SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Wettability of AH Plus on root dentin treated with irrigation solutions with conventional methods or PIPS activation

AH Plus’ın geleneksel yöntem ya da PIPS aktivasyonu ile uygulanan yıkama solüsyonlarıyla muamele edilmiş kök dentini yüzeyini ıslatabilirliği

MAKBULE BİLGE AKBULUT
ARSLAN TERLEMEZ
AHMET BURÇİN BATIBAY
Pages
39–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, wetting behavior of AH Plus on dentin, was not affected by the type of the irrigation solution or application technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wetting behavior of epoxy-resin based sealer (AH Plus) on root dentine treated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) with conventional methods or photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) combination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, the samples were divided into 6 groups (n=10) and following irrigation procedures were applied: Group 1, NaOCl; Group 2, CHX; Group 3, EDTA, Group 4, NaOCl+PIPS; Group 5, CHX+PIPS; Group 6, EDTA+PIPS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, wetting behavior of AH Plus on dentin, was not affected by the type of the irrigation solution or application technique.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wetting behavior of epoxy-resin based sealer (AH Plus) on root dentine treated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) with conventional methods or photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) combination. Materials and Methods: Sixty single rooted teeth were prepared and fixed in silicone impression material. After setting, teeth were sectioned vertically on buccolingual direction. One half was removed and the other half was placed into the silicone. Then, the samples were divided into 6 groups (n=10) and following irrigation procedures were applied: Group 1, NaOCl; Group 2, CHX; Group 3, EDTA, Group 4, NaOCl+PIPS; Group 5, CHX+PIPS; Group 6, EDTA+PIPS. Untreated halves of randomly selected ten teeth were used as control and incubated in distilled water. One droplet of sealer was placed on each dried sample. Dynamic Contact Angle Analyzer was used to measure contact angle between sealer and root dentin. Data was statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. Results: The mean contact angle value was 60.93° in NaOCl group, 57.77° in CHX group, 64,61° in EDTA group and there was no statistically significant difference between contact angles in experimental groups and control group (p>0,05). PIPS activation of irrigation solutions did not significantly change wetting behavior of AH Plus (p>0,05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, wetting behavior of AH Plus on dentin, was not affected by the type of the irrigation solution or application technique.

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı; epoksi rezin içerikli kök kanal patının (AH Plus) sodyum hipoklorit (NaOCl), klorheksidin glukonat (CHX), etilendiamintetraasetik asit (EDTA) yıkama solüsyonlarının geleneksel yöntemle ya da foton indüklü fotoakustik dalgalanma (PIPS) aktivasyon tekniğiyle uygulandığı dentin yüzeyini ıslatabilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma için 60 adet tek köklü diş hazırlandı ve dişler silikon ölçü maddesi içerisine sabitlendi. Silikon sertleştikten sonra dişler bukkolingual yönde dikey olarak iki parçaya ayrıldı. Bir yarım diş örneği tekrar silikon içerisine yerleştirildi. Örnekler 6 deney grubuna ayrıldı (n=10) ve şu yıkama prosedürleri uygulandı: Grup 1, NaOCl; Grup 2, CHX; Grup 3, EDTA; Grup 4, NaOCl+PIPS; Grup 5, CHX+PIPS; Grup 6, EDTA+PIPS. İşlem görmeyen diğer yarım diş örneklerinden rastgele seçilen 10 tanesi kontrol grubu olarak kullanıldı ve distile su içerisinde bekletildi. Bir damla kök kanal patı her bir kuru dentin yüzeyine damlatıldı. Kanal patı ve kök dentini arasındaki temas açısı dinamik temas açısı ölçüm cihazıyla belirlendi. Veriler, tek yönlü varyans analizi ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Ortalama temas açısı değerleri NaOCl grubunda 60.93°, CHX grubunda 57.77°, EDTA grubunda 64,61° olup deney grupları ve kontrol grubunun temas açıları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Yıkama solüsyonlarının PIPS ile aktivasyonu AH Plus’ın ıslatma davranışını değiştirmemiştir (p >0,05). Sonuç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın sınırları dahilinde yıkama solüsyonunun türü ve uygulama metodu AH Plus’ın ıslatma davranışını etkilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, M. B., TERLEMEZ, A., BATIBAY, A. B. (2018). Wettability of AH Plus on root dentin treated with irrigation solutions with conventional methods or PIPS activation. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 39–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/150062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjogren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 86-93. Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: Technical, biological and clinical testing. Endodontic Topics 2005; 12: 25-38. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-398.
  2. Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjaderhane L, Grad H, Gorduysus O, Huang J, et al. Substantive antimicrobial activity in chlorhexidine-treated human root dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 240-245.
  3. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994; 20: 276-278.
  4. Akçay I, Erdilek N, Şen BH. Değişik İrigasyon solüsyonlarının kök kanal dentini üzerindeki etkilerinin sem ile İncelenmesi. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2009; 30: 115-124.
  5. Ekim ŞNA, Erdemir A. Endodontide irrigasyon aktivasyon yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2015; 25: 98-104.
  6. DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium:Yag laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 273-280.
  7. Dogan Buzoglu H, Calt S, Gumusderelioglu M. Evaluation of the surface free energy on root canal dentine walls treated with chelating agents and naocl. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 18-24. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent 1992; Suppl 5: 81-94.
  8. Hu X, Ling J, Gao Y. Effects of irrigation solutions on dentin wettability and roughness. J Endod 2010; 36: 1064-1067. Prado M, de Assis DF, Gomes BP, Simao RA. Effect of disinfectant solutions on the surface free energy and wettability of filling material. J Endod 2011; 37: 980-982. de Assis DF, Prado M, Simao RA. Evaluation of the interaction between endodontic sealers and dentin treated with different irrigant solutions. J Endod 2011; 37: 1550- 1552. Milosevic A. The influence of surface finish and in-vitro pellicle on contact-angle measurement and surface morphology of three commercially available composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 85-97.
  9. Bohn S, Ilie N. Wetting behaviour of silicone- and resin-based root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 542- 549. Yilmaz Z, Basbag B, Buzoglu HD, Gumusderelioglu M. Effect of low-surface-tension edta solutions on the wettability of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pa