed, and social media posts shared under the “#Labubu” hashtag on TikTok and Instagram between 2022 and 2024 were examined using thematic coding.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicate that youth unemployment intensifies symbolic and micro-scale consumption behaviors, while social media visibility transforms consumption into a form of identity performance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tüketim Alışkanlıkları · Ruj Ekonomisi · Labubu Ekonomisi

Abstract

This study examines youth consumption practices during periods of economic uncertainty through the conceptual lenses of the Lipstick Economy and the Labubu Economy. The research adopts a qualitative-oriented design combining systematic literature review, secondary data analysis, and social media content analysis. Official datasets from TÜİK, ILO, OECD, and the World Bank were analyzed, and social media posts shared under the “#Labubu” hashtag on TikTok and Instagram between 2022 and 2024 were examined using thematic coding. Findings indicate that youth unemployment intensifies symbolic and micro-scale consumption behaviors, while social media visibility transforms consumption into a form of identity performance. The Lipstick Economy explains the shift toward accessible luxuries during economic downturns, whereas the Labubu Economy represents digitally mediated, nostalgia-driven micro-consumption patterns. The study argues that these consumption dynamics should be understood not merely as individual choices but as structurally embedded responses shaped by neoliberal economic conditions and digital culture.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ekonomik belirsizlik ve kriz dönemlerinde genç bireylerin tüketim pratiklerini “Ruj Ekonomisi” ve “Labubu Ekonomisi” kavramları çerçevesinde analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, nitel ağırlıklı bir tasarıma dayanmakta olup literatür taraması, ikincil veri analizi ve sosyal medya içerik çözümlemesi yöntemlerini bir arada kullanmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü (ILO), OECD ve Dünya Bankası verileri incelenmiş; ayrıca 2022–2024 döneminde TikTok ve Instagram platformlarında “#Labubu” etiketi altında paylaşılan içerikler tematik kodlama yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, genç işsizliğinin sembolik ve mikro ölçekli tüketim eğilimlerini artırdığını; sosyal medya görünürlüğünün tüketimi kimlik performansına dönüştürdüğünü göstermektedir. Ruj ekonomisi kriz dönemlerinde erişilebilir lükslere yönelimi açıklarken, Labubu ekonomisi dijital kültür ekseninde nostalji ve aidiyet temelli mikro-tüketim biçimlerini temsil etmektedir. Çalışma, bu tüketim örüntülerinin yalnızca bireysel tercihlerle değil, yapısal ekonomik koşullar ve neoliberal tüketim kültürü ile birlikte değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tutar, F. K., Abukalloub, A., Güngör, A., Çat, M. (2026). Emerging Paradoxes in the Consumption Economy: A Socioeconomic Examination of the Lipstick and Labubu Economies. İzmir Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.47899/izsbd.1771517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Acikalin, S., Gul, E., & Develioglu, K. (2009). Conspicuous consumption patterns of Turkish youth: case of cellular phones. Young Consumers, 10(3), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/17473610910986017
  2. Adıgüzel, M. (2021). Türkiye’de genç işsizliği etkileyen faktörler. Econharran, 5(8)100-129. https://izlik.org/JA98TM63YE
  3. Albayrak, M. A. (2023). Türkiye’de üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik finansal okuryazarlık ölçeği (Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American psychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469
  5. Bahl, A., De La Garza, H., Lam, C., & Vashi, N. A. (2022). The lipstick effect during COVID-19 lockdown. Clinics in dermatology, 40(3), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.11.002
  6. Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life, Cambridge. Polity, 10.
  7. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. The SAGE handbook of social media, 1(1), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
  8. Calvo-Porral, C. (2008). Marketing challenges in economic downturns: From the lipstick to the smoothie-bar effect. Progress In Economıcs Research, 1.
  9. China Daily. (2025a, March 28). Pop Mart’s global push pays off as revenue doubles in 2024. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202503/28/WS67e606dea3101d4e4dc2b600.html, Erişim Tarihi:04.08.2025.
  10. China Daily. (2025b, May 8). Pop Mart boosts global presence with flagship stores, IP strategy. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202505/08/WS681c10d1a310a04af22be101.html, Erişim Tarihi:05.08.2025.
  11. Cruz, E. L. L., Ong, A. K. S., & Tomas, D. Q. (2025). Analyzing the causal effects of product uncertainty and product appeal on repurchase intention in blind box toys. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2506613.https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2506613
  12. Özçifçi, V. (2020). Sosyal medyanın tüketicilerin satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.634148
  13. Datta, A. (2017). Are You Neoliberal Fit? The Politics of Consumption under Neoliberalism. The SAGE Handbook of Consumer Culture.
  14. Erdemsoy, E. (2024). Sosyal medyanın gösterişçi tüketim üzerine etkisi: Instagram örneği (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  15. Finansal Okuryazarlık ve Erişim Derneği (FODER). (2015). Türkiye Finansal Okuryazarlık Araştırmasında 120. Sırada. https://www.fo-der.org/turkiye-finansal-okuryazarlik-arastirmasinda-120-sirada/?utm_source, Erişim Tarihi:10.08.2025.
  16. Gong, X., Yee, C. L., Lee, S. Y., Saif, A. N. M., Liu, M., & Anonthi, F. (2024). Unveiling the enigma of blind box impulse buying curiosity: The moderating role of price consciousness. Heliyon, 10(24). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40564
  17. Grohmann, A., & Hamdan, J. (2021). The Effect of self-Control and financial Literacy on impulse borrowing: experimental evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3864924
  18. Huang, H. (2025). The Impact of the IP Economy on Consumer Behavior: A Case Study of Labubu. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 203(1), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.54254/27541169/2025.cau26079
  19. Harvey, D. (2019). Spaces of neoliberalization: towards a theory of uneven geographical development (2. Edition). Franz Steiner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515115223
  20. Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028657
  21. Hirschman, E. C. (1984). Experience seeking: a subjectivist perspective of consumption. Journal of Business research, 12(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90042-0
  22. Jin, L. J., Jieun, K., & Lee, S.-J. (2023). A Study on The Relationship Between National Cultural Differences and Luxury Consumption in the Age of Intelligent Information: Focusing on Consumers in Their 20s in Korea and Brazil. Journal of the Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, 19(3), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.17662/ksdim.2023.19.3.117
  23. Khandeparkar, K., Motiani, M., Chaurasia, S. S., & Chowdhury, J. (2024). A powerful tip: Power's impact on tipping behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13021. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13021
  24. Kim, J., Lee, E., Park, S.-Y. I., Chung, N., & Koo, C. (2024). Compensatory consumption and unplanned purchases: the moderating role of the decision frame effect [Article]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 41(2), 186- 207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2024.2309195
  25. KOSGEB. (2025). Türkiye’de kadın girişimciliği ve kozmetik sektörü raporu. Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmeleri Geliştirme ve Destekleme İdaresi Başkanlığı.
  26. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: redefined. Sage. KR Asia. (2025, March 28). Pop Mart’s global push pays off as revenue doubles in 2024. https://kr-asia.com/pop-marts-global-push-pays-off-as-revenue-doubles-in-2024, Erişim Tarihi:05.08.2025. Kul, B., Özoğlu, M., & Sarıca, Ö. (2023). Türkiye’de Finansal Okuryazarlık: Ortaöğretim Kademesindeki Öğretim Programlarının Finansal Okuryazarlık Açısından İncelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(1), 137-172. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309148.
  27. Kyroglou, G., & Henn, M. (2017). Political Consumerism as a Neoliberal Response to Youth Political Disengagement. Societies, 7(4), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040034.
  28. Lauder, L. (2025, 20 Haziran). Leonard Lauder, visionary beauty brand builder, 1933 2025. Financial Times.
  29. Lee, H., & Lalwani, A. K. (2024). Power Distance Belief and Consumer Purchase Avoidance: Exploring the Role of Cultural Factors in Retail Dynamics. Journal of Marketing Research, 61(2), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231182600
  30. Lee-Won, R. J., Lee, E. J., & Lee, J. A. (2023). Nostalgic social media use and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(2), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0281
  31. Li, M., Kou, S., Pang, J., & Wang, W. (2024). Take me back to the past: the impact of social identity conflict on nostalgic consumption [Article]. Marketing Letters, 35(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09696-1
  32. MacDonald, D., & Dildar, Y. (2020). Social and psychological determinants of consumption: Evidence for the lipstick effect during the Great Recession. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 86, 101527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101527.
  33. Maral, M., Yıldız, F., & Alpaydın, Y. (2021). Türkiye’de Yüksek Öğretim Harcamaları ve Genç İşsizliği İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Analiz. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 8(2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.26650/jepr.907984
  34. Maguire, L. (2025, Aralık 18). From Labubus to 6–7: How 2025 Unfolded on TikTok. Vogue. https://www.vogue.com/article/from-labubus-to-brain-rot-how-2025-unfolded-on-tiktok Erişim Tarihi:04.03.2026.
  35. Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. yale university press. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1187866
  36. McCracken, G. D. (1990). Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2979/1450.0
  37. McDonald, M., Gough, B., Wearing, S., & Deville, A. (2017). Social psychology, consumer culture and neoliberal political economy. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour, 47(3), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12135
  38. Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2009). How to market in a downturn. Harvard business review, 87(4), 52-62.
  39. Raza, M., Khalid, R., Loureirco, S. M. C., & Han, H. (2024). Luxury brand at the cusp of lipstick effects: Turning brand selfies into luxury brand curruncy to thrive via richcession. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103850
  40. RFI Asia. (2025, 5 Ağustos). The rise of Labubu: Blind boxes, hype, and the thrill of the hunt. RFI Asia. https://rfi.asia/insight/the-rise-of-labubu-blind-boxes-hype-and-the-thrill-of-the-hunt/, Erişim Tarihi:20.02.2026.
  41. Riaz, K., Hussainy, S. K., & Khan, K. (2022). Nostalgia advertising and consumer purchase intention: An empirical study from Pakistan. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(4), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no4.0153
  42. Sevim, N., Temizel, F., & Sayılır, Ö. (2012). The effects of financial literacy on the borrowing behaviour of Turkish financial consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(5), 573-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01123.x
  43. Sidra, S. (2025). Investigation of the dimensions and measurement of compensatory consumption behavior at different scales. IROCAMM-International Review Of Communication And Marketing Mix, 8(1), 106-128. https://doi.org/10.12795/irocamm.2025.v08.i01.06
  44. Song, K. (2025). Analysis Marketing Strategy of Pop Mart and Potential Solutions. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 60, 235-240. https://doi.org/10.54097/eh6smw63
  45. Song, S., Tian, M., Fan, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Temporal landmarks and nostalgic consumption: The role of the need to belong. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 123.
  46. Statista. (2025). Growth rate of the global cosmetics market from 2012 to 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/297070/growth-rate-of-the-global-cosmetics-market/, Erişim Tarihi:08.08.2025.
  47. Şüküroğlu, V. K. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında tüketici vatandaş sorumluluğu. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 65, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7424
  48. Tekin, A. (2021). 2000’li Yıllardan Günümüze Türkiye Ekonomisinde Genç İşsizlik Sorunu ve Çözüm Önerileri. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 28(3), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.876938
  49. TikTok Newsroom. (2025, Temmuz 30). From Labubus to lip stains: TikTok reveals the biggest shopping trends of 2025 so far. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-gb/tiktok-shopping-report Erişim Tarihi:04.03.2026.
  50. Tunçsiper, Ç., & Örs, E. (2025). Pricing of Labubu Figures in Digital Marketplaces: A Behavioral Economics Analysis. Izmir Democracy University Social Sciences Journal, 8(2), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.61127/idusos.1820147
  51. TÜİK. (2024). İşgücü İstatistikleri 2024. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu.
  52. Türk Ekonomi Bankası & Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. (2022). Finansal okuryazarlık ve dijital olgunluk endeksi 2022: Türkiye sonuçları. https://www.teb.com.tr/UPLOAD/PDF/2023/TEB-FOE-ve-Dijital-Olgunluk-Rapor-2022-Kamu-Paylasimi.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:05.08.2025.
  53. Veblen, T. (2017). The theory of the leisure class. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135373
  54. Villi, B. (2012). Kadınların Kozmetik Ürünlerde Plansız Satın Alma Davranışları Üzerine BirAlan Araştırması, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kütahya.
  55. Wei, Z., & Yu, B. (2025). Why do you engage in blind box consumption? Exploring the group interactions and psychological motivations in blind box consumption. Current Psychology, 44(18), 15168-15182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08150-x
  56. World Bank. (2024). Youth unemployment rate (% of total labor force ages 15–24) (modeled ILO estimate). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.ZS, Erişim Tarihi:08.08.2025.
  57. Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., & Qin, J. (2022). Research on the driving factors of collective nostalgia and the impact of collective nostalgia on national brand consciousness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16738. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416738