Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Top 100-Cited Articles in Tinnitus: A Bibliometric Analysis

Pages
7–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION This bibliometric analysis identified the top 100 cited research articles about tinnitus and provided a track record of the historical development and trends in tinnitus research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles about tinnitus research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS Using the Web of Science database, we searched the term “tinnitus” from 1900 to date and ordered the articles sequentially based on the highest to the lowest total number of citation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION This bibliometric analysis identified the top 100 cited research articles about tinnitus and provided a track record of the historical development and trends in tinnitus research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles about tinnitus research. MATERIAL and METHODS Using the Web of Science database, we searched the term “tinnitus” from 1900 to date and ordered the articles sequentially based on the highest to the lowest total number of citation. Then, we listed the top 100 cited articles and further analyzed them in terms of author, publication year, research category, journal, institution, and country. All data are reported as tabulated values, bar graph, and percentage. No statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS The most cited article received 726 citations. With 12 articles, the Hearing research journal published the highest number of articles. Moreover, 51 out of 100 articles originated from the USA. Southern Illinois University with 18 articles ranked the first in the list, followed by the University of Antwerp with 10 articles. Furthermore, 45% and 42% of these articles were categorized under the fields of neuroscience and otorhinolaryngology, respectively. CONCLUSION This bibliometric analysis identified the top 100 cited research articles about tinnitus and provided a track record of the historical development and trends in tinnitus research.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, S. M. (2020). Top 100-Cited Articles in Tinnitus: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 7–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/150203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang GH, Klein BE, Klein R, Nieto FJ, et al. Tinnitus and its risk factors in the Beaver Dam offspring study. Int J Audiol 2011; 50(5): 313-20. [CrossRef] 2. Bakhshaee M, Ghasemi M, Azarpazhooh M, Khadivi E, Rezaei S, Shakeri M, et al. Gabapentin effectiveness on the sensation of subjective idiopathic tinnitus: a pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 265(5): 525–30. [CrossRef] 3. Bauer CA. Tinnitus and Hyperacusis. In: Flint PW. Haughey BH. Lund VJ editors. Cummings otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. St Louis; 2010. pp. 2131–9. [CrossRef] 4. Davis A, Refaie AE. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler R. editor. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: CA; 2000. pp. 1–23. 5. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP. Treatment of tinnitus based on a neurophysiological model. In: Vernon JA. editor. Tinnitus Treatment and Relief. Needham Heights. MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1998. pp. 201–17. 6. Hoffman HJ, Reed GW. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Snow JB. editor. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Lewiston: NY; 2004. pp.16–41. 7. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. J Am Med Assoc 1987; 257(1): 52-9. [CrossRef] 8. Garfield E. The impact factor and its rightful use [in German]. Anaesthesist 1998; 47(6): 439-40. [CrossRef] 9. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 1999; 161(8): 979-80. 10. Uysal E. Top 100 Cited Classic Articles in Breast Cancer Research. Eur J Breast Health 2017;13(3): 129-37. [CrossRef] 11. Tao T, Zhao X, Lou J, Bo L, Wang F, Li J, et al. The top cited clinical research articles on sepsis: a bibliometric analysis. Crit Care 2012; 16(3): R110. [CrossRef] 12. Joyce CW, Sugrue CM, Joyce KM, Kelly JL, Regan PJ. 100 citation classics in the melanoma literature: a bibliometric analysis. Dermatol Surg 2014;40(12): 84-98. [CrossRef] 13. Cao F, Li J, Li A, Fang Y, Li F. Citation classics in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2012;12(4): 325-30. [CrossRef] 14. Gu W, Yuan Y, Yang H, Qi G, Jin X, Yan J. A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential papers on COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10: 667–76. [CrossRef] 15. Ho YS, Hartley J. Classic articles in psychology in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Br J Psychol 2016; 107(4): 768-80. [CrossRef] 16. Khan MS, Ullah W, Riaz IB, Bhulani N, Manning WJ. Tridandapani S. et al. Top 100 cited articles in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016; 18(1):8