SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2003 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

İleri İmalat Teknolojilerinin Performans Üzerindeki Etkileri ve İşletme Stratejisi ile Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Katkıları: Gaziantep'teki İmalat Firmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Performance Impacts and Moderating Effects of Advenced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTS) on the Business Strategy-Performance Relationship: A Study of Manufacturing Firms in Gaziantep

Nihat KAYA
Lütfihak ALPKAN
MEHMET AYTEKİN
Pages
59–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study empirically examines the performance impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) and business strategies in Turkish manufacturing firms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The empirical investigation concentrates specifically on the performance impact of the generic business strategies, namely cost leadership and differentiation, at lower and higher levels ofAMT usage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:performans · performance

Abstract

This study empirically examines the performance impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) and business strategies in Turkish manufacturing firms. The empirical investigation concentrates specifically on the performance impact of the generic business strategies, namely cost leadership and differentiation, at lower and higher levels ofAMT usage. The findings, derived from data collected f rom 180 manufacturing firms operating in various sectors in the Gaziantep industrial region of Turkey, confirm the strategic importance of AMTs. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türk imalat firmalarında işletme stratejilerinin ve ileri imalat teknolojilerinin şirket performansı üzerindeki etkilerini ampirik olarak incelemektedir. Araştırmada özettikle, ileri imalat teknolojilerinin, düşük veya yüksek seviyelerde kullanıldığı işletmelerde, maliyet liderliği ve farklılaştırma gibi jenerik işletme stratejilerinin firma performansına nasıl etkiler yaptığına odaklanılmıştır. Gaziantep sanayi bölgesinde çeşitli sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren 180 firmadan toplanan veriler analiz edilerek ileri imalat teknolojilerinin önemini doğrulayan bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Bu bulgulardan hareketle bazı teorik ve yönetsel öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, N., ALPKAN, L., AYTEKİN, M. (2003). İleri İmalat Teknolojilerinin Performans Üzerindeki Etkileri ve İşletme Stratejisi ile Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Katkıları: Gaziantep'teki İmalat Firmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 59–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/150151

References (16)

  1. Akgemci, T. (2001). KOBİ'lerin Temel Sorunları ve Sağlanan Destekler (Basic Problems of SMEs and the Supports Provided). Ankara:
  2. KOSGEB Yayınları.
  3. Attaran, M. (1989). "The Automated Factory: Justification and Implementation," Business Horizons,32(3): 80-85.
  4. Barringer, B.R. and Bluedorn, A.C. (1999). "The Relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management," Strategic Management Journal, 20:421-444.
  5. Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods. New York: Wiley. Burcher, P.O. and Lee, G.L. (2000). "Competitiveness Strategies and AMT Investment Decisions," Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(5): 340. Cagliano, R. and Spina, G. (2000). "How Impowement Programmes of Manufacturing Are Selected: The Role of Strategic Priorities and Past Experience," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7): 772-792.
  6. Chan, F.T.S., Chan, M.H. and Lau, R.W.L. (2001). "Investment Appraisal Techniques for Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT): A Literature Review," Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(1):346-350.
  7. Dean, J.W., Jr. and Snell, S.A. (1996). "The Strategic Use of Integrated Manufacturing: An Empirical Examination," Strategic Management Journal, 17(6): 459-480.
  8. Devaraj, S., Hollingworth, D.G. and Schroeder, R.G. (2001). "Generic Manufacturing Strategies: An Emprical Test of Two Configurational Typologies," Journal of Operations Management, 19: 427-452.
  9. Efstathiades, A., Tassou, S. and Antoniu, A. (2002). "Strategic Planning, Transfer and Implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of An Integrated Process Plan," Technovation, 22: 201-212.
  10. Frohlich, M. (1998). "How Do You Succesfully Adopt an Advanced Manufacturing Technology?" European Management Journal, 16(2): 151-159.
  11. Goldhar, J.D. and Jelinek, M. (1983). "Plan for Economies of Scope," Harvard Business Review, March-April: 87-95.
  12. Goldhar, J.D. and Lei, D. (1994). "Organizing and Managing the CIM/FMS Firm for Maximum Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Technology Management, 8(5/6/7): 709-732.
  13. Gupta, A. (1995). "A Stakeholder Analysis Approach for Interorganizational Systems," Industrial Management and Data Systems, 95(6): 3-7.
  14. Hambrick, D.C. (1983). "High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach," Academy of Management Journal, 26: 687-707.
  15. Hayes, R.H., Wheelright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1988). Dynamic Manufacturing. New York: Free Press.
  16. Kotha, S. and Orne, D. (1989).