Journals / İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Political Entertainment, Digital Interaction: A Systematic Review of Politainment Studies

Siyasal Eğlence, Sayısal Etkileşim: Politainment Çalışmalarına Sistematik Bir Bakış

Selçuk Çetin(BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2110-0874
Pages
126–147
Publication Date
2025-10-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Few studies criticaly engage with the deeper implications of the politainment phenomenon.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the general trends in the international literature concerning the increasingly prominent phenomenon of politainment within the field of political communication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, 17 English language articles indexed in Scopus, each of which includes the term “politainment” in its title, abstract or keywords and has received at least five citiations were selected for analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Few studies criticaly engage with the deeper implications of the politainment phenomenon.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:siyasal iletişim · politainment · yeni medya

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the general trends in the international literature concerning the increasingly prominent phenomenon of politainment within the field of political communication. Politainment refers to the production of entertaining content by political actors in an efford to reach voters, blending political messages with element of popular culture. The study focuses on academic publications to identify scholarly trends in the field of politainment. In this context, 17 English language articles indexed in Scopus, each of which includes the term “politainment” in its title, abstract or keywords and has received at least five citiations were selected for analysis. These studies were examined through descriptive analysis, with a systematic evaluation of their subjects, data collection tecniques, research contexts, platforms utilized, and key findings. In line with the study’s limitations, the finding suggest that most prominent research emphasized social media platforms especially TikTok, YouTube and X (formerly Twitter) which are predominantly used for producing entertaining content to enhance political visibility. However, the communication practices observed on these platforms tend not to foster deliberative interaction with citizens; rather, they tend to reduce citizens to passive spectators. Few studies criticaly engage with the deeper implications of the politainment phenomenon.

Özet

Bu çalışma, siyasal iletişim alanında giderek daha görünür hale gelen politainment olgusunun uluslararası literatürdeki genel eğilimlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Politainment, politik aktörlerin seçmenlere ulaşmak için eğlenceli içerikler üretmesini ve siyasal mesajlarını bu içerikler aracılığıyla sunmasını ifade etmektedir. Çalışmada, politainment alanındaki akademik eğilimleri belirlemek amacıyla literatürde yer alan yayınlar incelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda, uluslararası alan indekslerinden Scopus’ta taranan; başlık, özet veya anahtar kelimelerinde “politainment” ifadesi geçen, İngilizce dilinde yazılmış ve en az beş atıf almış 17 makale değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Seçilen çalışmalar, betimsel analiz yöntemiyle çözümlenmiş; ele aldıkları konular, veri toplama teknikleri, araştırma bağlamları, kullanılan mecralar ve ulaştıkları temel bulgular sistematik biçimde değerlendirilmiştir.Çalışmanın sınırlılıkları doğrultusunda elde edilen bulgular, politainment araştırmalarının büyük bir bölümünün özellikle TikTok, YouTube ve X (eski adıyla Twitter) gibi sosyal medya platformlarına odaklandığını göstermektedir. Bu platformların büyük ölçüde siyasal görünürlüğü artırmak amacıyla eğlenceli içerik üretiminde kullanıldığı anlaşılmaktadır. Ancak, bu mecralarda yürütülen iletişim pratiklerinin yurttaşlarla müzakere temelli etkileşimleri teşvik etmediği; aksine, yurttaşları edilgen izleyicilere indirgediği görülmektedir. Politainment olgusunun daha derin etkilerine eleştirel biçimde eğilen çalışmaların ise oldukça sınırlı olduğu dikkat çekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çetin, S. (2025). Political Entertainment, Digital Interaction: A Systematic Review of Politainment Studies. İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 126–147. https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1799758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Berrocal Gonzalo, S., Zamora Medina, R., & Rebolledo de la Calle, M. (2021). Politainment social audience and political engagement: Analysing Twitter conversations in Spain. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 13(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00037_1
  2. Berrocal‐Gonzalo, S., Zamora‐Martínez, P., & González‐Neira, A. (2023). Politainment on Twitter: Engagement in the Spanish legislative elections of April 2019. Media and Communication, 11(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6292
  3. Berrocal, S., Campos, E., & Redondo, M. (2014). Media prosumers in political communication: Politainment on YouTube. Comunicar, 43(XXII), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-06
  4. Brantner, C., & Lobinger, K. (2014). Campaign comics: The use of comic books for strategic political communication. International Journal of Communication, 8, 248-274. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2142/1068
  5. Brants, K., & van Praag, P. (2017). Beyond media logic. Journalism Studies, 18(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1065200
  6. Cervi, L., & Marín-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. Profesional de la información, 30(4), Article e300403. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
  7. Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & García Blesa, F. (2023). TikTok and political communication: The latest frontier of politainment? A case study. Media and Communication, 11(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6390
  8. Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & Marín Lladó, C. (2021). TikTok and the new language of political communication: The case of Podemos. Cultura, lenguaje y representación / Culture, Language and Representation, 26, 267-287. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5817
  9. Corner, J., & Pels, D. (Eds.). (2003). Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. Sage.
  10. Di Nubila, K., Ballesteros‐Herencia, C. A., Etura, D., & Martín‐Jiménez, V. (2023). Technopopulism and politainment in Brazil: Bolsonaro government’s weekly YouTube broadcasts. Media and Communication, 11(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6470
  11. Dörner, A. (2002, June). Politainment versus Mediokratie. In Thesenvortrag, Cologne Conference/Medienforum NRW.
  12. Durántez-Stolle, P., & Martínez-Sanz, R. (2019). Politainment in the transmedia construction of the image of politicians. Communication & Society, 32(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.2.111-126
  13. Ertürk, H. A. (2022). Yeni medya ekseninde ideolojiyi anlamak: filtre balonları ve yankı odaları. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 1(2), 137-159.
  14. Gil-Ramírez, M., Gómez de Travesedo-Rojas, R., & Almansa-Martínez, A. (2019). Politainment and political personalisation. From television to YouTube? Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 74, 1542-1564. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1398en
  15. Grapă, T.-E., & Mogoș, A.-A. (2023). The spectacle of “patriotic violence” in Romania: Populist leader George Simion’s mediated performance. Media and Communication, 11(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6367
  16. Ibrahim, A., & Eltantawy, N. (2017). Egypt’s Jon Stewart: Humorous political satire and serious culture jamming. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2806-2824. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6359/2084
  17. Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). "Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy?. Political communication, 16(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613
  18. Nieland, J.-U. (2008). Politainment. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp047
  19. Plazas‐Olmedo, M., & López‐Rabadán, P. (2023). Selfies and speeches of a president at war: Volodymyr Zelensky’s strategy of spectacularization on Instagram. Media and Communication, 11(2), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6366
  20. Quintas-Froufe, N., González-Neira, A., & Conde-Vázquez, E. (2020). Spanish audience interest in televised politics: From electoral debates to politainment. Communication & Society, 33(3), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.85-100
  21. Riegert, K., & Collins, S. (2015). Politainment. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc157
  22. Schultz, D. (2001). Celebrity politics in a postmodern era: The case of Jesse Ventura. Public Integrity, 3(4), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15580989.2001.11770886
  23. Street, J. (2019). What is Donald Trump? Forms of ‘celebrity’in celebrity politics. Political studies review, 17(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918772995
  24. Soto de la Cruz, J., de la Hera, T., Cortés Gómez, S., & Lacasa, P. (2023). Digital games as persuasion spaces for political marketing: Joe Biden’s campaign in Fortnite. Media and Communication, 11(2), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6476
  25. Uydur, N. (2019). Tüketim toplumu ve dondurmam gaymak film incelemesi. İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 252-270.
  26. Van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield.
  27. Zamora‐Medina, R., Suminas, A., & Fahmy, S. S. (2023). Securing the youth vote: A comparative analysis of digital persuasion on TikTok among political actors. Media and Communication, 11(2), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6348