SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Nitrate Chemical Denitrification with Zero-Valent Manganese and Ultrasound

Sıfır Değerlikli Mangan ve Ultrases ile Nitratın Kimyasal Denitrifikasyonu

Ayşe Burcu İLERİ
Özge TERZİOĞLU
Yasemin ÇİÇİ
Pages
32–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reduction of NO3 - with US/Mn0 led to formation of small amounts of nitrite (NO2 - ) and ammonium (NH4 + ) reduction compounds, with an increase in transformation rate to nitrogen gas (N2) identified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of particle dose (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 g) and duration (0-60 min) using zero-valent manganese (Mn0 ) and ultrasound (US) processes alone and combined (US/Mn0 ) on nitrate (NO3 - ) removal were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the ultrasound process was applied alone, there was little effect on removal of NO3 - .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reduction of NO3 - with US/Mn0 led to formation of small amounts of nitrite (NO2 - ) and ammonium (NH4 + ) reduction compounds, with an increase in transformation rate to nitrogen gas (N2) identified.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effect of particle dose (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 g) and duration (0-60 min) using zero-valent manganese (Mn0 ) and ultrasound (US) processes alone and combined (US/Mn0 ) on nitrate (NO3 - ) removal were investigated. When the ultrasound process was applied alone, there was little effect on removal of NO3 - . Also, as the Mn0 dose increased the NO3 - removal increased as well. It was determined that the effect of the combined US/Mn0 application increases the chemical denitrification capacity of Mn0 particles. With only Mn0 at the end of 60 min, only 70% NO3 - removal occurred, while with the ultrasonic mechanical force effect in the same experimental conditions 95% NO3 - removal was obtained within 30 min. The reduction of NO3 - with US/Mn0 led to formation of small amounts of nitrite (NO2 - ) and ammonium (NH4 + ) reduction compounds, with an increase in transformation rate to nitrogen gas (N2) identified.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sıfır değerlikli mangan (Mn0 ) ve ultrases (US) prosesleri tekli ve birleşik (US/Mn0 ) kullanılarak, partikül dozu (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 ve 2 g) ile reaksiyon süresinin (0-60 dk) nitrat (NO3 - ) giderimine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ultrases prosesi tek başına uygulandığında nitrat (NO3 - ) giderimine etkisi az iken; Mn0 dozu arttıkça NO3 - giderimi yükselmiştir. Birleşik US/Mn0 uygulamasında ise ultrases etkisiyle Mn0 partiküllerinin kimyasal denitrifikasyon kapasitesini arttırdığı belirlenmiştir. Sadece Mn0 ile 60 dk sonunda %70 civarında NO3 - giderimi gerçekleşirken, aynı deneysel şartlarda ultrasonik mekanik kuvvet etkisi ile 30 dk içerisinde %95 civarında bir NO3 - giderimi elde edilmiştir. US/Mn0 ile nitratın indirgenmesi sonucu nitrit (NO2 - ) ve amonyum (NH4 + ) indirgenme bileşikleri az miktarda oluşurken, azot gazına (N2) dönüşüm oranının arttığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLERİ, A. B., TERZİOĞLU, Ö., ÇİÇİ, Y. (2019). Nitrate Chemical Denitrification with Zero-Valent Manganese and Ultrasound. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 32–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/149536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adewuyi Y.G., 2001. Reviews-sonochemistry: Environmental Science and Engineering Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40: 4681-4715.
  2. Agrawal G.D., Lunkad S.K., Malkhed T., 1999. Diffuse Agricultural Nitrate Pollution of Groundwaters in India. Water Science and Technology, 39 (3): 67–75. Almasri M.N., 2007. Nitrate Contamination of Groundwater: A Conceptual Management Framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27 (3): 220–242.
  3. Almasri M.N., Kaluarachchi J.J., 2004. Assessment and Management of Long-term Nitrate Pollution of Groundwater in Agriculture-dominated Watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 295 (1-4): 225–245. APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. Archna Sharma S. K., Sobti R.C., 2012. Nitrate Removal from Groundwater: A Review. EJournal of Chemistry, 9 (4): 1667–1675.
  4. Bokare A.D., Cho W., 2008. Zero-valent Aluminum for Oxidative Degradation of Aqueous Organic Pollutants. Environmental Science and Technology, 43 (18): 7130–7135.
  5. Chiu Y.T., Lin C.H., Jechan Lee J., Andrew Lin K.Y., 2019. Reduction of Nitrate to Nitrite in Water by Acid-washed Zero-valent Zinc. Separation Science and Technology. Choe S., Liljestrand H. M., Khim J., 2004. Nitrate Reduction by Zero-valent Iron under Different pH Regimes. Applied Geochemistry, 19 (3): 335–342.
  6. Crane R.A., Scott T.B., 2012. Nanoscale Zero-valent Iron: Future Prospects for an Emerging Water Treatment Technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 211-212: 112–125.
  7. Dada A.O., Adekola F.A., Odebunmi, E.O., 2017. A Novel Zerovalent Manganese for Removal of Copper Ions: Synthesis, Characterization and Adsorption Studies. Applied Water Science, 7 (3): 1409–1427. Doğanlar D.U., 2006. Effects of Wastewater Irrigation on Groundwater Quality. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi,
  8. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, Türkiye. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Fargas D. R., 2017. In Situ Groundwater Remediation Treatments: Natural Denitrification Study and Nano Zero-Valent Iron Production. Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya, Natural Resources and Environment Doctorate Programme, İspanya. (Doktora Tezi) Geiger C.L., Ruiz N.E., Clausen C.A., Reinhart, Quinn J.W., 2002. Ultrasound Pretreatment of Elemental Iron: Kinetic Studies of Dehalogenation Reaction Enhancement and Surface Effects. Water Research, 36 (5): 1342-1350. Harter T., 2009. Agricultural Impacts on Groundwater Nitrate, Nitrates in Groundwater. Southwest Hydrology Magazine, 8 (4): 1-38.