SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Adaptation of Xenophobia Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Melehat Gezer(DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7701-3203
Mustafa İlhan(DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1804-002X
Pages
230–243
Publication Date
2022-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, we aimed to adapt the Xenophobia Scale developed by Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) into Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We conducted research on two separate study groups comprising 563 teacher candidates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Xenophobia scale · scale adaptation · validity

Abstract

In this research, we aimed to adapt the Xenophobia Scale developed by Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) into Turkish. We conducted research on two separate study groups comprising 563 teacher candidates. Before starting the adaptation process of the scale, we obtained necessary permissions from the authors, who developed the original form. When developing the translation form, we removed two of the scale items from the instrument because they were not suitable for the Turkish culture. Afterwards, we performed an item analysis and found that the item correlations of two of the items in the scale remained less than the threshold value of .30. We removed the two items in question, thereby leaving 20 items in the scale. In the applied EFA and CFA, we obtained a two-dimensional structure that overlaps with the original form of the scale. In the reliability analysis, we determined that the internal consistency coefficients exceeded .70 criterion values for both subscales. In conclusion, the results we acquired from psychometric analyses indicate that the Turkish form of the Xenophobia Scale yielded valid and reliable measurements.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gezer, M., İlhan, M. (2022). Adaptation of Xenophobia Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 230–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/1497359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Akıllıoğlu, T. (1997). Contemporary forms and manifestations of racism and racial discrimination against immigrants. Perceptions Journal of International Affairs, 2(2). Barry, D. (2019). Ethnodoxy, national exceptionalism, and xenophobia: A case study of contemporary Russia. National Identities, 21(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2018.1431876
  2. Bayram, N. (2009). Data analysis with SPSS in social sciences (2nd ed.). Ezgi. Bozdağ, F., & Kocatürk, M. (2017). Development of xenophobia scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Journal of International Social Research, 10(52), 615–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1921
  3. Büyüköztürk, B., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2011). Statistics for social sciences (7th ed.). Pegem Academy.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Manual of data analysis for social sciences (12th ed.). Pegem Academy. Canetti-Nisim, D., & Pedahzur, A. (2003). Contributory factors to political xenophobia in a multi-cultural society: The case of Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00014-2
  5. Erdoğan, M., (2014). Syrians in Turkey: Social acceptence and integration. HUGO (Hacettepe University Migration and Politics Research Center).
  6. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/0022-4537.00220
  7. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
  8. Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.147
  9. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines forimproving test adaptation practices. The Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/48345/39215
  10. Haque, A. E. (2015). Construction and validation of a new measure of xenophobia. Northwestern University.
  11. Hjerm, M. (2001). Education, xenophobia and nationalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830124482
  12. JASP Team. (2021). JASP (0.15 Version) [Computer software].
  13. Lee, E. (2020). America first, immigrants last: American xenophobia then and now. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 19(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781419000409
  14. Lesetedi, G., & Modie-Moroka, T. (2007). Reverse xenophobia: Immigrants attitudes to citizens in Botswana [Conference presentation abstract]. The African Migrations Workshop: Understanding Migration Dynamics in the Continent at the Centre for Migration Studies, University of Ghana, Ghana.
  15. Levada, Y. A. (1994). Novyi russkiy natsionalizm: ambitsii, phobii, kompleksi. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyie peremeni: Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya, (1), 15–17.
  16. Marsella, A. J., & Ring, E. (2003). Human migration and immigration: An overview. In L. L. Adler & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Migration: Immigration and emigration in international perspective (pp. 3–22). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  17. Nell, I. A. (2009). The tears of Xenophobia: Preaching and violence from a South African Perspective. Practical Theology in South Africa, 24(2), 229–247. Retrieved from https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC88685
  18. NGO Committee on Migration. (2001). International migration, racism, discrimination and xenophobia. Retrieved from https://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/migration/taskforce/docs/wcar.pdf
  19. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2006). Insiders & outsiders: Citizenship & xenophobia in contemporary Southern Africa. Zed Books.
  20. Olonisakin, T. T., & Adebayo, S. O. (2021). Xenophobia: scale development and validation. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 39(3), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2020.1853686
  21. Ommundsen, R., & Larsen, K. S. (1999). Attitudes toward illegal immigration in Scandinavia and United States. Psychological Reports, 84(3), 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.84.3c.1331
  22. Omoluabi, P. F. (2008). Psychological foundation of xenophobia. IFE Psychologia, 16(2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.4314/ifep.v16i3.23777
  23. Özer, A., & Akbasli, S. (2020). Adaptation of a cross-national measure of fear-based xenophobia to Turkish culture. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01111-6
  24. Özmete, E., Yıldırım, H., & Duru, S. (2018). Adaptation of the scale of xenophobia to Turkish culture: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 40(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v18i39974.451063
  25. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Australian Copyright.
  26. Psychology Dictionary. (2015). What is xenophobia? Definition of xenophobia. Retrieved from https://psychologydictionary.org/xenophobia/
  27. Rzepnikowska, A. (2018). Racism and xenophobia experienced by Polish migrants in the UK before and after Brexit vote. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1451308
  28. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  29. Solomon, H., & Kosaka, H. (2013). Xenophobia in South Africa: Reflections, narratives and recommendations. Southern African Peace and Security Studies, 2(2), 5–30. Retrıeved from https://saccps.org/pdf/2-2/SAPSS%202(2)%20Solomon%20&%20Kosaka.pdf
  30. Symeonaki, M., & Kazani, A. (2012). Measuring xenophobia in Greece using neural network and fuzzy techniques, [Conference presentation abstract]. Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Chania, Greece.
  31. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
  32. Tafira, K. (2011). Is xenophobia racism?. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(3-4), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2011.11500015
  33. Thalhammer, E., Zucha, V., Enzenhofer, E., Salfinger, B., & Ogris, G. (2001). Attitudes towards minority groups in the European Union-A special analysis of the Eurobarometer 2000 survey on behalf of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. Vienna, Austria: SORA
  34. The United Nations. (2013). Xenophobia. Human right of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palaisdes Nations. CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland.
  35. Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Huque, A. S. Q. (2014). Asian immigrants in North America with HIV/AIDS stigma, vulnerabilities and human rights. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-119-0
  36. Urbina, S. (2014). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  37. Ünal, S. (2014). Turkey's unexpected guests: Foreign immigrants and refugees experience in the context of “other”. Journal of World of Turks, 6(3), 65–89. Retrieved from http://www.dieweltdertuerken.org/index.php/ZfWT/article/view/643/643
  38. van der Veer, K., Ommundsen, R., Krumov, K., Van Le, H., & Larsen, K. S. (2008). Scale development to measure attitudes toward unauthorized migration into a foreign country. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00641.x
  39. van der Veer, K., Ommundsen, R., Yakushko, O., Higler, L., Woelders, S., & Hagen, K. A. (2013). Psychometrically and qualitatively validating a cross-national cumulative measure of fear-based xenophobia. Quality & Quantity, 47(3), 1429–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9599-6
  40. van der Veer, K., Yakushko, O., Ommundsen, R., & Higler, R. (2011). Cross-national measure of fear-based xenophobia: Development of a cumulative scale. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.17.PR0.109.4.27-42
  41. Yakushko, O. (2009). Xenophobia: Understanding the roots and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(1), 36–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008316034
  42. Akıllıoğlu, T. (1997). Contemporary forms and manifestations of racism and racial discrimination against immigrants. Perceptions Journal of International Affairs, 2(2).