SavedAdd your journal

Journals / InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Ecological Footprint Convergence in Emerging Market Economies: Panel Data Analysis

Ahmet Yılmaz Ata(Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi/İktisat Bölümü)0000-0001-5928-8801
Ayşe Eryer0000-0002-6556-1605
Mohamed Abdulkarim0000-0001-9364-2595
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding indicates that there is convergence within these economies to achieve global sustainabilit

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the fast-growing global landscape, environmental degradation has commenced to be recognized as an outcome of industrialization and globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This indicator is considered as an assessment that signifies the biological area utilized to generate the resources necessary for individuals to sustain their existence and to assimilate of waste.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding indicates that there is convergence within these economies to achieve global sustainabilit
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ecological Footprint · Environmental Pollution · Emerging Market Economy

Abstract

In the fast-growing global landscape, environmental degradation has commenced to be recognized as an outcome of industrialization and globalization. Several indicators associated with environmental degradation are studied in the literature. One of these indicators is the ecological footprint. This indicator is considered as an assessment that signifies the biological area utilized to generate the resources necessary for individuals to sustain their existence and to assimilate of waste. Accordingly, acknowledging the significance of current environmental policies, it is shown as an exceptionally comprehensive indicator. In this article, utilizing the 1990-2022 dataset for selected emerging market economies, the existence of ecological convergence was examined through panel unit root tests. This study was found that the ecological footprint in emerging market economies was stable. This finding indicates that there is convergence within these economies to achieve global sustainabilit

🔖

Cite This Article

Ata, A. Y., Eryer, A., Abdulkarim, M. (2025). Ecological Footprint Convergence in Emerging Market Economies: Panel Data Analysis. InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.55065/intraders.1587832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (66)

  1. Abdioğlu Z. & Uysal T. (2013). Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Turkey: General and Sectoral Analysis, Finance Political & Economic Comments, 50(575), 85-102.
  2. Akçacı, T. & Yılmaz, Ö. (2021). G-8 Ülkeleri ve Türkiye’de Dışa Açıklık, Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Reel Döviz Kuru İlişkisi Üzerine Panel Veri Analizi International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 5(2), 381-399. https://doi.org/110.38015/sbyy.1007871
  3. Apaydın, Ş., Ursavaş, U. ve Koç, Ü. (2021). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi: Yakınsama kulüpleri önemli mi? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 53379–53393, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14300-y
  4. Apergis, N.& Payne, J. E. (2017). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across U.S. states by sector and fossil fuel source: Evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Economics, 63, 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco. 2016.11.027
  5. Apergis, N., and Payne, J. E. (2020). NAFTA and the Convergence of CO2 Emissions Intensity and Its Determinants’, International Economics, 161: 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.10.002
  6. Arogundade, S.; Hassan, A.; Akpa, E.; Mduduzi, B. (2023). Closer together or farther apart: are there club convergence in ecological footprint?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 15293-15310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23203-5
  7. Ayyıldız, F. V., & Üzümcü, A. (2022). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları- İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisi: BRICS-T Ülkeleri Örneği. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(1), 28-40.
  8. Baltagi B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons
  9. Barro, R. J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economics, 100 (2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
  10. Bayraktar, Y., Koç, K., Toprak, M., Özyılmaz, A., Olgun, M.F., Lorente, D.B. & Soylu, Ö. B. (2023). Convergence of Per Capita Ecological Footprint among BRICS-T Countries: Evidence from Fourier Unit Root Test, Enviromental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26532-1
  11. Bayrakdar, S. & Soyyiğit, S., (2020). Yapısal Kırılmalar Altında Ticari Açıklığın ve Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının İstihdam Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi: E7 Ülkeleri Örneği, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 34(1), 39-62, DOI:10.16951/atauniiibd.614660
  12. Belloc, I.; Molina, J. A. (2022). The ecological footprint in Africa: identifying convergence clubs from 1970 to 2018. Applied Economics Letters, 30(19), 2808-2813. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2107984
  13. Bilgili, F. & Ulucak, R. (2018). Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(35), 35404-35419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3457-1.
  14. Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., & Koçak, E. (2019). Implications of Environmental Convergence: Continental Evidence Based on Ecological Footprint. In Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization (pp. 133-165). Springer, Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_6
  15. Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  16. Brock, W. A. & Taylor, M. S. (2003). The Kindergarten Rule of Sustainable Growth. NBER No. Working Paper 9597, Massachusetts.
  17. Bucak, Ç. (2021). G8 Ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de Ekonomik Karmaşıklık ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisi: Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi Analizi, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.999109
  18. Burnett, J.W. (2016). Club convergence and clustering of US energy-related CO2 emissions. Resour Energy Econ. 46, 62–84.
  19. Cabas, M. (2023). Yeni Sanayileşen Ülkelerde Ekolojik Ayak İzi Yakınsaması: Panel Fourier Birim Kök Testinden Kanıtlar, Aıcmes 2nd International Conference On Current Scientific Standards Aprıl 6 - 9, 2023
  20. Ceylan R. (2010). Yakınsama Hipotezi: Teorik Tartışmalar, Sosyo-Ekonomi, 100103, 50-53.
  21. Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., and Ivanovski, K. (2020). Stochastic Convergence in Per Capita CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Emerging Economies, 1921–2014, Energy Economics, 86: 104659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104659
  22. Chudik, A. & Pesaran, M. H. (2013). Common Correlated Effects Estimation of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models With Weakly Exogenous Regressors (Federal Reserve Bank Of Dallas Globalization And Monetary Policy Institute working paper no. 146). https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/institute/wpapers/2013/0146
  23. Christidou, M.; Panagiotidis, T.; Sharma, A. (2013). On the stationarity of per capita carbon dioxide emissions over a century. Economic Modelling, 33, 918-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.024
  24. Çelik, O.; Adali, Z.; Bari, B. (2023). Does ecological footprint in ECCAS and ECOWAS converge? Empirical evidence from a panel unit root test with sharp and smooth breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 16253-16265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23178-3
  25. Emir, F., Balcilar, M. & Shahbaz, M.,(2019). Inequality in Carbon Intensity in EU-28: Analysis Based on Club Convergence. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 (4), 3308–3319, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3858-1
  26. Erden Özsoy, C. & Dinç, A. (2016). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 53(619), 35-55.
  27. Gençoğlu, P., Kuşkaya, S. & Büyüknalbant, T. (2020). Seçilmiş OECD Ülkelerinde Sağlık Harcamalarının Sürdürülebilirliğinin Panel Birim Kök Testleri İle Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.498440
  28. Güçlü, A. (2007). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Türkiye’nin Çevre Politikaları, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara
  29. Haider, S. & Akram, V. (2019). Club Convergence Analysis of Ecological and Carbon Footprint: Evidence from A Cross-Country Analysis, Carbon Management, 10(5), 451-463.
  30. Herrerias, M. J. (2013). The Environmental Convergence Hypothesis: Carbon Dioxide Emissions According to The Source of Energy. Energy Policy, 61, 1140-1150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.120
  31. Işık, C., Ahmad, M., Ongan, S., Özdemir, D., Irfan, M. & Alvarado, R. (2021). Convergence Analysis of The Ecological Footprint: Theory and Empirical Evidence from The USMCA Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-12
  32. Kazemzadeh, E.; Fuinhas, J.A.; Koengkan, M.; Osmani, F. (2022).The Heterogeneous Effect of Economic Complexity and Export Quality on the Ecological Footprint: A Two-Step Club Convergence and Panel Quantile Regression Approach, Sustainability, 14, 11153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811153
  33. Lee, C. C. & Chang, C. P. (2008). New Evidence on the Convergence of Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Panel Seemingly Unrelated Regressions Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test, Energy, 33 (9), 1468-1475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.05.002
  34. Lee, C. C. & Chang, C. P. (2009). Stochastic Convergence of Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Multiple Structural Breaks in OECD Countries, Economic Modelling, 26 (6), 1375-1381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.07.003
  35. Özcan, B., Ulucak, R. & Doğan, E. (2019). Analyzing Long Lasting Effects of Environmental Policies: Evidence from Low-, Middle- and High-Income Economies, Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 130-143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.025
  36. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy Consumption, Urbanization, Financial Development, Income and CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC Hypothesis with Structural Breaks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
  37. Pata, U.K.(2020). N11 Ülkelerinde Kişi Başına Düşen Ekolojik Ayak İzi Yakınsıyor Mu? Panel Veri Analizi, 20. Uluslararası Ekonometri, Yöneylem Araştırması Ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, Mayıs-2020, 52-59.
  38. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Cambridge Wor¬king Papers in Economics, 435.
  39. Pesaran, H. M. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
  40. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. & Yamagata, T. (2008). A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
  41. Panopoulou, E.; Pantelidis, T. (2009). Club convergence in carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10640008-9260-6
  42. Rees, W.E. (1992). Ecological Footprints And Appropriated Carrying Capacity: What Urban Economics Leaves Out. Environment and Urbanization 4, 121–130.
  43. Romero-Ávila, D. (2008). Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialised countries revisited. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2265-2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.003
  44. Salahuddin, M., Gow, J., ve Ozturk, I. (2015). Is the Long-Run relationship between Economic Growth, Electricity Consumption, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Financial Development in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries Robust?, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 317-326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.005
  45. Schaefer, F., Luksch, U., Steinbach, N., Cabeça, J. & Hanauer, J. (2006). Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity: The World’s Ability to Regenerate Resources and Absorb Waste in A Limited Time Period. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
  46. Solarin, S.A. (2014). Convergence of CO2 Emission levels: Evidence from African Countries, Journal of Economic Research 19, 65-92.
  47. Solarin, S. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Bello, M. O. (2019). A Multi-Country Convergence Analysis of Ecological Footprint and Its Components, Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101422.
  48. Solarin, S. A. (2019). Convergence in CO2 Emissions, Carbon Footprint and Ecological Footprint: Evidence from OECD Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6167-6181. Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  49. Strazicich, M. & List, J. (2003). Are CO2 Emission Levels Converging among Industrial Countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, 263-271.
  50. Swamy, P.(1970). Efficien Inference in A Random Coefficient Regression Model, Econometrica, 38(2),311-322 Tarı, R.(2015). Ekonometri, Umuttepe Yayınları, 534s.
  51. Tatar, H. E. (2022). Ecological Footprint Reflection in Asean-5 Countries: SURADF and SURKSS Unit Root Test, Fiscaoeconomia, 6(3), 1018-1035. Doi: 10.25295/fsecon.1071194
  52. Taylor, M.P ve Sarno, L. (1998). The Behavior of Real Exchange Rates During the Post –Bretton Woods Period, Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, 46(2), 281-312.
  53. Tillaguango, B., Alvarado, R., Dagar, V., Murshed, M., Pinzón, Y. & Méndez, P. (2021). Convergence of the Ecological Footprint in Latin America: The Role of The Productive Structure, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13.
  54. Tiwari, A. K., Kyophilavong, P., & Albulescu, C. T. (2016). Testing the Stationarity of CO2 Emissions Series in Sub-Saharan African Countries by Incorporating Nonlinearity and Smooth Breaks, Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 527-540, DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.005
  55. Turan, S. (2014). Küreselleşen Dünyada Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmanın Önemi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
  56. Ulucak, R. ve Lin, D. (2017). Persistence of Policy Shocks to Ecological footprint of the USA, Journal of Ecological Indicators, (80), 337-343, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.020
  57. Wang, S., Li, Q., Fang, C., ve Zhou, C. (2016). The Relationship between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and CO2 Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China, Science of the Total Environment, 542, 360-371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.027
  58. Wackernagel, M. ve Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on The Earth (Vol. 9). New Society Publishers.
  59. Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D. & Murray,M. (2005). National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts, The Underlying Calculation Method.
  60. Westerlund, J.; Basher, S. A. (2008). Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 40(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9143-2
  61. Yavuz, N. C.& Yilanci, V. (2013). Convergence in per capita carbon dioxide emissions among G7 countries: A TAR panel unit root approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54, 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9595-x
  62. Yu, S., Hu, X., Fan, J.-L. & Cheng, J., 2018. Convergence of carbon emissions intensity across Chinese industrial sectors. J. Cleaner Prod. 194, 179–192.
  63. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2020). Panel zaman serileri analizi, stata uygulamalı (3. Baskı). Beta Yayınları
  64. Yılancı, V. & Pata, U. K. (2020). Convergence of Per Capita Ecological Footprint Among The ASEAN-5 Countries: Evidence from A Non-Linear Panel Unit Root Test, Ecological Indicators, 113, 106178.
  65. Yilanci, V.; Gorus, M. S. & Solarin, S. A. (2022). Convergence in per capita carbon footprint and ecological footprint for G7 countries: Evidence from panel Fourier threshold unit root test, Energy & Environment, 33(3), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211011461
  66. Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., and Ivanovski, K. (2020). Stochastic Convergence in Per Capita CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Emerging Economies, 1921–2014, Energy Economics, 86: 104659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104659